Skip to main content

WHO move can 'enable' India to detain citizens, restrict freedom, control media

Counterview Desk 

In an an open letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, with copies to concerned Cabinet ministers, bureaucrats and MPs,  health rights network PeopleтАЩs Alliance for Public Health (PAPH alias JanSwasthya Morcha), has urged that India should not be a signatory to the World Health Organization (WHO) Pandemic Agreement and Amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005 to be adopted at the 77th World Health Assembly in Geneva from 27th May to 1st June, 2024.
Giving reason, it said, "With the treaty coming into force, in case of an outbreak (or even the threat of) of any infectious disease, the Union of India and its member states would be legally bound to impose treatment protocols, lockdowns, mass vaccinations, vaccine passports, or any other mandate released by WHO."

Text: 

This letter stems from serious apprehension relating a high-priority event of global consequences which is believed to gravely affect the sovereignty of Union of India. As we all remain busy with the Loksabha elections, the government representatives of Union of India along with representatives from other member nations of World Health Organisation will be voting at the 77th World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland from 27th May to 1st June, 2024 for the global adoption of the Draft WHO Pandemic Agreement (Annexure 1). 
Certain amendments to the International Health Regulations 2005 (IHR 2005) are also likely to be added. WHO Pandemic Treaty, which is most likely to be adopted at the World Health Assembly would be a legally binding agreement for all member nations. 
Under the Treaty the countries would need to design their health policies strictly as per WHO guidelines and abide by all the health mandates released by WHO, a transnational entity. Kindly note that this, in principle, is in direct violation of the basic idea of a beneficent public health system where decisions are always taken concurrently by the Centre and the State. 
Any centralised decision-making body for public health (which functions in an absolute top-down approach) ignores the local genetic, climatic, food habit variations and thus leads to a health planning not conducive to public good. 
With the treaty coming into force, in case of an outbreak (or even the threat of) of any infectious disease, the Union of India and its member states would be legally bound to impose treatment protocols, lockdowns, mass vaccinations, vaccine passports, or any other mandate released by the World Health Organisation. 
The Treaty requires all member nations to allocate funds for pandemic preparedness on a regular basis and gives WHO the authoritative power to intervene in matters of national health budget allocations. 
The Union of India would thus become permanently тАШaccountableтАЩ to a transnational body WHO regarding its national health policy. All this is in sheer violation of the sovereignty of our country and also the basic principles of public health.
If the Pandemic Treaty is adopted, the WHO will have sole and extensive power to declare Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEIC) for any potential or real threat for extended areas, be the threats are biological, climatic or environmental. 
The WHO in future would be able to do so without proper convincing proof and be in a decisive position to command all public health measures and treatment protocols to be imposed on the people without informed consent (which violates the Nuremberg Code).
The Treaty is also going to strike discord with the One Health policy adopted in our country. The Treaty would adversely affect the balance set in our health budget allocations for combating malnutrition and for pandemic preparedness. 
Permanently allocating funds for Pandemic Preparedness from our slim health budget may adversely affect the policies adopted by our government to reduce malnutrition, child and infant mortality, child wasting, anaemia, etc which are of paramount concern in a country like ours.
A transnational body like WHO is going to emerge as the overriding authority regarding public health across the globe. The draft of the context, purpose and action areas of this Treaty are described in Annexure 2 where WHO clearly states that the Treaty would function as a тАШframework conventionтАЩ on Pandemic Preparedness and Response where the member nations need to тАЬsupport global coordination through a stronger WHO, as тАШthe directing and coordinating authority on international health workтАЩ, including for pandemic preparedness and responseтАЭ.
The future powers of WHO would then also include the official censorship of information, including free speech тАФ views in disagreement with any official narrative put forward by the WHO тАФ and the WHO would be accountable to no national parliament or be limited by any constitutional safeguards.
The WHO released a Zero Draft of the WHO CA+ (this тАШpandemic treatyтАЩ is now officially known as an тАШAccordтАЩ) with 38 Articles on 1st February 2023 and, subsequently, another draft with 41 Articles on 2nd June 2023. The Accord marks a fundamental change in how the WHO would function in future. 
The draft clearly indicates that the WHO seeks sweeping powers under its director general regarding public health emergencies, public health policies and health budget of every member nation. The Accord facilitates a dictatorship role for the WHO as it moves to acquire unfettered power for an indefinite time period.
The signatories of this Treaty would make clear that, under the proposed accord, the WHO can, at will, call a pandemic, declare a PHEIC and then dictate the national governments to detain their citizens, restrict their free movement, compel them to have vaccine passports (forced testing and vaccination) and tighten media censorship.
Two instruments, the Accord itself and the Amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005, are designed to operate in parallel to give draconian powers to the WHO. Both texts irremediably entail the transfer to the WHO of the power to threaten health freedom, thereby representing a fundamental threat to national, medical and corporal autonomy.
The WHO is a transnational body without any constitutional checks and barriers, which may not and cannot be appointed to such a dictatorial position. The recent turn of events regarding pharma giant Astrazeneca admitting in an UK court about the adverse effects of its Covid-19 vaccine has sent chills down the spines of all conscious individuals who have taken doses of Covishield vaccine under the guidance of WHO and our national panel of experts. Numerous adverse effects of Covaxin have also hit the news recently. The skyrocketing number of sudden cases of heart attack among youngsters and sportspersons has shocked many individuals and this matter was also discussed in the Rajya Sabha on 08.12.2023. 
Since our Union Government has already stayed itself clear off the liabilities of any adverse effects of these vaccines (vide affidavits dated 26.06.2021, 13.01.2022 & writ petition 607 of 2021 filed at the Supreme Court), even the idea of a vaccine passport raises a lot of questions in the mind of any conscious common man. The connection of electoral bonds and trusts with spurious/ untested drugs like Remdesivir, etc sold during the Covid pandemic have also been exposed at the national level. 
Under these circumstances, many people in our country and elsewhere are extremely skeptical about the idea of a transnational entity like WHO being bestowed the supreme power of regulating health policies and mandating treatment protocols.
If adopted at the 77th World Health Assembly in May 2024 by a simple majority vote, the тАШPandemic TreatyтАЩ will come into force within 12 months for all countries, unless a country proactively files rejections or reservations within a 10-month period.
Questions about the WHO Pandemic Treaty have been raised in the Rajya Sabha on 02.02.2024 and in parliaments of United States of America, United Kingdom, Japan and Europian Union. An independent body of experts from India have also written a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the World Health Organisation. 
In Japan, people have taken to the streets protesting against the Pandemic Treaty. A good number of people across India is also raising their dissenting voices. Our organisation PeoplesтАЩs Alliance for Public Health (PAPH alias JanSwasthya Morcha) have been organising awareness campaign about the WHO Pandemic Treaty since our inception in 2022.
We, the members of PeopleтАЩs Alliance for Public Health (PAPH alias JanSwasthya Morcha), earnestly request you to go through the Draft of the WHO Pandemic Treaty and other supportive documents attached as Annexure. Please raise this issue within the Ministry and also the appropriate national authority. 
As the matter is related to National Security, it requires urgent attention of all. Even if the WHO Pandemic Treaty and Amendments to IHR 2005 are adopted at the 77th World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland from 27th May to 1st June, 2024 , our country still has the chance to revoke its decision of agreement with the Treaty within a period of ten months. Let us all work in unison and see that the Treaty does not come into effect for the Union of India.
-- Amartya,  president; Gaurab Mukhuty, secretary. On behalf of members of JanaSwasthya Morcha or PeopleтАЩs Alliance for Public Health (PAPH)

Annexures

Please find attached herewith the following annexures 1-4 as a pdf file:
1. Revised Draft of the WHO Pandemic Agreement (Page 1-29)
https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb9/A_inb9_3-en.pdf
2. WHO Framework Convention on One Health Approach (Page 30-31)
https://apps.who.int/gb/COVID-19/pdf_files/2021/18_03/Item3.pdf
3. Letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi from independent panel of experts from India. (Page 32-41)
https://awakenindiamovement.com/who-pandemic-treaty-ultra-vires-of-the-constitution-16-12-23/
4. News items related to the WHO Pandemic Treaty (Page 42-51)
a. Discussion in Rajya Sabha on Pandemic Treaty on 02.02.2024. https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1490746211575901&ref=sharing
b. Discussion in Rajya Sabha on Rising Cases of sudden heart attacks amongst youngsters and sportspersons on 08.12.2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2mQ89SxxNk
c. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/uk-says-proposed-pandemic-treaty-not-acceptable/ articleshow/110124719.cms
d. https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/11/07/draft-pandemic-treaty-fails-protect-rights
e. https://tiffany.house.gov/media/editorials-letters-and-articles/who-goes-overtime-drafting-
pandemic-treaty-opposition-grows#:~:text=In%20April%2C%20over%20half%20of,sovereignty
%2C%E2%80%9D%20the%20letter%20warned%20
5. Affidavit dated 26.06.2021 filed at the Supreme Court on behalf of Union of India 

Comments

TRENDING

Beyond his riding skill, Karl Umrigar was admired for his radiance, sportsmanship, and affability

By Harsh Thakor*  Karl Umrigar's name remains etched in the annals of Indian horse racing, a testament to a talent tragically cut short. An accident on the racetrack at the tender age of nineteen robbed India of a rider on the cusp of greatness. Had he survived, there's little doubt he would have ascended to international stature, possibly becoming the greatest Indian jockey ever. Even 46 years after his death, his name shines brightly, reminiscent of an inextinguishable star. His cousin, Pesi Shroff, himself blossomed into one of the most celebrated jockeys in Indian horse racing.

AurangzebтАЩs last will recorded by his Maulvi: Allah shouldn't make anyone emperor

By Mohan Guruswamy  AurangzebтАЩs grave is a simple slab open to the sky lying along the roadside at Khuldabad near Aurangabad. I once stopped by to marvel at the tomb of an Emperor of India whose empire was as large as Ashoka the Great's. It was only post 1857 when Victoria's domain exceeded this. The epitaph reads: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast." (The rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave) The modest tomb of Aurangzeb is perhaps the least recognised legacies of the Mughal Emperor who ruled the land for fifty eventful years. He was not a builder having expended his long tenure in war and conquest. Towards the end of his reign and life, he realised the futility of it all. He wrote: "Allah should not make anyone an emperor. The most unfortunate person is he who becomes one." AurangzebтАЩs last will was re...

PUCL files complaint with SC against Gujarat police, municipal authorities for 'unlawful' demolitions, custodial 'violence'

By A Representative   The People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has lodged a formal complaint with the Chief Justice of India, urging the Supreme Court to initiate suo-moto contempt proceedings against the police and municipal authorities in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The complaint alleges that these officials have engaged in unlawful demolitions and custodial violence, in direct violation of a Supreme Court order issued in November 2024.

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

рд░рд╛рдЬрд╕реНрдерд╛рди, рдордзреНрдпрдкреНрд░рджреЗрд╢, рдкрд╢реНрдЪрд┐рдо рдмрдВрдЧрд╛рд▓, рдЭрд╛рд░рдЦрдВрдб рдФрд░ рдХреЗрд░рд▓ рдлрд┐рд╕рдбреНрдбреА: рдЬрд▓ рдЬреАрд╡рди рдорд┐рд╢рди рдХреЗ рд▓рдХреНрд╖реНрдп рдХреЛ рдкрд╛рдиреЗ рд╕рдордиреНрд╡рд┐рдд рдкреНрд░рдпрд╛рд╕ рдЬрд░реВрд░реА

- рд░рд╛рдЬ рдХреБрдорд╛рд░ рд╕рд┐рдиреНрд╣рд╛*  рдЬрд▓ рд╕рдВрд╕рд╛рдзрди рд╕реЗ рдЬреБрдбрд╝реА рд╕реНрдерд╛рдпреА рд╕рдорд┐рддрд┐ рдиреЗ рд╡рд░реНрддрдорд╛рди рд▓реЛрдХрд╕рднрд╛ рд╕рддреНрд░ рдореЗрдВ рдкреЗрд╢ рд░рд┐рдкреЛрд░реНрдЯ рдореЗрдВ рдмрддрд╛рдпрд╛ рд╣реИ рдХрд┐ "рдирд▓ рд╕реЗ рдЬрд▓" рдорд┐рд╢рди рдореЗрдВ рд░рд╛рдЬрд╕реНрдерд╛рди, рдордзреНрдпрдкреНрд░рджреЗрд╢, рдкрд╢реНрдЪрд┐рдо рдмрдВрдЧрд╛рд▓, рдЭрд╛рд░рдЦрдВрдб рдФрд░ рдХреЗрд░рд▓ рдлрд┐рд╕рдбреНрдбреА рд╕рд╛рдмрд┐рдд рд╣реБрдП рд╣реИрдВред рдЬрдмрдХрд┐ рджреЗрд╢ рдХреЗ 11 рд░рд╛рдЬреНрдпреЛрдВ рдореЗрдВ рд╢рдд-рдкреНрд░рддрд┐рд╢рдд рдЧреНрд░рд╛рдореАрдгреЛрдВ рдХреЛ рдирд▓ рд╕реЗ рдЬрд▓ рдЖрдкреВрд░реНрддрд┐ рд╢реБрд░реВ рдХрд░ рджреА рдЧрдИ рд╣реИред рд░рд┐рдкреЛрд░реНрдЯ рдореЗрдВ рд╕рдорд┐рддрд┐ рдиреЗ рдХреЗрдВрджреНрд░ рд╕рд░рдХрд╛рд░ рдХреЛ рд╕рд┐рдлрд╛рд░рд┐рд╢ рдХреА рд╣реИ рдХрд┐ рдорд┐рд╢рди рдкреБрд░рд╛ рдХрд░рдиреЗ рдореЗрдВ рд░рд╛рдЬреНрдп рд╕рд░рдХрд╛рд░реЛрдВ рдХреА рд╕рдорд╕реНрдпрд╛рдУрдВ рдкрд░ рдЧреМрд░ рдХрд┐рдпрд╛ рдЬрд╛рдПред 

CPMтАЩs evaluation of BJP reflects its political character and its reluctance to take on battle against neo-fascism

By Harsh Thakor*  A controversial debate has emerged in the revolutionary camp regarding the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s categorization of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Many Communists criticize the CPMтАЩs reluctance to label the BJP as a fascist party and India as a fascist state. Various factors must be considered to arrive at an accurate assessment. Understanding the original meaning and historical development of fascism is essential, as well as analyzing how it manifests in the present global and national context.

State Human Rights Commission directs authorities to uphold environmental rights in Vadodara's Vishwamitri River Project

By A Representative  The Gujarat State Human Rights Commission (GSHRC) has ordered state and Vadodara municipal authorities to strictly comply with environmental and human rights safeguards during the Vishwamitri River Rejuvenation Project, stressing that the riverтАЩs degradation disproportionately affects marginalized communities and violates citizensтАЩ rights to a healthy environment.  The Commission mandated an immediate halt to ecologically destructive practices, rehabilitation of affected communities, transparent adherence to National Green Tribunal (NGT) orders, and public consultations with experts and residents.   The order follows the Concerned Citizens of Vadodara coalitionтАФenvironmentalists, ecologists, and urban plannersтАФsubmitting a detailed letter to authorities, amplifying calls for accountability. The group warned that current plans to тАЬre-sectionтАЭ and тАЬdesiltтАЭ the river contradict the NGTтАЩs 2021 Vishwamitri River Action Plan, which prioritizes floodpla...

Haven't done a good deed, inner soul is cursing me as sinner: Aurangzeb's last 'will'

Counterview Desk The Tomb of Aurangzeb, the last of the strong Mughal emperors, located in Khuldabad, Aurangabad district, Maharashtra, has this epitaph inscribed on it: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e maa ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast" (the rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave).

How polarization between different ideological trends within the communist movement sharpened in India

By Harsh Thakor*  This article is a rejoinder to A Note on Slogans of тАЬLeft Unity,тАЭ тАЬUnity of the Communist RevolutionariesтАЭ and тАЬMass LineтАЭ by Umair Ahmed, published on the Nazariya blog .

Implications of deaths of Maoist leaders G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya in Chhattisgarh

By Harsh Thakor*  In the wake of recent security operations in southern Chhattisgarh, two senior Maoist leaders, G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya, were killed. These operations, which took place amidst a historically significant Maoist presence, resulted in the deaths of 31 individuals on March 20th and 16 more three days prior.