Skip to main content

Does BJP recognise that Constitution was the outcome of values that emerged during the freedom movement?

By Ram Puniyani* 
The Indian Parliament spent two days discussing the Indian Constitution. While opposition leaders argued that our Constitution has ample space for enhancing the rights of weaker sections of society, including religious minorities, they are suffering terribly. Muslims have been reduced to second-class citizens. The ruling dispensation, the BJP leaders within Parliament and its ideologues outside, argued that all the ills of society and violations of Constitutional values began with Nehru (Amendment to stop hate speech), continued with Indira Gandhi (Emergency), Rajiv Gandhi (Shah Bano Bill), and culminated with Rahul Gandhi (tearing the bill), all of whom they accused of violating the Constitution's values.
BJP leaders and Hindu nationalist ideologues claim that the Indian Constitution is based on Western values, a colonial imprint on our society; it is a break from India's civilization and culture. They also argue that the Constitution and its application have been used for the appeasement of Muslim minorities for vote bank purposes by the Congress Party.
As we know, the Constitution was the outcome of the values that emerged during the freedom movement. It also considered the long tradition of our civilization. However, the understanding of our civilization differs significantly between those who participated in the freedom movement, those who uphold its ideology, and those who remained aloof from the anti-colonial movement and submitted to British rule. While the freedom movement envisioned India as a plural nation with rich diversities, those who stood aloof saw the civilization as Hindu civilization. For them, pluralism is a diversion and an imposition by the educated, modern leaders.
Even the RSS combine forgets that what they call Hindu civilization undermines the contributions of Jainism, Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, and Sikhism to our civilization. Even the interpretation of Lord Ram, their major icon, varies significantly. Kabir saw the Lord as the Universal spirit, Gandhi saw Him as the protector of all people regardless of their religion, as reflected in his famous saying: "Ishawar Allah Tero Naam" (Allah and Iswar are the same). Jawaharlal Nehru, in "The Discovery of India," saw India, Bharat Mata, as an "ancient palimpsest on which layer upon layer of thought and reverie had been inscribed, and yet no succeeding layer had completely hidden or erased what had been written previously." With great pride, he recalled the rule of Emperor Ashoka, who in many edicts inscribed on stones, spoke of equal treatment for Vedic Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism, and Ajivikas.
This is the core difference between the RSS combine and its ideologues, who view India as exclusively Brahmanical Hindu, and those like Gandhi and Nehru, who see it as a country belonging to all its people. The Indian Constituent Assembly primarily represented the stream that struggled against the British, the national stream, while the RSS was a marginal stream clinging to the idea of "India as a Brahmanical Hindu nation." This began to reflect immediately after the draft of the Indian Constitution. While Ambedkar and Nehru were cautious and emphasized that the implementation of its basic structure should be ensured by those ruling the country, Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, in 1998, formed the Venkatchaliah Commission to review the Constitution. Dr. K.R. Narayanan, then President of India, aptly remarked, "It is not that the Constitution has failed us; it is we who have failed the Constitution!" This is particularly true after the rule of the Modi Government. Although the Constitution has not been formally changed, many from the RSS camp have expressed their desire to do so, without reprimand from the top leadership. This was most blatantly stated to back up their slogan of "400 Par" (More than 400 seats in Parliament), meaning they want so many seats to change the Constitution.
The blatant rise of hate speech, most clearly stated recently by sitting Allahabad High Court Judge Shekhar Kumar Yadav, during a VHP meeting, where he declared, "The country will run as per the wishes of its majority." Justice Yadav made these remarks while addressing the "Constitutional Necessity of Uniform Civil Code." "Only what benefits the welfare and happiness of the majority will be accepted," Yadav said.
Worse than his statement was the support it received from Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath. Mercifully, the Supreme Court has taken cognizance of Yadav's communal hate speech. Who will take cognizance of Yogi's support for him?
Commenting on the current state of affairs, Justice Aspi Chinoy made a very apt comment: "The BJP, being the government at the Centre and having an absolute and overwhelming majority in Parliament, sees no need to alter the de jure status of India as a secular country and Constitution. Being in control of the state and its diverse instrumentalities, it has been able to achieve its goal of undermining India's secular Constitution and introduce a Hindutva-based ethnocracy, even without amending and altering the de jure secular status."
This sectarianism of the ruling BJP goes back to the time when the draft of the Constitution was released. A few days later, the RSS mouthpiece (unofficial) Organiser stated on November 30, 1949: "The worst [thing] about the new Constitution of Bharat is that there is nothing Bharatiya about it… [T]here is no trace of ancient Bharatiya constitutional laws, institutions, nomenclature, and phraseology in it." Meaning that Manusmriti has been ignored by the makers of the Indian Constitution!
The father of Hindu Nationalist politics, V.D. Savarkar, was quoted by Rahul Gandhi during a parliamentary debate: "The worst thing about the Constitution of India is that there is nothing Indian about it. Manusmriti is that scripture which is most worshippable after Vedas for our Hindu nation and from which our ancient times have become the basis for our culture, customs, thought, and practice." Stating that Manusmriti is the law today.
The crux of the matter comes to the surface when we compare the chief of the drafting committee of the Indian Constitution, Ambedkar, and one of the RSS Sarsanghchalaks, K. Sudarshan. Ambedkar burned the Manusmriti and drafted the Indian Constitution. The RSS Chief went on to label the Indian Constitution as being based on Western Values and the need to bring the Indian Constitution in line with Indian Holy books!
---
*Political commentator 

Comments

TRENDING

Aurangzeb’s last will recorded by his Maulvi: Allah shouldn't make anyone emperor

By Mohan Guruswamy  Aurangzeb’s grave is a simple slab open to the sky lying along the roadside at Khuldabad near Aurangabad. I once stopped by to marvel at the tomb of an Emperor of India whose empire was as large as Ashoka the Great's. It was only post 1857 when Victoria's domain exceeded this. The epitaph reads: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast." (The rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave) The modest tomb of Aurangzeb is perhaps the least recognised legacies of the Mughal Emperor who ruled the land for fifty eventful years. He was not a builder having expended his long tenure in war and conquest. Towards the end of his reign and life, he realised the futility of it all. He wrote: "Allah should not make anyone an emperor. The most unfortunate person is he who becomes one." Aurangzeb’s last will was re...

Beyond his riding skill, Karl Umrigar was admired for his radiance, sportsmanship, and affability

By Harsh Thakor*  Karl Umrigar's name remains etched in the annals of Indian horse racing, a testament to a talent tragically cut short. An accident on the racetrack at the tender age of nineteen robbed India of a rider on the cusp of greatness. Had he survived, there's little doubt he would have ascended to international stature, possibly becoming the greatest Indian jockey ever. Even 46 years after his death, his name shines brightly, reminiscent of an inextinguishable star. His cousin, Pesi Shroff, himself blossomed into one of the most celebrated jockeys in Indian horse racing.

PUCL files complaint with SC against Gujarat police, municipal authorities for 'unlawful' demolitions, custodial 'violence'

By A Representative   The People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has lodged a formal complaint with the Chief Justice of India, urging the Supreme Court to initiate suo-moto contempt proceedings against the police and municipal authorities in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The complaint alleges that these officials have engaged in unlawful demolitions and custodial violence, in direct violation of a Supreme Court order issued in November 2024.

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

State Human Rights Commission directs authorities to uphold environmental rights in Vadodara's Vishwamitri River Project

By A Representative  The Gujarat State Human Rights Commission (GSHRC) has ordered state and Vadodara municipal authorities to strictly comply with environmental and human rights safeguards during the Vishwamitri River Rejuvenation Project, stressing that the river’s degradation disproportionately affects marginalized communities and violates citizens’ rights to a healthy environment.  The Commission mandated an immediate halt to ecologically destructive practices, rehabilitation of affected communities, transparent adherence to National Green Tribunal (NGT) orders, and public consultations with experts and residents.   The order follows the Concerned Citizens of Vadodara coalition—environmentalists, ecologists, and urban planners—submitting a detailed letter to authorities, amplifying calls for accountability. The group warned that current plans to “re-section” and “desilt” the river contradict the NGT’s 2021 Vishwamitri River Action Plan, which prioritizes floodpla...

Haven't done a good deed, inner soul is cursing me as sinner: Aurangzeb's last 'will'

Counterview Desk The Tomb of Aurangzeb, the last of the strong Mughal emperors, located in Khuldabad, Aurangabad district, Maharashtra, has this epitaph inscribed on it: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e maa ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast" (the rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave).

CPM’s evaluation of BJP reflects its political character and its reluctance to take on battle against neo-fascism

By Harsh Thakor*  A controversial debate has emerged in the revolutionary camp regarding the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s categorization of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Many Communists criticize the CPM’s reluctance to label the BJP as a fascist party and India as a fascist state. Various factors must be considered to arrive at an accurate assessment. Understanding the original meaning and historical development of fascism is essential, as well as analyzing how it manifests in the present global and national context.

How polarization between different ideological trends within the communist movement sharpened in India

By Harsh Thakor*  This article is a rejoinder to A Note on Slogans of “Left Unity,” “Unity of the Communist Revolutionaries” and “Mass Line” by Umair Ahmed, published on the Nazariya blog .

Implications of deaths of Maoist leaders G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya in Chhattisgarh

By Harsh Thakor*  In the wake of recent security operations in southern Chhattisgarh, two senior Maoist leaders, G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya, were killed. These operations, which took place amidst a historically significant Maoist presence, resulted in the deaths of 31 individuals on March 20th and 16 more three days prior.

राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी: जल जीवन मिशन के लक्ष्य को पाने समन्वित प्रयास जरूरी

- राज कुमार सिन्हा*  जल संसाधन से जुड़ी स्थायी समिति ने वर्तमान लोकसभा सत्र में पेश रिपोर्ट में बताया है कि "नल से जल" मिशन में राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी साबित हुए हैं। जबकि देश के 11 राज्यों में शत-प्रतिशत ग्रामीणों को नल से जल आपूर्ति शुरू कर दी गई है। रिपोर्ट में समिति ने केंद्र सरकार को सिफारिश की है कि मिशन पुरा करने में राज्य सरकारों की समस्याओं पर गौर किया जाए।