Skip to main content

Move to give religious colour to merger of Hyderabad in India in Sept 1948

By Ram Puniyani* 

On September 17, 1948, the princely state of Hyderabad was integrated into India through what was referred to as a "Police Action," executed by the Indian Army. This operation, known as Operation Polo, was led by General Chaudhary. In recognition of this event, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) now celebrates it as Hyderabad Liberation Day, while the Congress-led government of Telangana marks it as Praja Palan Day (Advent of Democracy Day). 
BJP leader Kishan Reddy argues that failing to honor it as Hyderabad Liberation Day would disrespect the sacrifices made by those who lost their lives during the integration process. Conversely, some critics argue that the annexation of this Muslim-majority princely state reflects a form of Islamophobia on the part of Jawaharlal Nehru and Sardar Patel. 
Many discussions surrounding this topic tend to be one-sided or biased. Can a princely state ruled by a Muslim monarch truly be classified as a "Muslim state," given that a majority of its population was Hindu? Similarly, can a Muslim-majority region governed by a Hindu king, like Kashmir, be designated a "Hindu state"? 
While certain scholars interpret these events through the lens of religion, the key issues at play were geographical dynamics and the transition from a feudal system to a democratic government. The situation in Kashmir is particularly complicated, influenced by Pakistan’s ambitions to establish a Muslim state, which viewed a Muslim-majority Kashmir as destined to join Pakistan, following Jinnah’s Two-Nation Theory—originally articulated by Savarkar. 
Why did Nehru take an interest in Kashmir's accession to India? Was it solely about geographical expansion, or did it also support the democratic movement against feudalism? Sheikh Abdullah, with aspirations for democracy, transformed the Muslim Conference into the National Conference and advocated for secular values, looking up to Gandhi and Nehru as models. The issue was complicated further by Pakistan's aggression, known as the Tribal invasion, which had military backing. Moreover, there was the question of sovereignty. 
Many monarchs referred to their kingdoms through the lens of their religion, while Indian nationalists argued that sovereignty resided with the people, not the rulers. This context is crucial to understanding the complex merger of Hyderabad into India. 
Upon India’s independence, the princely states—numbering over 600—were given the choice to join either Pakistan or India or to remain independent. Many princely states, enjoying autonomy during British rule, faced a dilemma, with most preferring independence. Lord Mountbatten advised them to align with neighboring countries.
Sardar Patel, overseeing many mergers, promised princes a degree of autonomy in most matters except for defense, communication, and foreign affairs, in return for retaining their substantial wealth and properties. 
Most princely states eventually agreed to merge with India, including Travancore, ruled by a Hindu king, while the Raja of Kashmir, Hari Singh, and the Nizam of Hyderabad initially refused to join. 
As mentioned earlier, Indian leaders believed that sovereignty should rest with the people rather than monarchs. Many of these kings were loyal to the British and enjoyed a lavish lifestyle. The integration of Junagadh into India was conducted via military action, followed by a plebiscite that confirmed its merger with India. 
Nizam of Hyderabad sought to remain independent or merge with Pakistan—not for religious reasons,
The Nizam of Hyderabad, controlling a rich and expansive state, sought to remain independent or merge with Pakistan—not for religious reasons, but because Jinnah assured him that his rights would be safeguarded. India's interest in merging Hyderabad stemmed from various practical concerns, with Islamophobia not being one of them. 
Geographically, Hyderabad’s location within India posed significant logistical challenges as an independent or Pakistani state, likely leading to ongoing issues. This geographical consideration was central to Nehru and Patel's strategy. 
A standstill agreement was signed with the Nizam in November 1947, during which there was hope to democratize Hyderabad’s administration to facilitate negotiations. However, the Nizam used this period to bolster his military force, the Razakars, led by Major General SA El Edroos. In the meantime, the Congress initiated a Satyagraha demanding the democratization of state administration, resulting in the imprisonment of approximately 20,000 participants. 
The oppressive actions of the Nizam's forces and Razakar atrocities against Hindus led many to flee. Concurrently, the communists formed dalams (militant groups) to redistribute land and defend people against Razakar violence. As negotiations prolonged, the Razakars became increasingly threatening. 
The anti-Nizam movement garnered support from various local groups and a portion of the national Muslim community. Patel expressed satisfaction in a letter to Suhravardy, noting that Indian Union Muslims had openly aligned with the Indian side regarding Hyderabad, positively impacting public sentiment. 
Against this backdrop, military action was initiated, which, according to the Sunderlal Report, resulted in approximately 40,000 deaths, primarily among Muslims. 
The interpretation of history hinges on the narratives we choose to embrace. While some scholars emphasize religious factors and accuse Indian leaders of Islamophobia, it is vital to consider both geographical realities and the push for democratization and anti-feudal resistance by local communists. 
Criticisms directed at Nehru and Patel's leadership tend to be biased, overshadowing their aspirations, which, while not fully realized, aimed at a more democratic society. 
---
*Political commentator 

Comments

TRENDING

Adani coalmine delayed? Australian senate fails to pass crucial "reform" amendment for project's financial closure

Adanis' Mundra power plant, controversial in Australia By  A  Representative In what is being described as a new “new hurdle”, the proposed Adani coalmine in the Queensland state of in Australia failed to get the crucial Australian Parliamentary nod, essential for financial closure for one of the biggest coalmining projects in the world. The government lost the Senate vote 35-33, meaning the legislation won't pass until the Senate returns in mid-June.

Paul Newman wasn't just remarkably talented, he was anti-war activist, disdained Hollywood excesses

By Harsh Thakor*  On January 26th of this year, we celebrated the birth centenary of Paul Newman, one of the finest actors of his era. His passing on September 26, 2008, after a prolonged battle with lung cancer, was met with an outpouring of tributes and remembrances from artists across the film industry, all sharing their thoughts and memories of the legendary actor.  

Aurangzeb’s last will recorded by his Maulvi: Allah shouldn't make anyone emperor

By Mohan Guruswamy  Aurangzeb’s grave is a simple slab open to the sky lying along the roadside at Khuldabad near Aurangabad. I once stopped by to marvel at the tomb of an Emperor of India whose empire was as large as Ashoka the Great's. It was only post 1857 when Victoria's domain exceeded this. The epitaph reads: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast." (The rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave) The modest tomb of Aurangzeb is perhaps the least recognised legacies of the Mughal Emperor who ruled the land for fifty eventful years. He was not a builder having expended his long tenure in war and conquest. Towards the end of his reign and life, he realised the futility of it all. He wrote: "Allah should not make anyone an emperor. The most unfortunate person is he who becomes one." Aurangzeb’s last will was re...

Beyond his riding skill, Karl Umrigar was admired for his radiance, sportsmanship, and affability

By Harsh Thakor*  Karl Umrigar's name remains etched in the annals of Indian horse racing, a testament to a talent tragically cut short. An accident on the racetrack at the tender age of nineteen robbed India of a rider on the cusp of greatness. Had he survived, there's little doubt he would have ascended to international stature, possibly becoming the greatest Indian jockey ever. Even 46 years after his death, his name shines brightly, reminiscent of an inextinguishable star. His cousin, Pesi Shroff, himself blossomed into one of the most celebrated jockeys in Indian horse racing.

Health expert Dr Amitav Banerjee on commercialization of healthcare and neglect of natural immunity

By AK Shiburaj  In an interview with me, eminent health expert Dr. Amitav Banerjee has examined the impact of privatization on the healthcare sector, the implications of the World Health Organization (WHO) becoming a commercially driven entity, and the consequences of a pharmaceutical industry prioritizing profit over public health. He argues that an approach ignoring the importance of natural immunity fosters a drug-centric system that undermines the benefits of modern medicine.

Haven't done a good deed, inner soul is cursing me as sinner: Aurangzeb's last 'will'

Counterview Desk The Tomb of Aurangzeb, the last of the strong Mughal emperors, located in Khuldabad, Aurangabad district, Maharashtra, has this epitaph inscribed on it: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e maa ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast" (the rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave).

Hyderabad seminar rekindles memories of the spark lit 50 years ago by students

By Harsh Thakor*  History is something we constantly remember and reflect upon, but certain moments and events bring it back to our memory in a special way. For the Telugu people, and Telangana in particular, the memorial seminar held on February 20–21 was a significant occasion to recall the glorious events, transformations, leaders, and heroes of past struggles. Thousands of students rewrote the history of people's movements in Andhra Pradesh, carrying revolutionary zeal and the spirit of self-sacrifice to levels comparable to the Russian and Chinese Revolutions.

Trust, we (from People to PM and President) did not take a Holy Dip in some Holy Shit!

By Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava  I could see two deeply interlinked aspects between human and water in #MahaKumbh2025. Firstly, the HOPE that a ‘holy dip’ in the River Ganga (colloquially referred as dubki and spiritually as ‘Snan’) will cleanse oneself (especially the sins); and secondly, the TRUST that the water is pure to perform the cleansing alias living the hope. Well, I consider hope to be self-dependent while, trust is a multi-party dependent situation. The focus here is on the trust and I shall write later on hope.

Vadodara citizens urge authorities to adhere to environmental mandates in Vishwamitri River Rejuvenation Project

By A Representative   A coalition of environmental activists, ecologists, and urban planners in Vadodara has issued an urgent appeal to state and municipal authorities, demanding strict compliance with court-mandated guidelines for the upcoming Vishwamitri River rejuvenation project. Scheduled to commence in March 2025, the initiative aims to mitigate flooding and restore the river, but citizens warn that current plans risk violating National Green Tribunal (NGT) orders and jeopardizing the river’s fragile ecosystem, home to endangered species like crocodiles and Indian Softshell Turtles.  

Buddhist communities in Michigan protest for Mahabodhi Temple’s return to Buddhist control

By A Representative   Buddhist communities in Michigan have staged protests demanding the return of the Mahabodhi Vihara in Gaya, Bihar, India, to full Buddhist control. The Mahabodhi Temple, regarded as the holiest pilgrimage site in Buddhism, is currently managed under the Bodhgaya Temple Act of 1949, which grants a majority of control to non-Buddhists.