Skip to main content

Defeat of martial law: Has the decisive moment for change come in South Korea?

By Steven Lee 

Late at night on December 3, soldiers stormed into South Korea’s National Assembly in armored vehicles and combat helicopters. Assembly staff desperately blocked their assault with fire extinguishers and barricades. South Korea’s President Yoon Suk Yeol had just declared martial law to “eliminate ‘anti-state’ forces.”
Outside the National Assembly, people gathered from all over Seoul and beyond. Within the hour, thousands were violating the martial law’s ban on all political activities and protests. People shivered in the cold as they stood off against the army and police, armed with nothing but songs and chants. They needed to defend the National Assembly until the vote to revoke martial law. Their chants grew louder: “Abolish martial law!” “Down with the dictatorship!”
Yoon conceded to the National Assembly vote and people’s resistance on the morning of December 4. His short-lived self-coup plunged South Korea into a furor. South Koreans managed to stop the rise of another dictatorship. Now, they need to organize into a force that can impeach him and carry out the structural changes required to ensure a complete democratic transformation in South Korea.
South Korea has a long history of using martial law to establish authoritarian rule. Yoon’s attempt was the 17th martial law in the 76 years since the founding of the Republic of Korea. The last time martial law was declared was 45 years ago, following Chun Doo-hwan’s coup that established Korea’s third dictatorship. The 1979 martial law was met with people’s resistance in the city of Gwangju, which the military regime massacred. South Korea also narrowly escaped martial law in 2017, when the Defense Security Command planned to seize control of Seoul with tanks and special forces for President Park Geun-hye, but she was impeached before the planned self-coup could be executed.
Impeachment is on the horizon again. Shocked and enraged by the attempted coup, about a million people rushed to the streets, demanding Yoon be ousted and arrested. However, there are two hurdles on the road to impeachment. First, two-thirds of the National Assembly must vote in favor of the motion. The combined strength of the opposition parties is just eight members short of two-thirds, which means there must be dissenting members from the ruling People Power Party for the impeachment motion to pass. On December 7, the motion failed to pass as all but three members of the ruling party boycotted the vote. However, the opposition parties intend to introduce the impeachment motion every week until it passes.
Second, once the National Assembly passes the motion, the decision of whether or not to impeach is up to the Constitutional Court. If at least six out of the nine justices are in favor of the decision, the president will be impeached. But, with only six justices on the bench, it is one short of its quorum of seven. However, Article 23, Paragraph 1 of the Constitutional Court Act, which specifies the quorum, was temporarily suspended in October. Thus, if the six justices are unanimous in their decision, Yoon could be impeached. Nonetheless, this possibility remains within legal gray areas.
What would happen after the impeachment? After the 2016 candlelight protests led to the impeachment of the corrupt Park Geun-hye regime, Moon Jae-in of the Democratic Party took power, promising to “Complete the Candlelight Revolution” by reforming the authoritarian government institutions, vestiges of dictatorship, and corrupt corporate conglomerates. Trusting his promise, mass mobilization efforts stopped. The power that overthrew the Park regime stepped down from the stage, hoping for top-down changes.
With more than 80 percent support ratings, the highest of any president, Moon was well-empowered to reform South Korean society toward greater equality and democracy. However, he did not take long to backtrack on many of his policies, and the promised social, economic, and constitutional reforms were never implemented. The Moon administration had started with boundless possibilities for social change, but in the end, it failed to fulfill its historic responsibility, instead contenting itself with maintaining the neoliberal status quo. The people’s disappointment and the subsequent political apathy led to the election of Yoon Suk Yeol, whose inept and authoritarian rule culminated in this martial law fiasco.
Now, history is about to repeat itself. At this moment, popular mobilization is necessary more than ever. The danger of a second martial law still looms. The people need to make a show of force so that the president does not attempt another coup. His power is already crumbling, with dissenting voices even within the military, but the threat will continue to haunt Korean democracy until he is entirely removed from office. Institutional hurdles and legal uncertainties are still present on the path to impeachment. The people need to apply constant pressure so that the impeachment motion pushes through the National Assembly and the Constitutional Court.
The 2016 candlelight uprising shows that a change in administration does not bring meaningful social change by itself, no matter how promising it may seem. It is necessary for the struggle to not stop at mobilization. At this point, the mobilization for impeachment is simply a defensive action to prevent further harm. The people need to seize the initiative and impose an alternative social order with their power to take one step further and change society for the better. To build this power, the people need to be organized into a concrete political force that can confidently propose a clear vision of a new society. Such a force would then need to hold the new administration accountable to the people’s demands and push toward the formation of that new society.
On December 4, 50 representatives of civil society organizations came together in an emergency meeting to debate the path forward. They agreed to create a coalition based on three goals: oust Yoon, hold the ruling party accountable, and achieve popular sovereignty and society-wide reforms. These goals are just a starting point. Now, the progressive forces in South Korea need to unite around the people’s struggle and listen to their demands closely. Analyses and debates then need to transform those demands into an actionable program of social change. It is the duty of the progressive forces now to present the people with the broadest unity and the sharpest vision to help them build and organize their power.
The situation continues to unfold in South Korea. Each passing moment shakes the foundation of the current social order and further opens the horizon of possibility. The people experienced a taste of their power in their defense to uphold democracy. It is now up to them to decide whether this movement will end here or will lead to the creation of a new, transformative power that will finally complete the democratization of South Korea. Now more than ever, the solidarity of the progressive forces all around the world is necessary to spur the Korean people onward to seize this moment and forge their own destiny.
---
Steven Lee is a member of both the translation and the action teams of the International Strategy Center. This article was produced by Globetrotter

Comments

TRENDING

70,000 migrants, sold on Canadian dream, face uncertain future: Canada reinvents the xenophobic wheel

By Saurav Sarkar*  Bikram Singh is running out of time on his post-study work visa in Canada. Singh is one of about 70,000 migrants who were sold on the Canadian dream of eventually making the country their home but now face an uncertain future with their work permits set to expire by December 2024. They came from places like India, China, and the Philippines, and sold their land and belongings in their home countries, took out loans, or made other enormous commitments to get themselves to Canada.

A groundbreaking non-violent approach: Maharishi’s invincible defense technology

By MajGen (R) Kulwant Singh, Col (R) SP Bakshi, Col (R) Jitendra Jung Karki, LtCol (R) Gunter Chassé & Dr David Leffler*  In today’s turbulent world, achieving lasting peace and ensuring national security are more urgent than ever. Traditional defense methods focus on advanced weapons, military strategies, and tactics, but a groundbreaking approach offers a new non-violent and holistic solution: Maharishi’s Invincible Defense Technology (IDT). 

EVMs: Govt must prove beyond reasonable doubt it's upholding mandate for free, fair polls

By Jerald D’souza  With the growth of India’s population, concerns about electoral fraud associated with ballot papers, also began to escalate. In 1989, the People’s Representation Act was amended to enable EVMs to prevent electoral fraud. In 1998, EVMs made their debut during legislative assembly elections and for the first time for general elections in 2004. However, criticisms against the EVMs and questions about their integrity have been raised by political parties, civil society and the general population. On 2 February 2024, there was a noteworthy demonstration of dissent where numerous individuals, including Ambedkarite advocates, legal professionals, and other members of civil society  convened at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar demanding the prohibition of EVMs. In 2024, the Supreme court had slapped down a petition to return to paper ballots on the basis that machines give “absolutely accurate results” unless human bias maligns them. The court stated that it was open to testi...

This Indian British Marxist blamed USSR's collapse in 1991 on Khrushchev's 'revisionism'

By Harsh Thakor*  Harpal Singh Brar, British Indian Marxist scholar and communist leader, has passed away in Chandigarh. He was 85. He was a lifelong supporter of socialism, Marxism, and the working class. He will be remembered among British Communists.

Chalapathi's death in encounter suggests Maoists' inability to establish broader mass support

By Harsh Thakor* The Maoist movement experienced a significant loss during the Ramagudem encounter on January 21, with the death of Chalapathi (Pratap), a Central Committee member of the CPI (Maoist). His death, along with 15 others, marks a major setback for the movement. Reports suggest that his location was revealed to security forces through a selfie with his wife.

Why do we mostly resist and refrain from communicating on sanitation topic?

By Nikhil Kumar, Mansee Bal Bhargava* According to UN SDG Progress report (2022), at the present moment no targets for SDG 6 are expected to be met by 2030. In 2022, 2.2 billion people had no access to safe drinking water and 3.5 million lacked safe sanitation. Approximately 50% of the world’s population was reported to have been under resourced in enough water for part of the year and a quarter of that population was living under “extremely high” water stress. Add to it, droughts have affected over 1.4 billion people between 2002 and 2021.

Govt of India asked to work for release of 217 Indian fishermen detained in Pakistan since 2021

By A Representative  Members of the fishing communities from Gujarat and Diu, Union Territory, held a press conference in Ahmedabad, urging the Union Government to take proactive measures to secure the release of Indian fishermen currently detained in Pakistan. Presently, 217 Indian fishermen, mostly from Gujarat and Diu, are held in Pakistan’s Malir Jail. Of these, 53 have been incarcerated since 2021 and 130 since 2022.

34 Dalit families in IIT Kanpur without toilets in Open Defecation Free India

By Sandeep Pandey   When Indian Institute of Technology at Kanpur was set up in 1959, two villages were uprooted. The farmers were given meagre compensation for the standing crop. No compensation was given for the land to build this institute of national importance. Each family was promised a job but what was not told to them was that one would require specialised skills to get a job at IIT. Some members of these families were, of course, absorbed for menial work. Some washerfolk families were also invited from outside to live on campus to take care of the laundry needs of students, staff and faculty members. One of these men was cajoled by IIT authorities then to forego a regular employment at IIT and instead take up clothes washing work.

अल्पसंख्यक कार्य मंत्रालय का बजट निराशाजनक: 19.3% अल्पसंख्यकों के लिए मात्र 0.0661% ठोस आवंटन

- मुजाहिद नफ़ीस*   1-2-2025 को भारत सरकार द्वारा संसद में वर्ष 2025-26 का बजट वित्त मंत्री निर्मला सीतारमण जी ने पेश किया| इस वर्ष का बजट 5065345 करोड़ है जो कि पिछले साल के संशोधित अनुमान से लगभग 7.39% की बढ़ोतरी हुई है| वहीं अल्पसंख्यक कार्य मंत्रालय का बजट मात्र 3350.00 करोड़ है जो कि कुल बजट का 0.0661% लगभग है|  पिछले साल 2024-25 में 3183.24 करोड़ था|