Skip to main content

Ken-Betwa Link Project: How Bundelkhand will benefit is not clear

By Bharat Dogra 
The foundation stone ceremony of Ken-Betwa River Link Project (KBRLP) took place on December 25 in the middle of a big publicity drive for the controversial Rs. 44,605 crore (one crore=10 million) project. Officially this project is publicized to have several benefits, including generating 103 MW hydroelectric power and 27 MW solar power, irrigating 10.62 lakh (10 lakh=one million) hectares of land and providing drinking water to 62 lakh people. The project involves the construction of the Daudhan Dam on the Ken river to take some of its declared “surplus” water to the Betwa river using a 221-km canal. The project is sought to be completed by a Special Project Vehicle (SPV), the Ken-Betwa Link Project Authority and a 20-member national steering committee. The topmost officially stated benefit of this project is that it will contribute a lot to ending the water scarcity of Bundelkhand , a region spread over 14 districts of Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh which has often been in news due to water scarcity. The government also sees the KBRLP as a beginning of a massive project to interlink many more rivers. As the first of this series of projects, the stakes for KBRLP are very high for the government and the powerful construction lobby.
Unfortunately, the government has chosen to ignore very serious adverse aspects associated with this project which several independent experts and official committees such as the Central Empowered Committee of the Supreme Court have pointed out. These objections make it clear that the government cannot justify the construction of this project on grounds of viability and real assured benefits, and it is being promoted more as a prestige project, the starting point of the much wider project of linking many rivers.
Despite the entire publicity blitz some basic questions regarding the viability and desirability of the project have not yet been answered in a satisfactory way by the authorities. The officially stated entire basis of the project is that the surplus water of Ken river is transferred to the Betwa river, but the availability of surplus in Ken river or in the Ken basin has not been established. In fact the Ken river as well as some of its tributaries have been very badly ravaged by sand mining in recent time, and having visited the region several times and discussed with local people, the main issue regarding the Ken river is that it should be protected from sand mining and should be given time to recover from all the past ravaging of the river. The livelihoods of several riverside farmers, particularly those of kevats and other riverside communities who have been mentioned in mythology with a lot of respect, have also been ravaged by sand mining and their famed farming based on making very skillful use of land near river for cultivating high quality fruits and vegetables has also suffered a lot. The Ken river needs protection and these farmers also need protection from sand mining. While the basic challenge ahead is to protect this river and the livelihoods of people related to this river, the authorities are instead going ahead with transferring the water which is a very harmful step. It is shocking that this basically undesirable and unviable step is being taken despite the fact that this also involves a lot of displacement of villagers, very large-scale deforestation and other harm to environment and livelihoods.   
One frequently mentioned objection has been that the KBRLP involves felling about 23 lakh (2.3 million) trees, mostly in the Panna Tiger Reserve. Some estimates of trees threatened by this project are even higher. The Central Empowered Committee of the Supreme Court ( CEC) noted—“The Sub-Committee of the Forest Advisory Committee in its Report has stated that the total number of trees of 20 cm. and above which are to be felled is around 23 lakh.” The reference here is to girth of trees.  As between the time of this estimate and actual implementation the number of trees of this or higher girth can increase significantly, therefore higher estimates are relevant for more recent times. The CEC estimated a loss of 10500 hectares of wild life habitat in the Panna Tiger Reserve.   
As against these heavy ecological costs, the claims of ending water scarcity in Bundelkhand being made for this project are highly suspect. As pointed out by Ravi Chopra, founder of People’s Science Institute which was involved in studying this issue, when the Ken and Betwa basins are adjacent to each other, they have similar weather and rainfall patterns, and experience droughts and floods simultaneously, the concept of surplus to deficit area is meaningless. As another expert Himanshu Thakkar, founder of South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People has pointed out the hydrologcal data used to justify such a huge project is not shared in a transparent way and appears to be dated.
 Several local people, even some former government officials, have repeatedly questioned the basic premise of this project: that the Ken has surplus water for transferring to the Betwa. Any project based on unconfirmed claims only sows the seeds of future problems and tensions.    
This project is being propagated as highly beneficial to Bundelkhand but studies of water scarcity  in Bundelkhand have mentioned deforestation as a leading cause of water scarcity while the KBRLP involves the felling of 23 lakh trees, perhaps even more. These studies include a study by the Vigyan Shiksha Kendra and IIT Delhi of the water scarcity of Bundelkhand region. A key person for this study was Dr. Bhartendu Prakash, founder of Vigyan Shiksha Kendra who has also voiced his opposition to KBRLP. He followed up his first study with another updated one in which he has documented several alternative approaches based on water conservation specially suited to local conditions. 
How Bundelkhand will benefit is not clear at all. Nearly ten thousand people spread over about ten or more villages are likely to be displaced as per the details of this project. The multiple problems caused by dam construction to submerged villages and other nearby villages in Bundelkhand are now widely known following their detailed depiction in widely praised, award–winning Hindi novels ‘Doob’ and ‘Paar’, written by Virendra Jain. From time to time some of the more destructive floods in Bundelkhand have been blamed on the arbitrary release of excess water by dams, as I saw while covering floods in Chitrakut and elsewhere. In addition the very long canal this project envisages for linking will also involve several environmental disruptions along its long route.
Bundelkhand is known for its rich legacy of traditional water sources. For example, tanks constructed by the Chandela kings and others in many parts of Bundelkhand. The wealth of traditional water sources here has been a source of much discussion for their excellent planning and construction suited to local conditions. The repair and restoration and proper maintenance of these sources can play an essential role in solving water scarcity. Some time back when I travelled from Chirakut to Allahabad, I could see several such water conservation efforts which are giving good results even after a very long time. Other kinds of water conservation works including better and more successful planting of indigenous species of trees, better protection of remaining natural forests, repair and restoration of wells and efforts for rejuvenation of rivers can also contribute much to solving water scarcity. 
 Very encouraging results achieved by several small-scale water conservation and rainwater harvesting projects by several voluntary organisations of this region have established the importance of such initiatives. The government can take up thousands of such initiatives at a lower budget than that of KBRLP.
It will be disastrous to opt for such a project which has no clear justification and yet will cause a lot of displacement and deforesting, wasting thousands of crores of rupees.
A letter signed by 30 experts and activists had been in the news earlier as it registered a strong protest against this project and the arbitrariness involved in its implementation. This letter says, “The project has been plagued by sloppy, intentionally misleading and inadequate impact assessments, procedural violations and misinformation at every step of the way.” The signatories included Amita Bavaskar, a former member of the Forest Advisory Committee and EAS Sarma, former Secretary, Government of India. This letter says that basic information about the water availability in the two rivers has not been made available, and other basic information has been held back from project-affected people.( Open Letter of Protest on Ken Betwa Project to MOEF—SANDRP) (Violations of Ken Betwa EIA and Public Hearing Process).
There is a lot of literature at world level on problems created by huge water transfer schemes instead of relying on local conservation of water. This is all the more true of the Bundelkhand region which has such a rich tradition of water conservation from ancient times. Certainly very good alternatives are available and the government should give up the KBRLP while agreeing to spend this budget on other proven ways of water conservation and on various aspects of welfare and livelihood support of people. An excellent, ecologically protective source of minor irrigation is the Mangal Turbine invented by a farmer scientist Mangal Singh from a village of Bundelkhand. It is this kind of promising initiatives of local people which should be promoted instead of taking up such highly wasteful and non-viable projects as KBRLP. 
---
The writer is Honorary Convener, Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books include "Man over Machine (Gandhian Ideas For Our Times)", "Protecting Earth for Children", "A Day in 2071" and "Navjeevan"

Comments

TRENDING

Aurangzeb’s last will recorded by his Maulvi: Allah shouldn't make anyone emperor

By Mohan Guruswamy  Aurangzeb’s grave is a simple slab open to the sky lying along the roadside at Khuldabad near Aurangabad. I once stopped by to marvel at the tomb of an Emperor of India whose empire was as large as Ashoka the Great's. It was only post 1857 when Victoria's domain exceeded this. The epitaph reads: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast." (The rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave) The modest tomb of Aurangzeb is perhaps the least recognised legacies of the Mughal Emperor who ruled the land for fifty eventful years. He was not a builder having expended his long tenure in war and conquest. Towards the end of his reign and life, he realised the futility of it all. He wrote: "Allah should not make anyone an emperor. The most unfortunate person is he who becomes one." Aurangzeb’s last will was re...

Beyond his riding skill, Karl Umrigar was admired for his radiance, sportsmanship, and affability

By Harsh Thakor*  Karl Umrigar's name remains etched in the annals of Indian horse racing, a testament to a talent tragically cut short. An accident on the racetrack at the tender age of nineteen robbed India of a rider on the cusp of greatness. Had he survived, there's little doubt he would have ascended to international stature, possibly becoming the greatest Indian jockey ever. Even 46 years after his death, his name shines brightly, reminiscent of an inextinguishable star. His cousin, Pesi Shroff, himself blossomed into one of the most celebrated jockeys in Indian horse racing.

PUCL files complaint with SC against Gujarat police, municipal authorities for 'unlawful' demolitions, custodial 'violence'

By A Representative   The People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has lodged a formal complaint with the Chief Justice of India, urging the Supreme Court to initiate suo-moto contempt proceedings against the police and municipal authorities in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The complaint alleges that these officials have engaged in unlawful demolitions and custodial violence, in direct violation of a Supreme Court order issued in November 2024.

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

Haven't done a good deed, inner soul is cursing me as sinner: Aurangzeb's last 'will'

Counterview Desk The Tomb of Aurangzeb, the last of the strong Mughal emperors, located in Khuldabad, Aurangabad district, Maharashtra, has this epitaph inscribed on it: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e maa ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast" (the rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave).

CPM’s evaluation of BJP reflects its political character and its reluctance to take on battle against neo-fascism

By Harsh Thakor*  A controversial debate has emerged in the revolutionary camp regarding the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s categorization of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Many Communists criticize the CPM’s reluctance to label the BJP as a fascist party and India as a fascist state. Various factors must be considered to arrive at an accurate assessment. Understanding the original meaning and historical development of fascism is essential, as well as analyzing how it manifests in the present global and national context.

State Human Rights Commission directs authorities to uphold environmental rights in Vadodara's Vishwamitri River Project

By A Representative  The Gujarat State Human Rights Commission (GSHRC) has ordered state and Vadodara municipal authorities to strictly comply with environmental and human rights safeguards during the Vishwamitri River Rejuvenation Project, stressing that the river’s degradation disproportionately affects marginalized communities and violates citizens’ rights to a healthy environment.  The Commission mandated an immediate halt to ecologically destructive practices, rehabilitation of affected communities, transparent adherence to National Green Tribunal (NGT) orders, and public consultations with experts and residents.   The order follows the Concerned Citizens of Vadodara coalition—environmentalists, ecologists, and urban planners—submitting a detailed letter to authorities, amplifying calls for accountability. The group warned that current plans to “re-section” and “desilt” the river contradict the NGT’s 2021 Vishwamitri River Action Plan, which prioritizes floodpla...

How polarization between different ideological trends within the communist movement sharpened in India

By Harsh Thakor*  This article is a rejoinder to A Note on Slogans of “Left Unity,” “Unity of the Communist Revolutionaries” and “Mass Line” by Umair Ahmed, published on the Nazariya blog .

Vadodara citizens urge authorities to adhere to environmental mandates in Vishwamitri River Rejuvenation Project

By A Representative   A coalition of environmental activists, ecologists, and urban planners in Vadodara has issued an urgent appeal to state and municipal authorities, demanding strict compliance with court-mandated guidelines for the upcoming Vishwamitri River rejuvenation project. Scheduled to commence in March 2025, the initiative aims to mitigate flooding and restore the river, but citizens warn that current plans risk violating National Green Tribunal (NGT) orders and jeopardizing the river’s fragile ecosystem, home to endangered species like crocodiles and Indian Softshell Turtles.  

Implications of deaths of Maoist leaders G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya in Chhattisgarh

By Harsh Thakor*  In the wake of recent security operations in southern Chhattisgarh, two senior Maoist leaders, G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya, were killed. These operations, which took place amidst a historically significant Maoist presence, resulted in the deaths of 31 individuals on March 20th and 16 more three days prior.