Skip to main content

Can scientists believe in God, yet explore nature 'abandoning' belief?

By Dr TV Sajeev* 

In August 2023, India celebrated the successful soft-landing of Chandrayan on the south pole of the moon. That mission too led to some questioning about whether scientists could believe in God. The culture of temple visits and poojas before the launch of rockets with or without payload had been a mocking point for a long while. 
On the Chandrayan’s moon landing, however, the chairman of ISRO boldly proclaimed: “I grew up in a religious ambience and the visit to the temple adds to my confidence. It is part of my spiritual pursuit. I don’t see any conflict in leading explorations on outer space and my own inner spiritual explorations.”
Add to this the naming of the point of landing on moon as Shivshakthi Point -- in a country with scores of religions, each having numerous sects, subgroups, and syncretic belief systems within these major religions, this was awkward. Science aims at explaining nature without the agency of God. So how does giving a spiritual and religious aura to a scientific breakthrough like moon landing help its cause?
We also need to differentiate between science and technology. While the former tries to explain nature, the latter tries to develop gadgets to make our life easier. These are two different ball games. While Albert Einstein was a scientist, Thomas Alva Edison was a technologist. While CV Raman was scientist, APJ Abdul Kalam was a technologist. 
All made great contributions, but their fundamental principles were different. While the scientist relies on observation, experimentation and theorization, the technologist stops short of theorization, tasked not with explaining nature, and relying on a great deal of trial and error, as was Edison’s practice. While technology emerges from science, the two are not water-tight compartments. There are many who work at the interface of science and technology.
However, while technologists need not worry about their belief systems when it comes to explaining their work, scientists need to. Science can never take God as an explanatory factor. Diego Maradona attributed his first goal against England in the quarter finals match of the 1986 FIFA World Cup to the “hand of God”, but on a similar achievement, a scientist cannot legitimately make such an attribution. The scientist has no such poetic license. This is entrenched in the practice of science by way of strict peer review and critique.
There was once a couple that arrived in Kerala from France. Their objective was to steer clear of established tourist destinations and experience village life. In the first few days of their stay, they were surprised that village folk knew Marx, Engels, Marquez, Rosa and had good understanding of Russian and American history. Some even cited Nietzhe, Kafka, Camus and Sartre. 
A bigger surprise awaited the couple on Sunday, when they saw the whole village streaming into church and listening with rapt attention to the priest’s sermon! The couple learned how people could live different lives on each day of the week.
There were scientists who believed in God -- William Harvey, Blaise Pascal, Ernst Haeckel, Galileo Galilei, Johannes Kepler, Max Planck, and in a different mode -- Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein. 
There were those who did not believe in God -- Christian Bohr, Sydney Brenner, Subramaniam Chandrasekhar, George Gamov, Samuel Cohen, James Chadwick, Stephen Hawking, Francis Crick, James Watson, Meghnad Saha, Paul Dirac, JBS Haldane, Piere Curie, John Fobs Nash, Robert Oppenheimer, Carl Sagan, Linoy Pauling, Alfred Nobel and the extremely vocal Richard Dawkins. 
There are also scientists in a third camp, who remained agnostic and maintained that nothing could be known about the existence or nature of God. JC Bose, Jon Bardeen, Marie Curie, Edwin Hubble, Freman Dyson, CV Raman, Rosalind Franklin, Enrico Fermi, Carl Sagan, Paul Dirac, Henri Poincare and many others belonged to this category. 
As we can see, all the three camps are quite strong. This essentially mean that the there is no significant bearing of a scientist’s belief in God on his/her potential scientific achievement. So where exists the problem? The problem lies not in personal  professional excellence but in the public domain..
Calling Chandrayan landing spot as Shivshakthi Point is against the principles of Astronomical Union Code for naming celestial spaces
Of all the vocations, why should scientists be questioned about their belief in God? Because they are in the job of explaining nature without attributing explanatory or causative role to God. So if a scientist believes in the existence of God, s/he would have to divide him/herself into two parts -- an inner self which believes that God is a factor in causation of events and an outer professional self which explains nature without any explanatory or causative role attributed to the factor named God. It is this divide which needs to be looked upon more closely in the current context.
The first is the constitutional obligation of all citizens to uphold the spirit of science and scientific temperament. Not all those who study science become scientists. But for all of them, an empirical approach, critical thinking and avoidance of logical fallacies are tools that are very much needed in any walk of life. With a strong spiritual industry in the country thriving on illogical arguments, faith healing and the like, scientific temperament is a valuable asset.
The split between religion and governance which happened during the enlightenment period allowed politics to mature, and became the basis of democracy. Science too was saved from the clutches of religion at that point, to have a fantastic run ever since.
That is why, when we name the spot of the Chandrayan landing as Shivshakthi Point, against the principles of Astronomical Union Code for naming celestial spaces, it is akin to going several steps backward on the independence of science. So even though a scientist’s belief in God would not impact the fabric of scientific practice, there are impact points which would leave long lasting scars that prevent the expansion of the scientific temperament. 
What this also does is that it affirms the view that there are realms science cannot study. In fact, there are no leaves unturned by science, which expands every day through multitudes of disciplines. There are excellent, empirical analyses of myths, like those conducted by anthropoligist Claude Levi Strauss, explaining human thought and culture.
If a scientist is split as an individual between an inner, private domain where he/she pays obeisance to God, and still explores nature while abandoning that belief, it creates a bipolar disorder, which could ripple outwards to general humanity.
It is pertinent to recall that Maradona wrote this in his autobiography: “Now I can say what I couldn't at that moment, what I defined at that time as The Hand of God. What hand of God? It was the hand of Diego!”
The advancement of science has likewise explained away many of the things earlier attributed to God. Storms, thunder, sun, moon, ocean, epidemics etc. are better understood, and God these days has a limited role in explaining natural phenomena. Even though Prime Minister Narendra Modi now asserts that he is not biological born, practitioners of science cannot curtail the fast expanding explanatory potential of science. For things that remain unexplained, we should remember that science is not a closed project.
---
*Chief Scientist, Kerala Forest Research Institute

Comments

TRENDING

Aurangzeb’s last will recorded by his Maulvi: Allah shouldn't make anyone emperor

By Mohan Guruswamy  Aurangzeb’s grave is a simple slab open to the sky lying along the roadside at Khuldabad near Aurangabad. I once stopped by to marvel at the tomb of an Emperor of India whose empire was as large as Ashoka the Great's. It was only post 1857 when Victoria's domain exceeded this. The epitaph reads: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast." (The rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave) The modest tomb of Aurangzeb is perhaps the least recognised legacies of the Mughal Emperor who ruled the land for fifty eventful years. He was not a builder having expended his long tenure in war and conquest. Towards the end of his reign and life, he realised the futility of it all. He wrote: "Allah should not make anyone an emperor. The most unfortunate person is he who becomes one." Aurangzeb’s last will was re...

Beyond his riding skill, Karl Umrigar was admired for his radiance, sportsmanship, and affability

By Harsh Thakor*  Karl Umrigar's name remains etched in the annals of Indian horse racing, a testament to a talent tragically cut short. An accident on the racetrack at the tender age of nineteen robbed India of a rider on the cusp of greatness. Had he survived, there's little doubt he would have ascended to international stature, possibly becoming the greatest Indian jockey ever. Even 46 years after his death, his name shines brightly, reminiscent of an inextinguishable star. His cousin, Pesi Shroff, himself blossomed into one of the most celebrated jockeys in Indian horse racing.

PUCL files complaint with SC against Gujarat police, municipal authorities for 'unlawful' demolitions, custodial 'violence'

By A Representative   The People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has lodged a formal complaint with the Chief Justice of India, urging the Supreme Court to initiate suo-moto contempt proceedings against the police and municipal authorities in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The complaint alleges that these officials have engaged in unlawful demolitions and custodial violence, in direct violation of a Supreme Court order issued in November 2024.

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

Haven't done a good deed, inner soul is cursing me as sinner: Aurangzeb's last 'will'

Counterview Desk The Tomb of Aurangzeb, the last of the strong Mughal emperors, located in Khuldabad, Aurangabad district, Maharashtra, has this epitaph inscribed on it: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e maa ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast" (the rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave).

CPM’s evaluation of BJP reflects its political character and its reluctance to take on battle against neo-fascism

By Harsh Thakor*  A controversial debate has emerged in the revolutionary camp regarding the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s categorization of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Many Communists criticize the CPM’s reluctance to label the BJP as a fascist party and India as a fascist state. Various factors must be considered to arrive at an accurate assessment. Understanding the original meaning and historical development of fascism is essential, as well as analyzing how it manifests in the present global and national context.

State Human Rights Commission directs authorities to uphold environmental rights in Vadodara's Vishwamitri River Project

By A Representative  The Gujarat State Human Rights Commission (GSHRC) has ordered state and Vadodara municipal authorities to strictly comply with environmental and human rights safeguards during the Vishwamitri River Rejuvenation Project, stressing that the river’s degradation disproportionately affects marginalized communities and violates citizens’ rights to a healthy environment.  The Commission mandated an immediate halt to ecologically destructive practices, rehabilitation of affected communities, transparent adherence to National Green Tribunal (NGT) orders, and public consultations with experts and residents.   The order follows the Concerned Citizens of Vadodara coalition—environmentalists, ecologists, and urban planners—submitting a detailed letter to authorities, amplifying calls for accountability. The group warned that current plans to “re-section” and “desilt” the river contradict the NGT’s 2021 Vishwamitri River Action Plan, which prioritizes floodpla...

How polarization between different ideological trends within the communist movement sharpened in India

By Harsh Thakor*  This article is a rejoinder to A Note on Slogans of “Left Unity,” “Unity of the Communist Revolutionaries” and “Mass Line” by Umair Ahmed, published on the Nazariya blog .

Vadodara citizens urge authorities to adhere to environmental mandates in Vishwamitri River Rejuvenation Project

By A Representative   A coalition of environmental activists, ecologists, and urban planners in Vadodara has issued an urgent appeal to state and municipal authorities, demanding strict compliance with court-mandated guidelines for the upcoming Vishwamitri River rejuvenation project. Scheduled to commence in March 2025, the initiative aims to mitigate flooding and restore the river, but citizens warn that current plans risk violating National Green Tribunal (NGT) orders and jeopardizing the river’s fragile ecosystem, home to endangered species like crocodiles and Indian Softshell Turtles.  

Implications of deaths of Maoist leaders G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya in Chhattisgarh

By Harsh Thakor*  In the wake of recent security operations in southern Chhattisgarh, two senior Maoist leaders, G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya, were killed. These operations, which took place amidst a historically significant Maoist presence, resulted in the deaths of 31 individuals on March 20th and 16 more three days prior.