Skip to main content

Elite 'promote, practice' hereditary politics to undermine democratic struggle

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak* 

Democracy is not only a product of the struggles of the working classes, but its survival against all odds also depends on the unwavering commitment of the working people. Historically, the working class has played a pivotal role in the establishment, promotion and preservation of democratic processes and institutions. 
Their collective actions, from organising labour movements to participating in political processes, have been fundamental in shaping democratic societies, states, and governments. The ongoing resilience and active participation of the working class are crucial for maintaining and enhancing democratic cultures and values.
In times of political turmoil and economic challenges, it is often the working people who stand at the forefront, advocating for rights, justice, and equality. Their dedication ensures that democracy remains a dynamic and inclusive system, capable of addressing the needs and aspirations of all its citizens irrespective of their backgrounds. 
Therefore, acknowledging and supporting the contributions of the working class is essential for the continued health and growth of democratic governance.
However, the propertied classes, industrialists, and business owners, ruling and non-ruling elites continue to employ various strategies to undermine the working-class origins of democracy by promoting and practicing hereditary politics, as if political power is a property that must be inherited and controlled by a family. 
This approach not only contradicts the fundamental principles of democracy but also reinforces a system of entrenched privilege and inequality. By perpetuating the notion that political authority should remain within certain families, these elites aim to consolidate their power and maintain the status quo. 
This practice often results in a concentration of power that excludes the broader population, particularly women, working class, poor, marginalised communities, castes, people of colour from meaningful participation in the political processes.
Hereditary politics undermines the democratic ideal of equal opportunity and representation, fostering an environment where political positions are passed down through generations without regard to experience in public life, merit, or public service. The rich and powerful do not consider elections as tools for deepening democracy in the society. 
They often use elections as a means to capture state power, control government, and pursue their own interests. By leveraging their substantial resources, they influence electoral outcomes through extensive campaign financing, media control, and lobbying efforts. 
This enables them to shape policies and legislation in ways that favour their economic and political agendas. This manipulation of the democratic process undermines the principle of fair representation, as it skews the political landscape in favour of those with wealth and influence. 
Ordinary citizens find their voices drowned out by the sheer volume of money and power wielded by elite groups. As a result, policies that should serve the broader public interest are frequently designed to benefit a privileged few.
Such a strategy erodes public trust in democratic institutions and processes. When political power is perceived as a family heirloom rather than a public mandate, citizens become disillusioned with the democratic system and its ability to address their needs and concerns. 
This disillusionment leads to apathy, reduced civic engagement, and even social and political unrests. The influence of the rich and powerful extends beyond elections. 
They often maintain their grip on power by funding think tanks, political action committees, and other organisations that promote their interests. This creates a cycle where the same elite groups continue to dominate the political arena, perpetuating inequality and limiting social, political, and economic mobility.
Hereditary politics and inheritance of state power is fundamentally opposed to the democratic transformation of society, which seeks to ensure individual liberty, social and economic equality, and political justice. 
This system of inherited political power undermines the core democratic principles of participation, representation, and equal opportunity by concentrating authority within specific families or groups. Moreover, hereditary politics hampers political justice by limiting the diversity of perspectives and ideas within the government. 
When political power is confined to a few reactionary families, groups, the range of voices and viewpoints that influence policy making is significantly reduced. This exclusion of diverse opinions weakens the democratic process and can lead to governance that is out of touch with the realities and aspirations of the citizenry.
Electoral and constitutional democracies are not properties to be inherited based on family lineages. These forms of government are founded on the principles of egalitarian participation and representation, equal opportunity, and the collective will of the people. They are designed to ensure that political power is derived from the consent of the governed, not from inherited privilege. 
Hereditary politics fosters environment where political positions are passed down through generations without regard to merit
Hereditary politics erodes the integrity of democratic institutions by creating an uneven playing field where a select few enjoy disproportionate advantages. 
This practice often leads to governance that prioritises the interests of a narrow elite over the broader population. It stifles innovation and progress by limiting political leadership to a small, privileged group, regardless of their experiences, skills, or public support.
Moreover, the perception that political power can be inherited diminishes public trust in democratic processes. Citizens become disillusioned with a system that appears rigged in favour of entrenched elites, leading to apathy and disengagement. This weakens the very foundation of democracy, which relies on active and informed participation from all segments of society.
In a true democracy, political positions should be accessible to all citizens based on their abilities, ideas, and dedication to public service, rather than on their family lineage. Democratic political leaders are chosen through free and fair elections, reflecting the choices of the electorate. 
This process is meant to provide every eligible citizen with an equal opportunity to participate in the political arena, either as voters or as candidates. When political power is concentrated within specific families and passed down through generations, it undermines these democratic ideals.
Hereditary politics contradicts the foundations of democratic ideals, fostering an environment where power is passed down through generations, often irrespective of competence or public approval. Such a system perpetuates social and economic inequalities by entrenching a ruling class that is insulated from the experiences and struggles of ordinary people. 
This leads to policies and decisions that favour the interests of the elite, rather than addressing the needs of the broader population. As a result, the gap between the wealthy and the poor widens, and social, economic, and political mobility is stifled that derails democratic empowerment of people.
It is necessary to dismantle the structures that support hereditary politics to foster a truly democratic society that upholds individual liberty, social and economic equality, and political justice. It is also essential to encourage and facilitate wider political participation, implementing strict anti-nepotism laws, and promoting transparency and accountability in government are crucial steps to ensure democratic outcomes. 
By ensuring that political power is earned and not inherited, people can create a more equitable and just society that reflects the democratic values that working people aspire to uphold as equal citizens and shareholders of democracy, state, and government. People’s democracy is the only form of sustainable democracy that working people needs to reclaim it to save their citizenship rights.
---
*London Metropolitan University

Comments

TRENDING

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी: जल जीवन मिशन के लक्ष्य को पाने समन्वित प्रयास जरूरी

- राज कुमार सिन्हा*  जल संसाधन से जुड़ी स्थायी समिति ने वर्तमान लोकसभा सत्र में पेश रिपोर्ट में बताया है कि "नल से जल" मिशन में राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी साबित हुए हैं। जबकि देश के 11 राज्यों में शत-प्रतिशत ग्रामीणों को नल से जल आपूर्ति शुरू कर दी गई है। रिपोर्ट में समिति ने केंद्र सरकार को सिफारिश की है कि मिशन पुरा करने में राज्य सरकारों की समस्याओं पर गौर किया जाए। 

Censor Board's bullying delays 'Phule': A blow to India's democratic spirit

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  A film based on the life and legacy of Jyotiba Phule and Savitribai Phule was expected to release today. Instead, its release has been pushed to the last week of April. The reason? Protests by self-proclaimed guardians of caste pride—certain Brahmin groups—and forced edits demanded by a thoroughly discredited Censor Board.

CASR urges immediate halt to Operation Kagaar, calls for peace talks with Maoists

By A Representative   The Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), a collective of over 40 civil society organizations, has issued a press statement demanding an immediate end to "Operation Kagaar" and alleged state-led killings of Maoist rebels and indigenous people in central India. The group also called on the central government to create a conducive environment for initiating peace talks with the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist).

Maoist call for peace talks: A democratic opening amidst state repression?

By Harsh Thakor*  The readiness of the CPI (Maoist), a banned organisation, for peace talks is seen as signifying a democratic gesture that should be welcomed by all who uphold democratic values. The ongoing conflict under ‘Operation Kagaar’ in Central India represents a clash between alleged state aggression and self-defence by oppressed communities. Critics argue that the Indian government has violated constitutional principles by promoting corporate expansion in Adivasi regions under the pretext of development, endangering the lives and livelihoods of local populations.

Incarcerated for 2,424 days, Sudhir Dhawale combines Ambedkarism with Marxism

By Harsh Thakor   One of those who faced incarceration both under Congress and BJP rule, Sudhir Dhawale was arrested on June 6, 2018, one of the first six among the 16 people held in what became known as the Elgar Parishad case. After spending 2,424 days in incarceration, he became the ninth to be released from jail—alongside Rona Wilson, who walked free with him on January 24. The Bombay High Court granted them bail, citing the prolonged imprisonment without trial as a key factor. I will always remember the moments we spent together in Mumbai between 1998 and 2006, during public meetings and protests across a wide range of issues. Sudhir was unwavering in his commitment to Maoism, upholding the torch of B.R. Ambedkar, and resisting Brahmanical fascism. He sought to bridge the philosophies of Marxism and Ambedkarism. With boundless energy, he waved the banner of liberation, becoming the backbone of the revolutionary democratic centre in Mumbai and Maharashtra. He dedicated himself ...

Why crucifixion is a comprehensive message of political journey for the liberation of the oppressed

By Vijayan MJ  Passion week is that time of the year when Christians all over the world remind themselves about the sufferings, anguish, pain and the bloody crucifixion that Jesus Christ took on himself, as part of his mission of emancipating the people and establishing the kingdom of god. The crucifixion was not just a great symbolism of the personal sacrifice of one person, but it was a comprehensive messaging of a political journey for the liberation of the oppressed; one filled with struggle, militancy, celebration of life, rejection of temptations, betrayals, grief, the long-walk with the cross, crucifixion and ultimately resurrection as a symbol of victory over the oppressors and evil. 

How Mumbai University crumbles: Not just its buildings

By Rosamma Thomas*  In recent days, the news from the University of Mumbai has been far from inspiring – clumps of plaster have fallen off the ceiling at the CD Deshmukh Bhavan, and it was good fortune that no one was injured; creepy crawlies were found in the water dispenser that students use to collect drinking water, and timely warning videos circulated by vigilant students have kept people safe so far.

CPM’s evaluation of BJP reflects its political character and its reluctance to take on battle against neo-fascism

By Harsh Thakor*  A controversial debate has emerged in the revolutionary camp regarding the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s categorization of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Many Communists criticize the CPM’s reluctance to label the BJP as a fascist party and India as a fascist state. Various factors must be considered to arrive at an accurate assessment. Understanding the original meaning and historical development of fascism is essential, as well as analyzing how it manifests in the present global and national context.

Akhilesh Yadav’s boycott of Dainik Jagran: A step towards accountability or political rhetoric?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat  Akhilesh Yadav has called for a total boycott of Dainik Jagran, a newspaper owned by the Gupta family. He also declared that the Samajwadi Party will no longer participate in any panel discussions organized by a media channel allegedly controlled by the family or relatives of the omnipresent Rajiv Shukla. Akhilesh Yadav and the Samajwadi Party are well aware that Dainik Jagran has long been antagonistic to Dalit-Bahujan interests. The newspaper represents a Bania-Brahmin corporate and ideological enterprise.