Skip to main content

'Militarisation of mind': Democratic dissent being criminalised in the name of national unity

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  

The working masses are now seeking alternative political, cultural, social, and economic systems that work for all, irrespective of any form of discrimination on the grounds of gender, class, race, sexuality, religion, or caste. People understand and recognize that capitalism is not working for them. 
Therefore, alternative politics is essential for the social, economic, and cultural transformations needed to achieve a progressive, prosperous, and peaceful future. The working masses have grown increasingly weary of the capitalist culture, characterised by exploitation, violence, and the deceptive strategies of the ruling classes. 
The working masses understand that radical change cannot come from traditional systems that have long upheld inequality and injustice of various kinds, but from new ideas and movements that challenge the status quo and prioritise the well-being of all.
Therefore, the world is currently witnessing various forms of mass resistance against reactionary and authoritarian ruling classes. Movements such as Black Lives Matter, climate action initiatives, farmers' protests, and anti-war, anti-capitalist, and anti-Zionist campaigns are emerging as significant forms of political struggle. 
These movements aim to drive social and environmental change toward a sustainable future for both people and the planet. However, the ruling classes have unleashed their onslaught on the working masses in the name of protecting national sovereignty, cultural unity, and religious, racial, and caste purity. Such a strategy by the ruling class serves four specific objectives that uphold the interests of capitalism. 
Firstly, it ties working people to their immediate constructed identities and superficial interests in the name of nationalism, culture, religion, tradition, and family honour. 
Secondly, it dismantles unity among working people, preventing any form of radical democratic transformation. 
Thirdly, it destroys progressive consciousness based on shared experiences and solidarity. 
Finally, it creates the foundation for security states and authoritarian corporate governments, which are designed to police protests and criminalise dissent to uphold the interests of both the ruling and non-ruling elites. 
By criminalising dissent, progressive protests, and radical alternatives, the elites are institutionalising crime and criminal culture. For example, the criminalisation of anti-Zionist protests is a way of justifying the Jewish Holocaust, racism, and genocide. In this way, the criminalisation of democratic dissent undermines democracy and its potential for progressive transformation.
The structural discriminatory practices, repressive and illiberal cultures of capitalism are incompatible with the requirements of a modern, democratic and progressive society based on solidarity.
Thus, disenchantment with capitalism and its political, social, and cultural forms is growing across the world. In order to control the growth of alternative politics, capitalism is instigating so-called nationalistic wars, regional conflicts and forming alliances with reactionary, religious, and authoritarian forces to normalise its existence and undermine democracy and citizenship rights. 
By criminalising dissent, progressive protests, and radical alternatives, the elites are institutionalising crime and criminal culture
It promotes and imposes a culture of crisis, where a 'dog-eat-dog' principle creates insecurities in lives and liberties, making the primacy of security states and authoritarian governments, led by capitalism, seem like the only viable and natural alternative.
Militarisation of mind is another safety net of capitalism. Through the militarisation of minds via wars, religious, cultural, and social conflicts, capitalism aims to domesticate individuals and societies within its own narratives by undermining their immediate material needs. 
This militarisation not only stimulates an epidemic of mental health crises but also erodes individuals' ability to think critically and rationally. It undermines both collective and individual consciousness, obstructing the creation of a progressive and scientific society free from injustice and exploitation. 
Militarisation of the mind is a war by other means, where many people effectively sign their own death warrant and reason meets its natural end, creating fertile ground for mass domestication under the criminal system of capitalism. 
Crime, criminalisation, courts, and legal infrastructures are inseparable from capitalism as a system. Criminalisation is a tool of capitalist governance, where condemning people to life in prison is presented as an alternative to justice. 
The individual's crime is replaced by systemic crime, where reform is not possible, and justice is denied. It breeds the arbitrariness of power by the state, government and courts. 
Delegitimising democratic dissent in the name of national unity, depoliticising the state and government in the name of economic growth, and creating legal regimes to protect property and political conditions to facilitate capital accumulation are the pillars of technologically driven contemporary capitalism. Any alternative discourse to capitalism is deemed a crime; thus, criminalisation is a well-organised outcome of capitalism.
Crime and criminalisation breed crime and criminal enterprises within capitalism. There is no justice within these cycles and circles of crime. In such a situation, reform within capitalism is merely a way of maintaining the status quo. It is unlikely to serve the working masses. 
The world needs an uninterrupted mass struggle to end capitalism and to establish and sustain any form of alternatives that serve the people and the planet. Working toward the demise of capitalism is the first step in the search for alternatives.
---
*Academic based in UK

Comments

TRENDING

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी: जल जीवन मिशन के लक्ष्य को पाने समन्वित प्रयास जरूरी

- राज कुमार सिन्हा*  जल संसाधन से जुड़ी स्थायी समिति ने वर्तमान लोकसभा सत्र में पेश रिपोर्ट में बताया है कि "नल से जल" मिशन में राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी साबित हुए हैं। जबकि देश के 11 राज्यों में शत-प्रतिशत ग्रामीणों को नल से जल आपूर्ति शुरू कर दी गई है। रिपोर्ट में समिति ने केंद्र सरकार को सिफारिश की है कि मिशन पुरा करने में राज्य सरकारों की समस्याओं पर गौर किया जाए। 

Censor Board's bullying delays 'Phule': A blow to India's democratic spirit

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  A film based on the life and legacy of Jyotiba Phule and Savitribai Phule was expected to release today. Instead, its release has been pushed to the last week of April. The reason? Protests by self-proclaimed guardians of caste pride—certain Brahmin groups—and forced edits demanded by a thoroughly discredited Censor Board.

CASR urges immediate halt to Operation Kagaar, calls for peace talks with Maoists

By A Representative   The Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), a collective of over 40 civil society organizations, has issued a press statement demanding an immediate end to "Operation Kagaar" and alleged state-led killings of Maoist rebels and indigenous people in central India. The group also called on the central government to create a conducive environment for initiating peace talks with the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist).

Maoist call for peace talks: A democratic opening amidst state repression?

By Harsh Thakor*  The readiness of the CPI (Maoist), a banned organisation, for peace talks is seen as signifying a democratic gesture that should be welcomed by all who uphold democratic values. The ongoing conflict under ‘Operation Kagaar’ in Central India represents a clash between alleged state aggression and self-defence by oppressed communities. Critics argue that the Indian government has violated constitutional principles by promoting corporate expansion in Adivasi regions under the pretext of development, endangering the lives and livelihoods of local populations.

Incarcerated for 2,424 days, Sudhir Dhawale combines Ambedkarism with Marxism

By Harsh Thakor   One of those who faced incarceration both under Congress and BJP rule, Sudhir Dhawale was arrested on June 6, 2018, one of the first six among the 16 people held in what became known as the Elgar Parishad case. After spending 2,424 days in incarceration, he became the ninth to be released from jail—alongside Rona Wilson, who walked free with him on January 24. The Bombay High Court granted them bail, citing the prolonged imprisonment without trial as a key factor. I will always remember the moments we spent together in Mumbai between 1998 and 2006, during public meetings and protests across a wide range of issues. Sudhir was unwavering in his commitment to Maoism, upholding the torch of B.R. Ambedkar, and resisting Brahmanical fascism. He sought to bridge the philosophies of Marxism and Ambedkarism. With boundless energy, he waved the banner of liberation, becoming the backbone of the revolutionary democratic centre in Mumbai and Maharashtra. He dedicated himself ...

Why crucifixion is a comprehensive message of political journey for the liberation of the oppressed

By Vijayan MJ  Passion week is that time of the year when Christians all over the world remind themselves about the sufferings, anguish, pain and the bloody crucifixion that Jesus Christ took on himself, as part of his mission of emancipating the people and establishing the kingdom of god. The crucifixion was not just a great symbolism of the personal sacrifice of one person, but it was a comprehensive messaging of a political journey for the liberation of the oppressed; one filled with struggle, militancy, celebration of life, rejection of temptations, betrayals, grief, the long-walk with the cross, crucifixion and ultimately resurrection as a symbol of victory over the oppressors and evil. 

How Mumbai University crumbles: Not just its buildings

By Rosamma Thomas*  In recent days, the news from the University of Mumbai has been far from inspiring – clumps of plaster have fallen off the ceiling at the CD Deshmukh Bhavan, and it was good fortune that no one was injured; creepy crawlies were found in the water dispenser that students use to collect drinking water, and timely warning videos circulated by vigilant students have kept people safe so far.

CPM’s evaluation of BJP reflects its political character and its reluctance to take on battle against neo-fascism

By Harsh Thakor*  A controversial debate has emerged in the revolutionary camp regarding the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s categorization of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Many Communists criticize the CPM’s reluctance to label the BJP as a fascist party and India as a fascist state. Various factors must be considered to arrive at an accurate assessment. Understanding the original meaning and historical development of fascism is essential, as well as analyzing how it manifests in the present global and national context.

Akhilesh Yadav’s boycott of Dainik Jagran: A step towards accountability or political rhetoric?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat  Akhilesh Yadav has called for a total boycott of Dainik Jagran, a newspaper owned by the Gupta family. He also declared that the Samajwadi Party will no longer participate in any panel discussions organized by a media channel allegedly controlled by the family or relatives of the omnipresent Rajiv Shukla. Akhilesh Yadav and the Samajwadi Party are well aware that Dainik Jagran has long been antagonistic to Dalit-Bahujan interests. The newspaper represents a Bania-Brahmin corporate and ideological enterprise.