Skip to main content

Move to centralise, commercialise, privatise and communalise higher education

By Prakash N. Shah, Hemantkumar Shah,  Dr. Kanu Khadadiya* 
The Draft UGC (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment and Promotion of Teachers and Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education) Regulations, 2025 was circulated by the UGC on 6 January 2025. After detailed study of the ‘Draft UGC Regulations, 2025’, with deep concern and pain, AISEC would like to make statements which include the following:
Whole Draft UGC Regulations 2025 is completely based on ‘National Credit Framework (NCrF)’. This NCrF is not yet debated and validated either in both the houses of Parliament or in various legislative assemblies of states across country.  It is just a draft prepared by an ‘appointed high level committee’.  As enunciated by constitution, our country is a union of states and education is essentially subject matter of both centre and states.
Clause 1.6 states as follows,
"All HEIs shall, as soon as possible, but not later than six months of the coming into force of these regulations, take effective steps to amend their statutes, ordinances, or other statutory provisions governing it to bring the same in accordance with these regulations."
Is it not an open intervention and infringement on the autonomy of states and HEI? This clause shall be removed.
Clause 10.0: There are two critical aspects in it, one is about the criteria of eligibility of Vice- Chancellor post and the second is about the procedure for formation of search cum selection committee for appointing Vice- Chancellors.
Hitherto, professors having long experience of above 10 years is the basic criteria of eligibility of Vice-Chancellor post. Draft Regulations 2025 of UGC says as follows,
"… (i) a Professor in an HEI or (ii) at a senior level in reputed research or academic administrative organizations or (iii)at a senior level in industry, public administration, public policy and/or public sector undertakings, with a proven track record of significant academic or scholarly contributions, shall be eligible to be appointed as Vice-Chancellor."
This is a very dangerous move as bureaucratic approach will kill the spirit of academics. Therefore, eminent academicians only should be considered for the post of Vice-Chancellor.
The second is about the Search cum Selection Committee. Draft Regulations 2025 of UGC says as follows,
"… The following shall be the constitution of the Search cum Selection Committee. 
a) a nominee of the Visitor/Chancellor, who shall be the Chairperson of the Search cum Selection Committee. 
b) a nominee of the Chairman, University Grants Commission. 
c) a nominee of the apex body of the university such as Syndicate/Senate/Executive Council / Board of Management/ Equivalent Body of the University."
This means that Clause 10.0 gives the supreme power at the hands of the central government while selecting Vice-Chancellors. If these UGC regulations come into practise, then this will pave the way for all out Centralisation, Commercialisation, Privatisation and Communalisation of Higher Education. Therefore, Clause 10 has to be completely dropped.
Clause 11.0: Clause 11.0 of Draft Regulations 2025 goes as follows,
"…If any HEI violates the provisions of these regulations, the Commission shall constitute an enquiry committee to look into the violations.  If the violations are established by the enquiry committee set up by the Commission, the HEI shall be:
(a) Debarred from participating in UGC schemes.
(b) Debarred from offering degree programmes.
(c) Debarred from offering ODL and online mode programmes.
(d) Removed from the list of HEIs maintained under Sections 2(f) and 12B of UGC Act 1956. 
The HEI shall be subjected to one or more of the above actions. Further, UGC may take additional punitive actions as per the decision of the Commission on a case-to-case basis."
This is rather a very autocratic provision and also derogatory for an HEI’s/universities. It is tantamount to real violation and infringement on freedom and democracy of HEI/universities. Therefore, this clause is to be dropped.
Clause 8.0: Clause 8.0 deals about contractual appointment of teachers. Clause 8.0 of Draft Regulations 2025 goes as follows,
Draft Regulations 2025 doesn’t utter a single word about long services rendered by Guest Lecturers and doesn’t show any concern on them. It just legalizes it. Contractual appointees would be subjected to the pressure of the authority of the HEIs and so to say the party in power.  They would be converted into pawns at the hands of the power that be for their renewal. This would vitiate the democratic atmosphere of the campus. Therefore, this clause is to be dropped and instead UGC should insist the regularisation of teachers with immediate effect and also should arrange and provide sufficient financial grant with immediate effect.
Clauses 3.2 & 3.3: Clauses 3.2 & 3.3 would allow recruitment of teachers in disciplines/subjects of their PhD or NET/SET irrespective of their disciplines/subjects in UG & PG. Rather this will help further commercialisation of higher education and bring down whatever standard is still prevailing in higher education. This clause shall be dropped.
Clause 4.1: Clause 4.1 undermines a PG degree and makes it virtually redundant. This would also seriously hamper teaching and research. Therefore, this clause is to be dropped.
 Clause 9.0: Clause 9.0 recommends creation of “Professor of Practice,” a position designed more to serve corporate interests than academy. This would ultimately lower the standard of teaching and marginalize pedagogical excellence. Therefore, to maintain standard academicians only shall be recruited as Professors. Therefore, this clause is to be dropped.
Clauses 3.8 gives emphasis on the parameters like industry-oriented or sponsored research, high-impact publications, consultancy, student internships or project supervision, Indian Knowledge system (IKS), digital content creation for MOOCs, startups etc. for recruitment of teachers. These would largely promote saffronization, privatization and commercialization of education. Therefore, this clause is to be dropped.
The fact is above all should be left to the wisdom of the respective state and Universities/HEI’s and there is no need of UGC to laydown regulations in these domains.
---
*With All-India Save Education Committee (AISEC)

Labels

Comments

Pradeep Mohapatra said…
Congratulations Gujarat Chapter of the AISEC for the right and timely step taken! Very inspiring for all of us too.
January 25, 2025
Post a Comment

TRENDING

Covid-19: The joker in the pack – is it diverting attention from real public health issues?

By Dr Amitav Banerjee MD  As hyped by the media, Covid-19 cases continue to rise in the country, and the Union Health Ministry has asked several states and union territories, including Delhi, to put preventive measures in place. As of 28 May 2025, India recorded 1,621 active cases, with Kerala, Maharashtra, Delhi, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, and Karnataka accounting for over 90 percent of total active infections.
1 comment
Read more

Victim to cricketing politics, Alvin Kalicharan was a most organized left handed batsman

By Harsh Thakor* On March 21st Alvin Kalicharan celebrates his 75th birthday. Sadly, his exploits have been forgotten or overlooked. Arguably no left handed batsman was technically sounder or more organized than this little man. Kalicharan was classed as a left-handed version of Rohan Kanhai. Possibly no left-handed batsmen to such a degree blend technical perfection with artistry and power.
Post a Comment
Read more

Pandemic failures: How conflicts of interest and politics undermined science and accountability

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD*   The USA was the bellwether of the world during the Covid-19 pandemic. Dr Anthony Fauci, who headed the USA’s Covid-19 task force, became a medical dictator whom the world followed blindly. He even went to the extent of saying that “he is the science,” and attacks on him were attacks on science. He was instrumental in recommending most of the Covid-19 protocols, such as masking, social distancing, lockdowns, and mass vaccinations—including for those who had recovered from natural infections and children. Most of these measures had no scientific evidence and caused immense collateral harm without any benefit. He had to admit during Senate hearings in the USA that there was no evidence for measures like social distancing , and that they just made them up!
Post a Comment
Read more

Savitribai Phule: The mother of modern education and pioneer of Indian feminism

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  In the pantheon of India’s social reformers, Savitribai Phule stands tall as a beacon of education, empowerment and resistance. Often called the “Mother of Modern Education in India,” Savitribai was not only the country’s first female teacher but also a fearless feminist and a relentless social reformer who dared to question the oppressive norms of her time. Her life’s mission was clear: to educate the uneducated, uplift the downtrodden, and liberate women from the shackles of patriarchy and caste.
Post a Comment
Read more

How Madhya Pradesh's reservoir contracting system weighs heavily against fisherfolk

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  Water sources such as ponds, rivers, and reservoirs are essential parts of our water wealth. These water bodies host a variety of fish species that ensure food security for millio and provide a livelihood for fishing communities. To secure the rights of local fishers over water and its resources, governmental support is essential. Today, however, human-made disruptions outweigh natural ones, adversely affecting communities dependent on water resources.
1 comment
Read more

Ex-civil servants slam charges against Prof Ali Khan Mahmudabad, calls arrest 'outrageous and absurd'

By A Representative  In a strong and unequivocal statement, the Constitutional Conduct Group (CCG), comprising 79 retired civil servants , has condemned the arrest of Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad of Ashoka University under India’s new criminal code for his social media commentary on Operation Sindoor.
Post a Comment
Read more

Old bias, new excuses: How western media misrepresents India’s anti-terror strikes

By Gajanan Khergamker  The recent Indian military strikes on Pakistan, dubbed Operation Sindoor, have sparked a storm of international media coverage. Several prominent outlets have portrayed India as the aggressor in the escalating conflict, raising concerns over biased reporting. This commentary critiques coverage by foreign media outlets such as The New York Times , Reuters, BBC, and CNN, which have often been accused of framing India’s actions as escalatory while downplaying or omitting critical context regarding Pakistan’s role in fostering terrorism. By examining historical patterns and current geopolitical dynamics, this analysis highlights the recurring selective framing, omission of evidence, and a tendency to favor narratives aligned with Western geopolitical interests over factual nuance.
Post a Comment
Read more

Controversy over last rites of Maoist leader Keshava Rao and others in Chhattisgarh

By Harsh Thakor*  The last rites of Nambala Keshava Rao alias Basavaraju—General Secretary of the banned CPI (Maoist)—and seven other Maoist cadres killed in an encounter on May 21 were conducted by police in Chhattisgarh’s Narayanpur district on May 26. This decision has sparked controversy, with family members and human rights advocates alleging denial of due rights to claim and perform the final rites of their relatives.
Post a Comment
Read more

Colaba jetty ruling: A judicial nod to support Mumbai's balanced urban growth

By Gajanan Khergamker*  The Supreme Court’s refusal to stay the construction of the Colaba passenger jetty and terminal near the Gateway of India is a decision firmly anchored in legal precedent, pragmatic reasoning, and a nuanced balance of competing interests.
Post a Comment
Read more