Supreme Court’s dismissal of PIL on Covid vaccine safety is counter to known science and mathematics

By Bhaskaran Raman*
On 14 Oct 2024, the Supreme Court of India dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on the side-effects of the Covid vaccine. In 2021, the world saw the rollout of various Covid vaccine candidates. In India, Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin and Serum Institute of India’s Covishield were rolled out. Covishield was nothing but Oxford’s AstraZeneca relabelled in India.

The importance of open-minded and scientific probe of Covid vaccine safety

In 2020/2021, all Covid vaccines were authorized for emergency use, which meant that the necessary efficacy and safety follow-up was incomplete at that time. The originally approved trials – called randomised controlled trials (RCT) had a “vaccine” group and a “placebo” group for comparison. Such experimental comparison/control is the cornerstone of the scientific method – which even children learn in photosynthesis experiments in class-1. The vaccine trials were scheduled to conclude in late 2022/early 2023. For instance, Covaxin’s trial was scheduled to end in Dec 2022, while Covishield’s trial was scheduled to end in Feb 2023.
In another court case, the government has argued that safety is not of concern now that “Covid is long gone. Vaccination is long over”. Nothing could be further from the truth. The long-term comparison of the two groups “vaccine” versus “placebo” is absolutely essential for answering with confidence, questions such as: “are the increased heart attacks among youth today due to the Covid vaccine or some other reason?” However, none of Covid vaccines (including Covaxin & Covishield) which were originally approved for emergency use, have completed trial results.
The issue of long-term safety is all the more important given that 100+ crore Indians, including tens of crores of children and youth have been administered the emergency use products, although nowhere in the world did children and youth face an emergency due to Covid itself – they were hardly affected by the virus.
Despite the monumental importance however, the Supreme Court gave this issue only a brief few moments before dismissing the PIL without even a hearing. Furthermore, the remarks made by the bench prior to the dismissal are counter to known science and mathematics.

Remarks counter to known science

The bench has remarked “Because of the vaccines, we were able to deal with the pandemic”. Now, the known science behind immunology, which is indeed the basis of vaccines, is that exposure to a virus (weakened in a vaccine or natural) builds robust immunity. As of July 2021, we knew that the majority of Indians had already been exposed to the virus naturally, while only 10% of Indians had been given the vaccines at that time. Therefore the claim of vaccines helping in dealing with the pandemic is counter to known science.
The claim also flies in the face of data from other countries which had wave-after-wave of Covid even after much higher coverage of Covid vaccines. Two stark examples are that of Singapore and Australia, which had no major Covid waves at all, until after 75% of their population had been vaccinated – see graph of data below. More worryingly, both Singapore and Australia have reported record levels of excess deaths in the years following mass Covid vaccination.

The renowned physicist and Nobel Prize winner Richard Feynman once said: “It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong.” The theory of the Indian Supreme Court that the Covid vaccines helped deal with the pandemic may be beautiful and emotionally satisfying, but it does not match with observed data, and hence it is scientifically flawed.

Remarks counter to known mathematics

During the brief proceedings, the bench also checked if the counsel of the petitioner had any Covid vaccine side-effect. When the counsel said that he had not had any side-effect (thankfully), the bench immediately dismissed the case. This reflects a flawed understanding of basic mathematical probability. If the counsel of the petitioner was not affected, it clearly does not mean that the risk of the vaccine side-effect was zero. As an analogy, if a particular smoker does not get lung cancer (thankfully), it does not mean that there is no risk of smoking.
In dismissing the case without even a hearing, the Supreme Court has overestimated the risk of Covid and underestimated the risk of the vaccine. What is the relative risk of death or serious health damage with versus without the vaccine? It is precisely to answer this question that the vaccine trials are conducted. Surely, the Supreme Court is not expected to know such risk-benefit analysis. However, it is expected to know enough to seek expert opinion and ask for the trial results.

The way forward

The dismissal of the PIL by the Supreme Court is thus on flawed grounds. To repeat, none of the Covid vaccines which were originally approved for emergency use, have completed trial results. The Supreme Court should therefore do the right thing and ask the relevant authorities such as the ICMR and the vaccine manufacturers for the completed trial results.
---
*Professor at IIT Bombay. Views are personal

Comments

Aurangzeb’s last will recorded by his Maulvi: Allah shouldn't make anyone emperor

By Mohan Guruswamy Aurangzeb’s grave is a simple slab open to the sky lying along the roadside at Khuldabad near Aurangabad. I once stopped by to marvel at the tomb of an Emperor of India whose empire was as large as Ashoka the Great's. It was only post 1857 when Victoria's domain exceeded this. The epitaph reads: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast." (The rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave) The modest tomb of Aurangzeb is perhaps the least recognised legacies of the Mughal Emperor who ruled the land for fifty eventful years. He was not a builder having expended his long tenure in war and conquest. Towards the end of his reign and life, he realised the futility of it all. He wrote: "Allah should not make anyone an emperor. The most unfortunate person is he who becomes one." Aurangzeb’s last will was re...

Beyond his riding skill, Karl Umrigar was admired for his radiance, sportsmanship, and affability

By Harsh Thakor* Karl Umrigar's name remains etched in the annals of Indian horse racing, a testament to a talent tragically cut short. An accident on the racetrack at the tender age of nineteen robbed India of a rider on the cusp of greatness. Had he survived, there's little doubt he would have ascended to international stature, possibly becoming the greatest Indian jockey ever. Even 46 years after his death, his name shines brightly, reminiscent of an inextinguishable star. His cousin, Pesi Shroff, himself blossomed into one of the most celebrated jockeys in Indian horse racing.

PUCL files complaint with SC against Gujarat police, municipal authorities for 'unlawful' demolitions, custodial 'violence'

By A Representative The People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has lodged a formal complaint with the Chief Justice of India, urging the Supreme Court to initiate suo-moto contempt proceedings against the police and municipal authorities in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The complaint alleges that these officials have engaged in unlawful demolitions and custodial violence, in direct violation of a Supreme Court order issued in November 2024.

Haven't done a good deed, inner soul is cursing me as sinner: Aurangzeb's last 'will'

Counterview Desk The Tomb of Aurangzeb, the last of the strong Mughal emperors, located in Khuldabad, Aurangabad district, Maharashtra, has this epitaph inscribed on it: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e maa ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast" (the rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave).

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das* India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

How polarization between different ideological trends within the communist movement sharpened in India

By Harsh Thakor* This article is a rejoinder to A Note on Slogans of “Left Unity,” “Unity of the Communist Revolutionaries” and “Mass Line” by Umair Ahmed, published on the Nazariya blog .

State Human Rights Commission directs authorities to uphold environmental rights in Vadodara's Vishwamitri River Project

By A Representative The Gujarat State Human Rights Commission (GSHRC) has ordered state and Vadodara municipal authorities to strictly comply with environmental and human rights safeguards during the Vishwamitri River Rejuvenation Project, stressing that the river’s degradation disproportionately affects marginalized communities and violates citizens’ rights to a healthy environment. The Commission mandated an immediate halt to ecologically destructive practices, rehabilitation of affected communities, transparent adherence to National Green Tribunal (NGT) orders, and public consultations with experts and residents. The order follows the Concerned Citizens of Vadodara coalition—environmentalists, ecologists, and urban planners—submitting a detailed letter to authorities, amplifying calls for accountability. The group warned that current plans to “re-section” and “desilt” the river contradict the NGT’s 2021 Vishwamitri River Action Plan, which prioritizes floodpla...

CPM’s evaluation of BJP reflects its political character and its reluctance to take on battle against neo-fascism

By Harsh Thakor* A controversial debate has emerged in the revolutionary camp regarding the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s categorization of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Many Communists criticize the CPM’s reluctance to label the BJP as a fascist party and India as a fascist state. Various factors must be considered to arrive at an accurate assessment. Understanding the original meaning and historical development of fascism is essential, as well as analyzing how it manifests in the present global and national context.

Vadodara citizens urge authorities to adhere to environmental mandates in Vishwamitri River Rejuvenation Project

By A Representative A coalition of environmental activists, ecologists, and urban planners in Vadodara has issued an urgent appeal to state and municipal authorities, demanding strict compliance with court-mandated guidelines for the upcoming Vishwamitri River rejuvenation project. Scheduled to commence in March 2025, the initiative aims to mitigate flooding and restore the river, but citizens warn that current plans risk violating National Green Tribunal (NGT) orders and jeopardizing the river’s fragile ecosystem, home to endangered species like crocodiles and Indian Softshell Turtles.

Buddhist communities in Michigan protest for Mahabodhi Temple’s return to Buddhist control

By A Representative Buddhist communities in Michigan have staged protests demanding the return of the Mahabodhi Vihara in Gaya, Bihar, India, to full Buddhist control. The Mahabodhi Temple, regarded as the holiest pilgrimage site in Buddhism, is currently managed under the Bodhgaya Temple Act of 1949, which grants a majority of control to non-Buddhists.

Search This Blog