Skip to main content

Misleading ideology being created: Babasaheb 'appreciated' the ideology of Hindutva

By Ram Puniyani* 
As the insult directed at Babasaheb Ambedkar by Amit Shah in the Lok Sabha draws widespread criticism from across the country, right-wing Hindu nationalist ideologues are attempting to construct a narrative that aligns Ambedkar’s ideology with the politics of figures like Savarkar, the RSS, and the BJP. (Balbir Punj on X: "The resurrection of Dr Ambedkar" / X). They selectively quote from Ambedkar’s vast body of work to paint a misleading picture suggesting that Babasaheb appreciated the ideology of Hindutva.
One such claim highlights Ambedkar’s praise for Swami Shraddhanand as “the greatest and most sincere champion of the Untouchables.” However, they conveniently ignore the fact that Shraddhanand was involved in the Shuddhi movement, aimed at converting Muslims to Hinduism. This practice angered Muslim clerics. Ambedkar responded to Shuddhi by stating, “If the Hindu society desires to survive, it must think not of adding to its numbers but increasing its solidarity, and that means the abolition of caste. The abolition of castes is the real sangathan of the Hindus, and when sangathan is achieved by abolishing castes, Shuddhi will be unnecessary.” This stance was in stark contrast to the Tanzim movement by the Tablighi Jamaat, which sought to convert Hindus to Islam. Shraddhanand later joined the Indian National Congress but was also a part of the Hindu Sangathan movement under the revitalized Hindu Mahasabha, which was committed to the idea of a Hindu Nation.
Another narrative being promoted equates Ambedkar and Savarkar, claiming they were “two sides of the same coin.” While it is true that Savarkar started the Patit Pavan temple, which allowed Dalits to enter temples, Ambedkar opposed this move. He believed it would create separate temples visited only by Dalits. An editorial in the April 12, 1929 issue of Bahishkrit Bharat stated that Ambedkar had opposed the Patit Pavan temple from the beginning, arguing it would eventually be labeled as a temple exclusively for the untouchables. Ambedkar did acknowledge Savarkar’s efforts but deemed them irrelevant.
Hindutva proponents also exaggerate Ambedkar’s disagreements with the Congress. Some argue that Nehru became authoritarian after the deaths of Gandhi and Patel, sidelining the opposition. Amit Shah claimed that Ambedkar resigned from Nehru’s Cabinet over differences on Article 370, foreign policy, and the treatment of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. However, the primary reason for Ambedkar’s resignation was the shabby treatment of the Hindu Code Bill, which faced massive opposition, including demonstrations by RSS volunteers. The protests culminated in a large rally at Ramlila Maidan on December 11, 1949, where effigies of Ambedkar and Nehru were burned.
The RSS’s mouthpiece, Organiser (December 7, 1949), stated, “We oppose the Hindu Code Bill. We oppose it because it is a derogatory measure based on alien and immoral principles. It is not a Hindu Code Bill. It is anything but Hindu.” This aggressive campaign delayed and diluted the bill, causing Ambedkar immense disappointment and leading to his resignation.
The ideological differences between Ambedkar and Hindutva politics are stark. In 1927, Ambedkar publicly burned the Manusmriti, which he saw as a symbol of caste oppression. In contrast, RSS ideologues like M.S. Golwalkar praised the Manusmriti. Savarkar also supported Chaturvarnya and extolled the Manusmriti, calling it “the scripture most worshipable after the Vedas for our Hindu Nation.” He added, “Even today, the rules followed by crores of Hindus in their lives are based on Manusmriti. Today, Manusmriti is Hindu Law.”
Ambedkar’s opposition to Hindutva ideology was unequivocal. On October 13, 1935, in a meeting at Yeola near Nasik, he declared, “I will not die as a person who calls himself a Hindu!” He argued that Hinduism lacked liberty, compassion, and equality. In his revised edition of Thoughts on Pakistan, Ambedkar opposed the formation of Islamic Pakistan, warning that it could pave the way for a Hindu Raj or Rashtra, which he deemed a catastrophe.
Despite pressures to convert to Sikhism or Islam, Ambedkar chose Buddhism after careful study. Dr. Moonje of the Hindu Mahasabha reportedly struck a pact with Ambedkar, agreeing not to oppose his conversion if he avoided converting to Islam.
Today, the BJP seeks to appropriate Ambedkar’s legacy by erecting statues and building an international museum in his memory. While these are symbolic gestures, they fail to honor Ambedkar’s core values. The BJP’s Mandal vs. Kamandal politics starkly contrasts with Ambedkar’s commitment to social justice. For instance, when the Mandal Commission was implemented, the BJP resorted to Kamandal politics. Advani’s Rath Yatra, part of this strategy, led to the fall of V.P. Singh’s government.
Although the Congress and Hindu Mahasabha opposed Ambedkar in the Lok Sabha elections, it was Congress that later ensured his place in the Rajya Sabha and appointed him as chairman of the drafting committee of the Indian Constitution. The BJP’s attempt to co-opt Ambedkar into the Hindutva fold is a desperate and fabricated effort to claim legitimacy from a man who stood firmly against the idea of a Hindu Rashtra. The irony is glaring: those who advocate for a Hindu Nation now attempt to project Ambedkar, a staunch opponent of Hindu Rashtra and a proponent of a secular, democratic republic, as part of their ideological parivar.
---

Comments

TRENDING

Aurangzeb’s last will recorded by his Maulvi: Allah shouldn't make anyone emperor

By Mohan Guruswamy  Aurangzeb’s grave is a simple slab open to the sky lying along the roadside at Khuldabad near Aurangabad. I once stopped by to marvel at the tomb of an Emperor of India whose empire was as large as Ashoka the Great's. It was only post 1857 when Victoria's domain exceeded this. The epitaph reads: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast." (The rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave) The modest tomb of Aurangzeb is perhaps the least recognised legacies of the Mughal Emperor who ruled the land for fifty eventful years. He was not a builder having expended his long tenure in war and conquest. Towards the end of his reign and life, he realised the futility of it all. He wrote: "Allah should not make anyone an emperor. The most unfortunate person is he who becomes one." Aurangzeb’s last will was re...

Beyond his riding skill, Karl Umrigar was admired for his radiance, sportsmanship, and affability

By Harsh Thakor*  Karl Umrigar's name remains etched in the annals of Indian horse racing, a testament to a talent tragically cut short. An accident on the racetrack at the tender age of nineteen robbed India of a rider on the cusp of greatness. Had he survived, there's little doubt he would have ascended to international stature, possibly becoming the greatest Indian jockey ever. Even 46 years after his death, his name shines brightly, reminiscent of an inextinguishable star. His cousin, Pesi Shroff, himself blossomed into one of the most celebrated jockeys in Indian horse racing.

PUCL files complaint with SC against Gujarat police, municipal authorities for 'unlawful' demolitions, custodial 'violence'

By A Representative   The People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has lodged a formal complaint with the Chief Justice of India, urging the Supreme Court to initiate suo-moto contempt proceedings against the police and municipal authorities in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The complaint alleges that these officials have engaged in unlawful demolitions and custodial violence, in direct violation of a Supreme Court order issued in November 2024.

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

Haven't done a good deed, inner soul is cursing me as sinner: Aurangzeb's last 'will'

Counterview Desk The Tomb of Aurangzeb, the last of the strong Mughal emperors, located in Khuldabad, Aurangabad district, Maharashtra, has this epitaph inscribed on it: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e maa ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast" (the rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave).

CPM’s evaluation of BJP reflects its political character and its reluctance to take on battle against neo-fascism

By Harsh Thakor*  A controversial debate has emerged in the revolutionary camp regarding the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s categorization of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Many Communists criticize the CPM’s reluctance to label the BJP as a fascist party and India as a fascist state. Various factors must be considered to arrive at an accurate assessment. Understanding the original meaning and historical development of fascism is essential, as well as analyzing how it manifests in the present global and national context.

State Human Rights Commission directs authorities to uphold environmental rights in Vadodara's Vishwamitri River Project

By A Representative  The Gujarat State Human Rights Commission (GSHRC) has ordered state and Vadodara municipal authorities to strictly comply with environmental and human rights safeguards during the Vishwamitri River Rejuvenation Project, stressing that the river’s degradation disproportionately affects marginalized communities and violates citizens’ rights to a healthy environment.  The Commission mandated an immediate halt to ecologically destructive practices, rehabilitation of affected communities, transparent adherence to National Green Tribunal (NGT) orders, and public consultations with experts and residents.   The order follows the Concerned Citizens of Vadodara coalition—environmentalists, ecologists, and urban planners—submitting a detailed letter to authorities, amplifying calls for accountability. The group warned that current plans to “re-section” and “desilt” the river contradict the NGT’s 2021 Vishwamitri River Action Plan, which prioritizes floodpla...

How polarization between different ideological trends within the communist movement sharpened in India

By Harsh Thakor*  This article is a rejoinder to A Note on Slogans of “Left Unity,” “Unity of the Communist Revolutionaries” and “Mass Line” by Umair Ahmed, published on the Nazariya blog .

Vadodara citizens urge authorities to adhere to environmental mandates in Vishwamitri River Rejuvenation Project

By A Representative   A coalition of environmental activists, ecologists, and urban planners in Vadodara has issued an urgent appeal to state and municipal authorities, demanding strict compliance with court-mandated guidelines for the upcoming Vishwamitri River rejuvenation project. Scheduled to commence in March 2025, the initiative aims to mitigate flooding and restore the river, but citizens warn that current plans risk violating National Green Tribunal (NGT) orders and jeopardizing the river’s fragile ecosystem, home to endangered species like crocodiles and Indian Softshell Turtles.  

Implications of deaths of Maoist leaders G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya in Chhattisgarh

By Harsh Thakor*  In the wake of recent security operations in southern Chhattisgarh, two senior Maoist leaders, G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya, were killed. These operations, which took place amidst a historically significant Maoist presence, resulted in the deaths of 31 individuals on March 20th and 16 more three days prior.