Skip to main content

Commitment to Constitutional morality under shadow? Modi-Chandrachud 'bonhomie'

Counterview Desk 
India's top human rights organization, People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), has said that neither the BJP and Narendra Modi, seeking to defend what it calls the "bonhomie between the Prime Minister and the Chief Justice of India" refuse to understand that the their participation at the Ganapati Pooja "violates canons of law, ethics and constitutional morality."
Stating that the controversy is refusing to die down, PUCL said, "The fact that the Chief Justice not only did not demonstrate aloofness, but instead demonstrated an  unconstitutional bonhomie, sends the message right down the judicial hierarchy that is indeed acceptable to fraternize with the executive. It is a tragedy that the message that these values adopted by no less than the full court, can be bypassed, should have been sent by no less than the Chief Justice of India."

Text: 

The visit of Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the house of Chief Justice Dhananjaya Chandrachud on 12th September, 2024 to participate in Ganesh Aarti has triggered a constitutional controversy due to its cavalier disregard for foundational constitutional principles.  The controversy refuses to die down with  both the BJP and the Prime Minister doubling down in defence of the same.  The BJP spokesman has argued in a rhetorical fashion as to ‘why should not the different pillars of democracy be friends?  Should they be enemies?’ The Prime Minister has sought to politicize the response by stating that the Congress ecosystem was angry because he participated in a Ganapati Pooja.
Both defenses refuse to understand that the ‘controversy’, which this visit has invoked is  not about ‘different pillars of democracy being friends’ but about an unconstitutional bonhomie. It is not about an invidious attack on the participation in a Ganapati pooja, but about the propriety and indeed the constitutional morality which the visit violates. It is fundamentally about  questions of law, ethics and constitutional morality.  
There are two fundamental principles of the Constitution which are relevant to understand the issues which arise from the visit. First, is the principle of separation of powers and second is the principle of independence of judiciary. Both have been held by the Supreme Court itself as fundamental to the governance of the country.
The Supreme Court has extensive judicial review powers which entitles it not merely to strike down administrative actions but also legislations and even Constitutional Amendments. Union of India is one of the major  litigants before the Supreme Court. On a daily basis before multiple Benches of the Supreme Court including the Bench presided over by the Chief Justice, the  Union of India is a litigant. Mr. Modi, in his capacity as a Prime Minister is the Chief Executive of the Union of India. Besides, in his capacity as the Head of the ruling Parliamentary coalition, he  is also virtually the head of the legislative wing. 
It is therefore vital that the constitutional Laxman Rekha which governs the relationships between the two wings must not be crossed and must not even be perceived to be crossed by two individuals who in their person represent  the executive and the judiciary.
One can have no objection to religious beliefs which either the Chief Justice or the Prime Minister hold. Similarly one cannot object to Justice Chandrachud or Prime Minister  performing Ganesh Aarti at their home or elsewhere.  They are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and religion as any ordinary citizen. One can also not have any objection to their meeting in public functions where they are meeting in their official capacities. 
One may also not have serious objection to their meeting at a private function where large number of other members of public are present- such as a wedding or an Iftaar party. However a personal invitation to the Head of the executive by the Chief Justice for a private exclusive religious ceremony at home undoubtedly raises  doubts about whether the conduct is within the four corners of the constitution. 
This would be the case irrespective of whether cameraman was present or not and whether this was widely circulated in the social media or not. Of course, the constitutional error is compounded by this private meeting being  videographed and circulated as if to communicate that there is nothing wrong in personal relations between politicians and judges, even when the same judges are adjudicating virtually on a daily basis on the decisions of the executive. It bears noting that the government is the largest litigant in the Supreme  Court. 
It is of course possible for a judge to have personal relations with either a private or a public figure. But then they follow the extremely important convention  of recusing from cases in which they know a party. Recusal is not because of actual bias but to avoid even the very perception of bias. 
The message which has gone out is  of an unconstitutional bonhomie between the  judiciary and the executive at the highest levels. This severely compromises the perceived  ability of the judiciary to ask difficult questions to the executive and ensure that it does not transgress the limits imposed by the Constitution. In fact, the unconstitutional bonhomie sends a signal right down the judicial hierarchy that it is perhaps better not to take too seriously the principle  that ‘A judge should practice degree of aloofness consistent with the dignity of his office’. This principle was articulated as a ‘Restatement of Values of Judicial Life’  which was  adopted by the full Court meeting of the Supreme Court way back on 7th May, 1997. The fact that the Chief Justice not only did not demonstrate aloofness, but instead demonstrated an  unconstitutional bonhomie, sends the message right down the judicial hierarchy that is indeed acceptable to fraternize with the executive. It is a tragedy that the message that these values adopted by no less than the full court, can be bypassed, should have been sent by no less than the Chief Justice of India. 
The other values which a judge is enjoined to follow as per the  “Restatement of Values of Judicial Life’ include:
Paragraph 16: “Every Judge must at all times be conscious that he is under the public gaze and there should be no act or omission by him which is unbecoming of the high office he occupies and the public esteem in which that office is held.”
Similarly,  the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct, 2002 which have been ratified by the Economic and Social Council  states the following: 
“1.3  A judge shall not only be free from inappropriate connections with, and influence by, the executive and legislative branches of government, but must also appear to a reasonable observer to be free therefrom. 
2.2.  A judge shall ensure that his or her conduct, both in and out of court, maintains and enhances the confidence of the public, the legal profession and litigants in the impartiality of the judge and of the judiciary.
3.2 The behaviour and conduct of a judge must reaffirm the people’s faith in the integrity of the judiciary. Justice must not only be done but must also be seen to be done. 
4.2 As a subject of constant public scrutiny, a judge must accept personal restrictions that might be viewed as burdensome by the ordinary citizen and should do so freely and willingly. 
4.6 A judge, like any other citizen, is entitled to freedom of expression, belief, association and assembly, but in exercising such rights, a judge shall always conduct himself or herself in such a manner as to preserve the dignity of the judicial office and the impartiality and independence of the judiciary.”
Both constitutional morality and ethics dictate that Judges should follow these values in full. 
It is unfortunate that  the Prime Minister’s personal visit to the Chief Justice’s house breaches the above principles. Undoubtedly in the past such episodes have happened like Bombay High Court Chief Justice M.C. Chagla’s letter to Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru in 1953 and Justice Bhagwati’s infamous letter to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in 1980. But these have been criticized in the past and they do not in any way justify the recent publicized visit of the Prime Minister to the Chief Justice’s house  causing a breach  in the  principles of separation of power and independence of judiciary which are primary constituents of rule of law and democracy.
By breaching the above principles, what has come under a shadow is the commitment to Constitutional morality by those at the very apex of the Indian state.  As Babasaheb Ambedkar reminded us, ‘Constitutional morality is not a natural sentiment, it has to be cultivated’.  It is expected that those in high constitutional office will nurture this delicate plant called constitutional morality and not pull it up by its roots.
We seriously urge the Chief Justice to make constitutional recompense and  repair the  shaken faith of the common person in democracy, rule of law and the separation of powers by ensuring that henceforth  there is a scrupulously adherence  to the Bangalore principles and the ‘Restatement of Values of Judicial Life’. 
-- Kavita Srivastava, President; V Suresh, PUCL

Comments

TRENDING

Adani coalmine delayed? Australian senate fails to pass crucial "reform" amendment for project's financial closure

Adanis' Mundra power plant, controversial in Australia By  A  Representative In what is being described as a new “new hurdle”, the proposed Adani coalmine in the Queensland state of in Australia failed to get the crucial Australian Parliamentary nod, essential for financial closure for one of the biggest coalmining projects in the world. The government lost the Senate vote 35-33, meaning the legislation won't pass until the Senate returns in mid-June.

Paul Newman wasn't just remarkably talented, he was anti-war activist, disdained Hollywood excesses

By Harsh Thakor*  On January 26th of this year, we celebrated the birth centenary of Paul Newman, one of the finest actors of his era. His passing on September 26, 2008, after a prolonged battle with lung cancer, was met with an outpouring of tributes and remembrances from artists across the film industry, all sharing their thoughts and memories of the legendary actor.  

Aurangzeb’s last will recorded by his Maulvi: Allah shouldn't make anyone emperor

By Mohan Guruswamy  Aurangzeb’s grave is a simple slab open to the sky lying along the roadside at Khuldabad near Aurangabad. I once stopped by to marvel at the tomb of an Emperor of India whose empire was as large as Ashoka the Great's. It was only post 1857 when Victoria's domain exceeded this. The epitaph reads: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast." (The rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave) The modest tomb of Aurangzeb is perhaps the least recognised legacies of the Mughal Emperor who ruled the land for fifty eventful years. He was not a builder having expended his long tenure in war and conquest. Towards the end of his reign and life, he realised the futility of it all. He wrote: "Allah should not make anyone an emperor. The most unfortunate person is he who becomes one." Aurangzeb’s last will was re...

Health expert Dr Amitav Banerjee on commercialization of healthcare and neglect of natural immunity

By AK Shiburaj  In an interview with me, eminent health expert Dr. Amitav Banerjee has examined the impact of privatization on the healthcare sector, the implications of the World Health Organization (WHO) becoming a commercially driven entity, and the consequences of a pharmaceutical industry prioritizing profit over public health. He argues that an approach ignoring the importance of natural immunity fosters a drug-centric system that undermines the benefits of modern medicine.

Beyond his riding skill, Karl Umrigar was admired for his radiance, sportsmanship, and affability

By Harsh Thakor*  Karl Umrigar's name remains etched in the annals of Indian horse racing, a testament to a talent tragically cut short. An accident on the racetrack at the tender age of nineteen robbed India of a rider on the cusp of greatness. Had he survived, there's little doubt he would have ascended to international stature, possibly becoming the greatest Indian jockey ever. Even 46 years after his death, his name shines brightly, reminiscent of an inextinguishable star. His cousin, Pesi Shroff, himself blossomed into one of the most celebrated jockeys in Indian horse racing.

Haven't done a good deed, inner soul is cursing me as sinner: Aurangzeb's last 'will'

Counterview Desk The Tomb of Aurangzeb, the last of the strong Mughal emperors, located in Khuldabad, Aurangabad district, Maharashtra, has this epitaph inscribed on it: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e maa ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast" (the rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave).

Hyderabad seminar rekindles memories of the spark lit 50 years ago by students

By Harsh Thakor*  History is something we constantly remember and reflect upon, but certain moments and events bring it back to our memory in a special way. For the Telugu people, and Telangana in particular, the memorial seminar held on February 20–21 was a significant occasion to recall the glorious events, transformations, leaders, and heroes of past struggles. Thousands of students rewrote the history of people's movements in Andhra Pradesh, carrying revolutionary zeal and the spirit of self-sacrifice to levels comparable to the Russian and Chinese Revolutions.

Trust, we (from People to PM and President) did not take a Holy Dip in some Holy Shit!

By Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava  I could see two deeply interlinked aspects between human and water in #MahaKumbh2025. Firstly, the HOPE that a ‘holy dip’ in the River Ganga (colloquially referred as dubki and spiritually as ‘Snan’) will cleanse oneself (especially the sins); and secondly, the TRUST that the water is pure to perform the cleansing alias living the hope. Well, I consider hope to be self-dependent while, trust is a multi-party dependent situation. The focus here is on the trust and I shall write later on hope.

Vadodara citizens urge authorities to adhere to environmental mandates in Vishwamitri River Rejuvenation Project

By A Representative   A coalition of environmental activists, ecologists, and urban planners in Vadodara has issued an urgent appeal to state and municipal authorities, demanding strict compliance with court-mandated guidelines for the upcoming Vishwamitri River rejuvenation project. Scheduled to commence in March 2025, the initiative aims to mitigate flooding and restore the river, but citizens warn that current plans risk violating National Green Tribunal (NGT) orders and jeopardizing the river’s fragile ecosystem, home to endangered species like crocodiles and Indian Softshell Turtles.  

Buddhist communities in Michigan protest for Mahabodhi Temple’s return to Buddhist control

By A Representative   Buddhist communities in Michigan have staged protests demanding the return of the Mahabodhi Vihara in Gaya, Bihar, India, to full Buddhist control. The Mahabodhi Temple, regarded as the holiest pilgrimage site in Buddhism, is currently managed under the Bodhgaya Temple Act of 1949, which grants a majority of control to non-Buddhists.