Skip to main content

Receiving fulsome praise from RSS-BJP, will Dr. Ambedkar survive if he appears now in India?

By Shamsul Islam 
If we trust the glorification of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar by the RSS-BJP rulers on his birth anniversary, it would seem as if there have never been more loyal followers of him than them. According to PM Modi, he was the “architect of the Constitution of India” and “Messiah of Scheduled Castes.” The UP government has announced a grand celebration of ‘Ambedkar Jayanti,’ beginning with a series of programmes from the morning of April 13 (2025), leading up to the main celebrations on April 14 in Lucknow, which will be attended by Hindutva icon CM Adityanath. These programmes “aim to acquaint the younger generation with Dr Ambedkar’s remarkable life, visionary leadership, and his unwavering commitment to justice, equality, and social reform.”
Dr. Ambedkar is receiving fulsome praise now that he is no longer alive. When he was alive, the RSS and its allies, including VD Savarkar-led Hindu Mahasabha, never missed an opportunity to denigrate him—often going so far as to burn his effigy. If Dr. Ambedkar were to reappear today in a BJP-RSS ruled India, it's certain he would either be lynched or jailed under terror laws for opposing casteism, the denigration of Shudras and women, upper-caste hegemony, and Hindutva.
1. Dr. Ambedkar Supported the Burning of Manusmriti
The RSS has long advocated replacing the Indian Constitution with the Manusmriti or Manu Code, which is infamous for its derogatory and inhumane references to Shudras, Untouchables, and women. When the Constitution was finalized on November 26, 1949, the RSS was discontent. Its mouthpiece, Organiser, in a November 30, 1949 editorial, lamented:
“But in our Constitution, there is no mention of the unique constitutional development in ancient Bharat. Manu’s Laws were written long before Lycurgus of Sparta or Solon of Persia… But to our constitutional pundits that means nothing.”
By demanding the promulgation of the Manu Code in independent India, the RSS was echoing its ideological guru VD Savarkar, who stated:
“Manusmriti is that scripture which is most worship-able after the Vedas for our Hindu Nation… Today Manusmriti is Hindu Law.”
It is notable that Dr. Ambedkar publicly burned a copy of Manusmriti at the historic Mahad Satyagraha on December 25, 1927, and called for it to be burned annually on that date.
2. Dr. Ambedkar Held High-Caste Hindus Responsible for the Miserable Condition of the Masses and Hatred for Muslims
He made it clear:
“[The] high caste Hindus are bad as leaders… They have a monopoly of education and wealth, and with wealth and education they have captured the State… They take every move to exclude the lower classes of Hindus from wealth, education and power…”
“This attitude… is sought to be extended by them to the Muslims. They want to exclude the Muslims from place and power, as they have done to the lower-class Hindus. This trait… is the key to the understanding of their politics.”
[B.R. Ambedkar, Pakistan or the Partition of India, Bombay: Government of Maharashtra, 1990, p. 123]
3. Dr. Ambedkar Renounced Hinduism
In his historic speech in Nagpur on October 15, 1956, the day after converting to Buddhism, Ambedkar declared:
“The movement to leave the Hindu religion was taken in hand by us in 1935… I am happy; I am ecstatic! I have left hell — this is how I feel…”
If he were to try converting today, we can only imagine the terrible fate he would meet.
4. Dr. Ambedkar Fought for Equal Rights for Women
For the RSS, Hindu women are considered inferior. It upholds Manusmriti, which denigrates women in statements like:
a. "Day and night woman must be kept in dependence…"
b. "A woman is never fit for independence."
c. "They give themselves to the handsome and to the ugly…"
d. "They become disloyal to their husbands…"
e. "Impure desires, wrath, dishonesty… bad conduct."
f. "Women are as impure as falsehood itself…"
In contrast, Ambedkar believed:
“We shall see better days… if male education is pursued side by side with female education.”
“I measure the progress of a community by the degree of progress women have achieved.”
He advised Dalit women:
“Never regard yourself as Untouchables… Attend more to the cultivation of the mind… Education is as necessary for females as it is for males…”
5. Dr. Ambedkar Opposed the Hindu Nation and Hindutva
A sharp analyst of communal politics, Ambedkar highlighted the eerie agreement between Hindu Mahasabha and Muslim League on the Two-Nation Theory:
“Strange it may appear, Mr. Savarkar and Mr. Jinnah… are in complete agreement… there are two nations in India.”
He denounced the idea of Hindu Rashtra:
“If Hindu Raj becomes a fact, it will be the greatest calamity… It is a menace to liberty, equality and fraternity… Hindu Raj must be prevented at any cost.”
6. Dr. Ambedkar Advocated Socialism
Responding to Nehru’s Objective Resolution in the Constituent Assembly (December 17, 1946), Ambedkar stated:
“… I should have expected some provision… for social and economic justice… I expected the resolution to state… there would be nationalisation of industry and land…”
7. Dr. Ambedkar Rejected Bigoted 'Patriots' and 'Nationalists'
In 1931, he said that when he demanded equality for the oppressed, he was branded anti-national. He declared:
“India is a peculiar country, and her nationalists and patriots are a peculiar people… The patriot's one cry is power… I belong to that class which takes its stand on democracy… Our aim is to realise… one man, one value in all walks of life.”
[Plenary Session, Round Table Conference, London, 8th Sitting, January 19, 1931]
---
Links to S. Islam's writings (English, Hindi, Urdu + translations): http://du-in.academia.edu/ShamsulIslam. Facebook: https://facebook.com/shamsul.islam.332. Twitter: @shamsforjustice. http://shamsforpeace.blogspot.com/. Books in English, Hindi & Urdu: https://tinyurl.com/shams-books

Comments

TRENDING

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी: जल जीवन मिशन के लक्ष्य को पाने समन्वित प्रयास जरूरी

- राज कुमार सिन्हा*  जल संसाधन से जुड़ी स्थायी समिति ने वर्तमान लोकसभा सत्र में पेश रिपोर्ट में बताया है कि "नल से जल" मिशन में राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी साबित हुए हैं। जबकि देश के 11 राज्यों में शत-प्रतिशत ग्रामीणों को नल से जल आपूर्ति शुरू कर दी गई है। रिपोर्ट में समिति ने केंद्र सरकार को सिफारिश की है कि मिशन पुरा करने में राज्य सरकारों की समस्याओं पर गौर किया जाए। 

Censor Board's bullying delays 'Phule': A blow to India's democratic spirit

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  A film based on the life and legacy of Jyotiba Phule and Savitribai Phule was expected to release today. Instead, its release has been pushed to the last week of April. The reason? Protests by self-proclaimed guardians of caste pride—certain Brahmin groups—and forced edits demanded by a thoroughly discredited Censor Board.

CASR urges immediate halt to Operation Kagaar, calls for peace talks with Maoists

By A Representative   The Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), a collective of over 40 civil society organizations, has issued a press statement demanding an immediate end to "Operation Kagaar" and alleged state-led killings of Maoist rebels and indigenous people in central India. The group also called on the central government to create a conducive environment for initiating peace talks with the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist).

Maoist call for peace talks: A democratic opening amidst state repression?

By Harsh Thakor*  The readiness of the CPI (Maoist), a banned organisation, for peace talks is seen as signifying a democratic gesture that should be welcomed by all who uphold democratic values. The ongoing conflict under ‘Operation Kagaar’ in Central India represents a clash between alleged state aggression and self-defence by oppressed communities. Critics argue that the Indian government has violated constitutional principles by promoting corporate expansion in Adivasi regions under the pretext of development, endangering the lives and livelihoods of local populations.

Incarcerated for 2,424 days, Sudhir Dhawale combines Ambedkarism with Marxism

By Harsh Thakor   One of those who faced incarceration both under Congress and BJP rule, Sudhir Dhawale was arrested on June 6, 2018, one of the first six among the 16 people held in what became known as the Elgar Parishad case. After spending 2,424 days in incarceration, he became the ninth to be released from jail—alongside Rona Wilson, who walked free with him on January 24. The Bombay High Court granted them bail, citing the prolonged imprisonment without trial as a key factor. I will always remember the moments we spent together in Mumbai between 1998 and 2006, during public meetings and protests across a wide range of issues. Sudhir was unwavering in his commitment to Maoism, upholding the torch of B.R. Ambedkar, and resisting Brahmanical fascism. He sought to bridge the philosophies of Marxism and Ambedkarism. With boundless energy, he waved the banner of liberation, becoming the backbone of the revolutionary democratic centre in Mumbai and Maharashtra. He dedicated himself ...

Why crucifixion is a comprehensive message of political journey for the liberation of the oppressed

By Vijayan MJ  Passion week is that time of the year when Christians all over the world remind themselves about the sufferings, anguish, pain and the bloody crucifixion that Jesus Christ took on himself, as part of his mission of emancipating the people and establishing the kingdom of god. The crucifixion was not just a great symbolism of the personal sacrifice of one person, but it was a comprehensive messaging of a political journey for the liberation of the oppressed; one filled with struggle, militancy, celebration of life, rejection of temptations, betrayals, grief, the long-walk with the cross, crucifixion and ultimately resurrection as a symbol of victory over the oppressors and evil. 

How Mumbai University crumbles: Not just its buildings

By Rosamma Thomas*  In recent days, the news from the University of Mumbai has been far from inspiring – clumps of plaster have fallen off the ceiling at the CD Deshmukh Bhavan, and it was good fortune that no one was injured; creepy crawlies were found in the water dispenser that students use to collect drinking water, and timely warning videos circulated by vigilant students have kept people safe so far.

CPM’s evaluation of BJP reflects its political character and its reluctance to take on battle against neo-fascism

By Harsh Thakor*  A controversial debate has emerged in the revolutionary camp regarding the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s categorization of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Many Communists criticize the CPM’s reluctance to label the BJP as a fascist party and India as a fascist state. Various factors must be considered to arrive at an accurate assessment. Understanding the original meaning and historical development of fascism is essential, as well as analyzing how it manifests in the present global and national context.

Akhilesh Yadav’s boycott of Dainik Jagran: A step towards accountability or political rhetoric?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat  Akhilesh Yadav has called for a total boycott of Dainik Jagran, a newspaper owned by the Gupta family. He also declared that the Samajwadi Party will no longer participate in any panel discussions organized by a media channel allegedly controlled by the family or relatives of the omnipresent Rajiv Shukla. Akhilesh Yadav and the Samajwadi Party are well aware that Dainik Jagran has long been antagonistic to Dalit-Bahujan interests. The newspaper represents a Bania-Brahmin corporate and ideological enterprise.