Aurangzeb's demonization serves political purposes, 'intimidating' Muslims through issues like cow-beef, love jihad, land jihad

By Ram Puniyani

Since the demolition of the Babri Mosque by the RSS Combine in 1992, a particular version of history, focusing on kings and their religions, is being selectively imposed on the collective social consciousness. Taking this further, communal forces are now linking history with nationalism. Interestingly, the history of the era of kingdoms is being tied to nationalism, ignoring the fact that the nation-state is a modern concept, and the idea of India emerged parallel to the struggle against colonial powers.

Communal forces are portraying Hindu kings who fought against Muslim rulers as patriots, great nationalists, and national icons. Nathuram Godse, who assassinated Mahatma Gandhi, in his book "May It Please Your Honour", described Gandhi as a "pygmy" compared to the nationalism of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj or Maharana Pratap. Today, those who share Godse's ideology are reiterating these views with greater intensity.

Recently, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Adityanath Yogi sharply criticized those glorifying historical invaders, calling it an act of treason that "new India" will not tolerate. His remarks coincided with rising demands for the removal of Mughal ruler Aurangzeb's tomb in Maharashtra's Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar district. Similarly, Dattatray Hosabale, the Sarkaryavah (General Secretary) of the RSS, questioned whether idolizing figures who opposed India's ethos was appropriate. He pointed out that advocates of the Ganga-Jamuni culture (a fusion of Hindu and Islamic cultural elements) have never idolized Dara Shikoh, Aurangzeb's elder brother and a pioneer of such ideas.

Aurangzeb is often demonized as an invader and a cruel villain. However, was he truly an invader? Aurangzeb inherited the empire from his father, Shah Jahan. The Mughal dynasty began with Babur, who ruled Kabul. Babur was invited by Rana Sanga to defeat Ibrahim Lodi, the ruler of Delhi. However, Babur ended up fighting both Rana Sanga and Ibrahim Lodi to establish his rule over the Delhi Empire.

Before Babur, India saw invasions by Greeks, Kushans, Huns, and Shakas, who eventually became part of the local populace. The Mughals were not the only rulers who came to India; the Khiljis, Ghulams, and Ghaznavids also arrived after defeating local kings. India, as we know it today, did not exist as a unified nation. Kings fought each other for power and wealth, while interactions with diverse groups like the Shakas, Huns, Kushans, and Ahoms in the East created the syncretic culture prevalent here.

Who represents the icon of the Indian nation? Yogi and Godse present Shivaji and Rana Pratap as national icons. Shivaji's administration included many Muslim generals and officers. He fought against Aurangzeb, whose army was led by Mirza Raja Jai Singh. Rana Pratap's bravery at Haldighati is commendable, but does it symbolize a fight for Indian nationalism? His army of 3,000 included 1,000 Pathans led by Hakim Khan Sur. On the other side, Akbar's army was commanded by Man Singh. The battle was not about nationalism but about mansab (rank and revenue). Even if Hindu nationalists wish to present those who fought against Muslims as national icons, the reality is more complex—it was kings versus kings, not Hindus versus Muslims.

Not all Muslim kings were cruel, nor were all Hindu kings messengers of peace. Emperor Ashoka is infamous for the Kalinga War. The Chola kings' wars with the Chalukyas were brutal; for instance, Rajendra Chola's army decapitated the Chalukya general Samudra Raj and mutilated his daughter.

Aurangzeb's demonization serves political purposes, intimidating and marginalizing Muslims through issues like cow-beef, love jihad, and land jihad. Some Muslims, facing violence and ghettoization, find a semblance of pride in Aurangzeb. However, the primary goal of demonizing Aurangzeb is political—to target today's Muslim community.

History can be presented in various ways. Hindu communalists overemphasize kings to obscure the brutalities of the caste-Varna hierarchy and the subjugation of women. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar viewed Indian history as a battle between Buddhism and Brahmanism. According to him, Buddhism emerged as a revolutionary force against Brahmanical caste-Varna values, spreading as a major religion in India and Southeast Asia under Emperor Ashoka. However, this revolution was followed by a counter-revolution led by Pushyamitra Shunga, who physically eradicated Buddhists, causing Buddhism to disappear from India until Ambedkar revived it.

The colonial period's social reforms mitigated some of the brutalities inflicted on Dalits and women, though these issues persist today. Icons like Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Jyotirao Phule, and Babasaheb Ambedkar, who fought against the caste-Varna system, deserve recognition. Where do Bhagat Singh, Ashfaqulla Khan, Gandhi, Maulana Azad, Sardar Patel, Nehru, and Subhas Chandra Bose fit in the narrative of Indian icons?

The overemphasis on the cruelties of Muslim kings serves two purposes for the Hindu nationalist project: targeting religious minorities and obscuring the Brahminical system's oppression of weaker sections of society. While leaders like the Prime Minister and the Chief Minister of Maharashtra praise films like *Chhava*, they avoid promoting films that highlight atrocities against Dalits and women. For instance, BJP leader Vijayaraje Scindia once upheld the practice of sati (the immolation of widows). Today, leaders like Yogi, Fadnavis, and Hosabale continue to exploit communal narratives.

Comments

Aurangzeb’s last will recorded by his Maulvi: Allah shouldn't make anyone emperor

By Mohan Guruswamy Aurangzeb’s grave is a simple slab open to the sky lying along the roadside at Khuldabad near Aurangabad. I once stopped by to marvel at the tomb of an Emperor of India whose empire was as large as Ashoka the Great's. It was only post 1857 when Victoria's domain exceeded this. The epitaph reads: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast." (The rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave) The modest tomb of Aurangzeb is perhaps the least recognised legacies of the Mughal Emperor who ruled the land for fifty eventful years. He was not a builder having expended his long tenure in war and conquest. Towards the end of his reign and life, he realised the futility of it all. He wrote: "Allah should not make anyone an emperor. The most unfortunate person is he who becomes one." Aurangzeb’s last will was re...

Beyond his riding skill, Karl Umrigar was admired for his radiance, sportsmanship, and affability

By Harsh Thakor* Karl Umrigar's name remains etched in the annals of Indian horse racing, a testament to a talent tragically cut short. An accident on the racetrack at the tender age of nineteen robbed India of a rider on the cusp of greatness. Had he survived, there's little doubt he would have ascended to international stature, possibly becoming the greatest Indian jockey ever. Even 46 years after his death, his name shines brightly, reminiscent of an inextinguishable star. His cousin, Pesi Shroff, himself blossomed into one of the most celebrated jockeys in Indian horse racing.

PUCL files complaint with SC against Gujarat police, municipal authorities for 'unlawful' demolitions, custodial 'violence'

By A Representative The People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has lodged a formal complaint with the Chief Justice of India, urging the Supreme Court to initiate suo-moto contempt proceedings against the police and municipal authorities in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The complaint alleges that these officials have engaged in unlawful demolitions and custodial violence, in direct violation of a Supreme Court order issued in November 2024.

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das* India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

Haven't done a good deed, inner soul is cursing me as sinner: Aurangzeb's last 'will'

Counterview Desk The Tomb of Aurangzeb, the last of the strong Mughal emperors, located in Khuldabad, Aurangabad district, Maharashtra, has this epitaph inscribed on it: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e maa ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast" (the rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave).

How polarization between different ideological trends within the communist movement sharpened in India

By Harsh Thakor* This article is a rejoinder to A Note on Slogans of “Left Unity,” “Unity of the Communist Revolutionaries” and “Mass Line” by Umair Ahmed, published on the Nazariya blog .

State Human Rights Commission directs authorities to uphold environmental rights in Vadodara's Vishwamitri River Project

By A Representative The Gujarat State Human Rights Commission (GSHRC) has ordered state and Vadodara municipal authorities to strictly comply with environmental and human rights safeguards during the Vishwamitri River Rejuvenation Project, stressing that the river’s degradation disproportionately affects marginalized communities and violates citizens’ rights to a healthy environment. The Commission mandated an immediate halt to ecologically destructive practices, rehabilitation of affected communities, transparent adherence to National Green Tribunal (NGT) orders, and public consultations with experts and residents. The order follows the Concerned Citizens of Vadodara coalition—environmentalists, ecologists, and urban planners—submitting a detailed letter to authorities, amplifying calls for accountability. The group warned that current plans to “re-section” and “desilt” the river contradict the NGT’s 2021 Vishwamitri River Action Plan, which prioritizes floodpla...

CPM’s evaluation of BJP reflects its political character and its reluctance to take on battle against neo-fascism

By Harsh Thakor* A controversial debate has emerged in the revolutionary camp regarding the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s categorization of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Many Communists criticize the CPM’s reluctance to label the BJP as a fascist party and India as a fascist state. Various factors must be considered to arrive at an accurate assessment. Understanding the original meaning and historical development of fascism is essential, as well as analyzing how it manifests in the present global and national context.

Vadodara citizens urge authorities to adhere to environmental mandates in Vishwamitri River Rejuvenation Project

By A Representative A coalition of environmental activists, ecologists, and urban planners in Vadodara has issued an urgent appeal to state and municipal authorities, demanding strict compliance with court-mandated guidelines for the upcoming Vishwamitri River rejuvenation project. Scheduled to commence in March 2025, the initiative aims to mitigate flooding and restore the river, but citizens warn that current plans risk violating National Green Tribunal (NGT) orders and jeopardizing the river’s fragile ecosystem, home to endangered species like crocodiles and Indian Softshell Turtles.

Buddhist communities in Michigan protest for Mahabodhi Temple’s return to Buddhist control

By A Representative Buddhist communities in Michigan have staged protests demanding the return of the Mahabodhi Vihara in Gaya, Bihar, India, to full Buddhist control. The Mahabodhi Temple, regarded as the holiest pilgrimage site in Buddhism, is currently managed under the Bodhgaya Temple Act of 1949, which grants a majority of control to non-Buddhists.

Search This Blog