Skip to main content

Is IMF shaping Odisha's 'development'? Odia asmita under Hindutva politics

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak 
‘Odia 'Asmita' (pride or self-respect) played a significant role in turning the electoral tide in favour of the BJP in the state. Hindutva politics successfully mobilised the masses and captured both the state and its government by leveraging Odia 'Asmita' as a key tool in their election campaign during the last state assembly elections on June 4, 2024.
This led to the formation of the 17th Assembly in the state. Different forms of 'othering' strategies are central to Hindutva politics during and after elections. Under the banner of Odia 'Asmita' (pride), Hindutva leadership successfully consolidated Odia voters against a civil servant-turned-politician who was merely following instructions from Mr. Naveen Patnaik, the President of the Biju Janata Dal (BJD).
During the election campaign, no one explicitly defined 'Odia Asmita.' However, for the first time, the Deputy Chief Minister of Odisha, Mr. Kanak Vardhan Singh Deo, articulated its meaning while addressing the Sambad CEO Conclave-2024 in Bhubaneswar on June 14, 2024. He defined 'Odia Asmita' as 'Odias taking control of their own destiny through their elected representatives by taking the decision-making process of the government into their hands. It also means Odisha making environmentally sustainable decisions for its own future.' Mr. Singh Deo further emphasized, 'No outside forces shall be allowed to exploit our forests and natural resources. While my government is committed to its ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) goals, I expect industries to adhere to their ESG commitments as well.' 
Mr. Singh Deo did not clarify or define who qualifies as an outsider and who as an insider. For instance, is a civil servant working for the state under the rules and regulations of the governments of Odisha and India considered an outsider? Is a person married into Odia family deemed an outsider? Who, then, is an outsider? Such ambiguity reflects a form of "politics of othering," which lies at the core of Hindutva politics.
At first glance, Mr. Singh Deo’s conceptualization of 'Odia Asmita' appears unproblematic. However, a closer examination of his statement reveals a disregard for the history of 'Odia Asmita' and the struggles of the Odia people. From fighting to establish Odia as an independent language to demanding the creation of Odisha as a state based on linguistic identity, this history is deeply rooted in the assertion of Odia pride and autonomy that Mr Singh Deo and his Hindutva politics undermines.
Mr. Singh Deo’s statement seems to imply that Odias began taking control of democracy, decision-making processes, and governance for the first time only after the BJP came to power in the state. This narrative overlooks the relentless efforts of Odia people, who have long fought to safeguard their environment and natural resources from corporate exploitation.
Contrary to the ideals of 'Odia Asmita,' the newly formed BJP government has been leasing mines to corporations whose interests fundamentally oppose those of the state and its people. Moreover, the BJP government has awarded major construction projects in the state to private companies with questionable records. In this context, 'Odia Asmita' appears to have been used merely as an electoral strategy to advance Hindutva politics in Odisha. So far, the BJP government has done nothing to meaningfully promote and deepen 'Odia Asmita' either within or beyond the state.
The BJP government in Odisha follows in the footsteps of the previous BJD government. The Fiscal Strategy Report (2023-24) and (2024-25), which provide the framework for Odisha’s budget, are not primarily shaped by the policies and politics of either the former BJD government or the current BJP government. Instead, they are influenced by the IMF’s South Asia Regional Training and Technical Assistance Center (SARTTAC). According to the Department of Finance, Government of Odisha, this institution has developed a Medium-Term Fiscal Framework (MTFF) to support annual budget formulation and medium-term fiscal planning. The Department of Finance, Government of Odisha further states that “the objective of developing the MTFF is to use it as a reference for the preparation of the annual budget and fiscal planning over the subsequent two years.” This underscores the external influence on fiscal policymaking in Odisha, potentially limiting the role of state governments in independently shaping the state’s financial direction.
The budget is not merely an economic statement; it embodies a vision for economic growth, development, and planning, shaping the state's future, its people, and their developmental destiny. More importantly, it is a political declaration aimed at the economic empowerment of the people. However, both the previous BJD government and the current BJP government have undermined 'Odia Asmita' by outsourcing this fundamental responsibility to the IMF and its South Asia team based in New Delhi. This approach reflects the disregard of both governments for the people of Odisha, as if the state lacks the talent and expertise necessary to formulate its own budget. When a government outsources such a critical duty, it essentially functions as an "outsourcing government," serving the interests of its masters in Washington, D.C., rather than the people of the state. Far from strengthening 'Odia Asmita,' Hindutva politics, practice and ethos of governance diminishes it, eroding the state and government’s autonomy and pride.
Hindutva politics further undermines the inclusive and internationalist character of 'Odia Asmita,' which is a collective celebration deeply rooted in the historical foundation of "Odisha for all." Odias revere their deity as 'Lord Jagannath' (Jagatnatha, or Lord of the Universe), reflecting a profound sense of internationalism that defines 'Odia Asmita.' This universal outlook offers a far greater and more inclusive vision of identity than the parochial politics of "othering" promoted by Hindutva and its visionless leadership in the state.
'Odia Asmita' is a collective celebration of belonging, an ethos that unites the people of Odisha. It is imperative for the people of Odisha to reclaim their 'Asmita' from all reactionary forces that seek to undermine their inclusive state and peaceful society.

Comments

TRENDING

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी: जल जीवन मिशन के लक्ष्य को पाने समन्वित प्रयास जरूरी

- राज कुमार सिन्हा*  जल संसाधन से जुड़ी स्थायी समिति ने वर्तमान लोकसभा सत्र में पेश रिपोर्ट में बताया है कि "नल से जल" मिशन में राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी साबित हुए हैं। जबकि देश के 11 राज्यों में शत-प्रतिशत ग्रामीणों को नल से जल आपूर्ति शुरू कर दी गई है। रिपोर्ट में समिति ने केंद्र सरकार को सिफारिश की है कि मिशन पुरा करने में राज्य सरकारों की समस्याओं पर गौर किया जाए। 

Aurangzeb’s last will recorded by his Maulvi: Allah shouldn't make anyone emperor

By Mohan Guruswamy  Aurangzeb’s grave is a simple slab open to the sky lying along the roadside at Khuldabad near Aurangabad. I once stopped by to marvel at the tomb of an Emperor of India whose empire was as large as Ashoka the Great's. It was only post 1857 when Victoria's domain exceeded this. The epitaph reads: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast." (The rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave) The modest tomb of Aurangzeb is perhaps the least recognised legacies of the Mughal Emperor who ruled the land for fifty eventful years. He was not a builder having expended his long tenure in war and conquest. Towards the end of his reign and life, he realised the futility of it all. He wrote: "Allah should not make anyone an emperor. The most unfortunate person is he who becomes one." Aurangzeb’s last will was re...

PUCL files complaint with SC against Gujarat police, municipal authorities for 'unlawful' demolitions, custodial 'violence'

By A Representative   The People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has lodged a formal complaint with the Chief Justice of India, urging the Supreme Court to initiate suo-moto contempt proceedings against the police and municipal authorities in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The complaint alleges that these officials have engaged in unlawful demolitions and custodial violence, in direct violation of a Supreme Court order issued in November 2024.

Incarcerated for 2,424 days, Sudhir Dhawale combines Ambedkarism with Marxism

By Harsh Thakor   One of those who faced incarceration both under Congress and BJP rule, Sudhir Dhawale was arrested on June 6, 2018, one of the first six among the 16 people held in what became known as the Elgar Parishad case. After spending 2,424 days in incarceration, he became the ninth to be released from jail—alongside Rona Wilson, who walked free with him on January 24. The Bombay High Court granted them bail, citing the prolonged imprisonment without trial as a key factor. I will always remember the moments we spent together in Mumbai between 1998 and 2006, during public meetings and protests across a wide range of issues. Sudhir was unwavering in his commitment to Maoism, upholding the torch of B.R. Ambedkar, and resisting Brahmanical fascism. He sought to bridge the philosophies of Marxism and Ambedkarism. With boundless energy, he waved the banner of liberation, becoming the backbone of the revolutionary democratic centre in Mumbai and Maharashtra. He dedicated himself ...

Censor Board's bullying delays 'Phule': A blow to India's democratic spirit

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  A film based on the life and legacy of Jyotiba Phule and Savitribai Phule was expected to release today. Instead, its release has been pushed to the last week of April. The reason? Protests by self-proclaimed guardians of caste pride—certain Brahmin groups—and forced edits demanded by a thoroughly discredited Censor Board.

How Mumbai University crumbles: Not just its buildings

By Rosamma Thomas*  In recent days, the news from the University of Mumbai has been far from inspiring – clumps of plaster have fallen off the ceiling at the CD Deshmukh Bhavan, and it was good fortune that no one was injured; creepy crawlies were found in the water dispenser that students use to collect drinking water, and timely warning videos circulated by vigilant students have kept people safe so far.

CPM’s evaluation of BJP reflects its political character and its reluctance to take on battle against neo-fascism

By Harsh Thakor*  A controversial debate has emerged in the revolutionary camp regarding the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s categorization of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Many Communists criticize the CPM’s reluctance to label the BJP as a fascist party and India as a fascist state. Various factors must be considered to arrive at an accurate assessment. Understanding the original meaning and historical development of fascism is essential, as well as analyzing how it manifests in the present global and national context.

Implications of deaths of Maoist leaders G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya in Chhattisgarh

By Harsh Thakor*  In the wake of recent security operations in southern Chhattisgarh, two senior Maoist leaders, G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya, were killed. These operations, which took place amidst a historically significant Maoist presence, resulted in the deaths of 31 individuals on March 20th and 16 more three days prior.

Akhilesh Yadav’s boycott of Dainik Jagran: A step towards accountability or political rhetoric?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat  Akhilesh Yadav has called for a total boycott of Dainik Jagran, a newspaper owned by the Gupta family. He also declared that the Samajwadi Party will no longer participate in any panel discussions organized by a media channel allegedly controlled by the family or relatives of the omnipresent Rajiv Shukla. Akhilesh Yadav and the Samajwadi Party are well aware that Dainik Jagran has long been antagonistic to Dalit-Bahujan interests. The newspaper represents a Bania-Brahmin corporate and ideological enterprise.