Skip to main content

Neat portrayal of Quit India chapter amidst propaganda films: Ae Watan Mere Watan

By Prem Singh* 

We, a few comrades of Delhi, used to organize an annual programme in the memory of Allah Baksh under the auspices of Samajwadi Manch. On the suggestion of Anil Nauria, the first programme was organized in Queen's Park (opposite New Delhi Railway Station) in 1995 or 1996. 
There was a special reason for this. When the Muslim League passed the Pakistan Resolution in March 1940, Allah Baksh, who was the Premier of Sindh province, organized an anti-partition conference in the same Queen's Park in April 1940. Allah Baksh was not a Congressman. He was the leader of the United Party, and a true supporter of Indian nationalism. Maulana Abul Kalam Azad has praised that conference in тАШIndia Wins FreedomтАЩ.
The Quit India Movement began in August 1942, and Churchill delivered a speech full of contempt towards the people of India in the British Parliament on 10 September. Allah Bakh returned all the honours of the British Raj by writing a letter to Churchill in protest against his speech. On 16 October he was removed as Premier despite his majority in the Assembly, and he was assassinated on 14 May 1943. 
We had invited veteran Gandhian Usha Mehta as the chief guest in the programme. We could get her consent after being asked once. I had the rare opportunity to sit and talk with her for about two hours.
As I came to know that the film 'Ae Watan Mere Watan' (by producer Karan Johar, director Kannan Iyer, and joint writers Darab Farooqui and Kannan Iyer) is based on the life of Usha Mehta, I wanted to watch the film. 
I do not find myself competent enough to comment on the film from the point of view of cine-art. However, I would like to discuss the film in the context of its contents and some of the episodes and characters which represent the contents of the film.
There are five things I liked about this film, which contains some poignant and symbolic scenes. 
First, the title of the film is written in Persian (Urdu) script along with Nagari (Hindi) and Roman (English) scripts. These days in most of the films the tradition of writing titles in Urdu has been abandoned. The beautiful Hindustani language of Hindi films and songs has also been on the decline in the last two decades.
Secondly, Usha Mehta (Sara Ali Khan) and other characters do not seem to have entered the film's arena under any propaganda designs. There may be differing opinions on how much they have been able to absorb the historical period while playing their roles, and how effectively they have played their characters. But they all seem free from the shadow of hyperbolic nationalism currently prevalent in the country. This is a good Gandhian message nuanced by the film.
Usha is the young daughter of Hariprasad Mehta (Sachin Khedekar), a Judge in the British Raj. Usha's historical biography is interwoven with certain personal life episodes. Despite being trapped in the deep conflict between patriotism and paternal love, she dedicates herself to patriotism. It seems as if she is in competition with his close friend and staunch Lohiaite Fahad (Sparsh Srivastava) on the path of patriotism. 
Usha, a 22-year-old student, also wants to take her love affair with Kaushik (Abhay Verma) to a higher level of patriotism. Her aunt (Madhu Raja) also adopts the mantra of 'do or die' after observing the commitment of Usha and her companions. Overwhelmed by Usha's sacrifice and fame, her father also admires her. After her release from Yervada Jail in 1946, about 20,000  people gathered at the station to welcome her.
Usha, Firdous Engineer (Anand Tiwari), Fahad and Kaushik undertake the extremely risky task of broadcasting underground Congress Radio for about three months. The broadcast of Congress Radio became a phenomenon within the first few days. Dr Ram Manohar Lohia (Emraan Hashmi) comes and meets the broadcast team and joins them. 
Jayaprakash Narayan's biographer Prof Bimal Prasad used to say that 'Lohia was a leader of youth. The seniors remained troubled by him.' With his first entry into the film, Lohia becomes friendly with the young revolutionaries. Emraan Hashmi, who plays the character of Lohia, has brought out this aspect of his personality very well.
The radio broadcasting is done in Hindustani and English from different places in Bombay, to avoid the police. Influenced by Gandhi since childhood, Usha has faith in a non-violent mode of resistance to injustice. But she does not shy away from any risk or sacrifice. She has been portrayed as a fearless true Gandhian in the film. When a British officer slaps Usha before arresting her, there is no expression of revenge on his face. One day she asks Lohia whether they are moving away from Gandhiji's path of non-violence. Lohia's тАЬphilosophicalтАЭ reply does not satisfy her. However, she keeps mum.
In fact, during the Quit India Movement the question of violence and non-violence arose with intensity. JP had issued two long letters on this contentious subject to the 'soldiers of freedom' from unknown places in December 1942 and September 1943. Although the genre of film does not have the scope for long debates like the genre of novel, the debate between Usha and Lohia could have been extended to at least four-five dialogues. Because, apart from the philosophical aspect of the question of violence-non-violence, there was also the ground question of the violent incidents taking place in the movement.
Viceroy Linlithgow accused Congress leaders of planning an armed rebellion, and the public of indulging in violent activities. The viceroy was trying to show that the British rule was a very just system, and the Congress and the Indian people opposing it were violent and anarchic. 
In a letter written to the viceroy from jail, Lohia denied all the allegations and highlighted the horrific atrocities of the British rule on the unarmed people. He said that while suppressing the movement, many Jallianwala Baghs happened in the country, but the people of India displayed divine courage and fought non-violently for their freedom. 
Lohia also termed the viceroy's statement as wrong in which he said that less than one thousand people were killed in the movement. Lohia challenged the viceroy stating that under the latter fifty thousand patriots were killed. 
Lohia wrote in the letter, "If we had planned an armed insurrection and our crowds were asked to resort to violence, believe me Linlithgow, Gandhiji would today have been securing a reprieve for you from the free people and their government.тАЭ
Back to the film, Usha makes the last important broadcast of Congress Radio, in which Lohia, in his recorded speech, calls upon the countrymen to 'Bharat roko' i.e. halt everything. Usha gets arrested in the final moments of the broadcast. The police ask her about Lohia's hideout while in captivity. She does not provide any information despite barbaric police atrocities. The torture of Usha Mehta shown in the film indicates how the British police would have treated Lohia after his arrest!
Thirdly, the team of the film knows its focus and range very well. Gateway to India's Independence, the Quit India Movement is an epic event in the history of Indian freedom struggle. It has many complex aspects at the national and international level. Doing justice to all of them and including them in totality is possible only in an epic art-work. 
The team of the film knows they are setting out to depict only one spark of an epic event. That spark is Usha Mehta and her young comrades. Gandhi and Lohia appear in the film; but the film belongs to Usha Mehta and the young revolutionaries from beginning to the end. Congress Radio emerges as an independent character in the film. But being Usha's brain-child, it becomes an extension of her personality.
Fourthly, the team has made the film with a positive perspective. An objective history of the Quit India Movement has not been written so far. The movement had been a subject of controversy within the Congress itself since the days of its preparations. 
When the call was given from Gowalia Tank Maidan on 8th August, the British were not the only ones active in suppressing the movement. There were many forces who were opposing the movement and were spying on the revolutionaries in favour of the British. I found it a good thing that all such elements are not mentioned in the film.
Finally, and most importantly, I feet that the film conveys the basic message of the epic event of the Quit India Movement through the portrayal of a spark. To borrow Lohia's words, the basic message happened to be тАЬan explosion of Indians' will to freedomтАЭ. It is even more remarkable that a young woman  becomes the medium of this message. 
Further, the film quietly presents an inspiring lesson in feminism. Sara Ali Khan has brought this lesson too to life.
A few such films should keep coming amidst propaganda films. However, it is surprising that 'kujat gandhivadi' (heretic Gandhian) Lohia, who was ostracized from the world of pro-English intelligentsia, has been given so much space in a mainstream cinema movie for the first time!
---
*Associated with socialist movement, the author is a former teacher of Delhi University and a fellow of Indian Institute of Advanced Study, Shimla

Comments

TRENDING

AurangzebтАЩs last will recorded by his Maulvi: Allah shouldn't make anyone emperor

By Mohan Guruswamy  AurangzebтАЩs grave is a simple slab open to the sky lying along the roadside at Khuldabad near Aurangabad. I once stopped by to marvel at the tomb of an Emperor of India whose empire was as large as Ashoka the Great's. It was only post 1857 when Victoria's domain exceeded this. The epitaph reads: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast." (The rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave) The modest tomb of Aurangzeb is perhaps the least recognised legacies of the Mughal Emperor who ruled the land for fifty eventful years. He was not a builder having expended his long tenure in war and conquest. Towards the end of his reign and life, he realised the futility of it all. He wrote: "Allah should not make anyone an emperor. The most unfortunate person is he who becomes one." AurangzebтАЩs last will was re...

Beyond his riding skill, Karl Umrigar was admired for his radiance, sportsmanship, and affability

By Harsh Thakor*  Karl Umrigar's name remains etched in the annals of Indian horse racing, a testament to a talent tragically cut short. An accident on the racetrack at the tender age of nineteen robbed India of a rider on the cusp of greatness. Had he survived, there's little doubt he would have ascended to international stature, possibly becoming the greatest Indian jockey ever. Even 46 years after his death, his name shines brightly, reminiscent of an inextinguishable star. His cousin, Pesi Shroff, himself blossomed into one of the most celebrated jockeys in Indian horse racing.

PUCL files complaint with SC against Gujarat police, municipal authorities for 'unlawful' demolitions, custodial 'violence'

By A Representative   The People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has lodged a formal complaint with the Chief Justice of India, urging the Supreme Court to initiate suo-moto contempt proceedings against the police and municipal authorities in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The complaint alleges that these officials have engaged in unlawful demolitions and custodial violence, in direct violation of a Supreme Court order issued in November 2024.

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

State Human Rights Commission directs authorities to uphold environmental rights in Vadodara's Vishwamitri River Project

By A Representative  The Gujarat State Human Rights Commission (GSHRC) has ordered state and Vadodara municipal authorities to strictly comply with environmental and human rights safeguards during the Vishwamitri River Rejuvenation Project, stressing that the riverтАЩs degradation disproportionately affects marginalized communities and violates citizensтАЩ rights to a healthy environment.  The Commission mandated an immediate halt to ecologically destructive practices, rehabilitation of affected communities, transparent adherence to National Green Tribunal (NGT) orders, and public consultations with experts and residents.   The order follows the Concerned Citizens of Vadodara coalitionтАФenvironmentalists, ecologists, and urban plannersтАФsubmitting a detailed letter to authorities, amplifying calls for accountability. The group warned that current plans to тАЬre-sectionтАЭ and тАЬdesiltтАЭ the river contradict the NGTтАЩs 2021 Vishwamitri River Action Plan, which prioritizes floodpla...

Haven't done a good deed, inner soul is cursing me as sinner: Aurangzeb's last 'will'

Counterview Desk The Tomb of Aurangzeb, the last of the strong Mughal emperors, located in Khuldabad, Aurangabad district, Maharashtra, has this epitaph inscribed on it: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e maa ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast" (the rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave).

CPMтАЩs evaluation of BJP reflects its political character and its reluctance to take on battle against neo-fascism

By Harsh Thakor*  A controversial debate has emerged in the revolutionary camp regarding the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s categorization of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Many Communists criticize the CPMтАЩs reluctance to label the BJP as a fascist party and India as a fascist state. Various factors must be considered to arrive at an accurate assessment. Understanding the original meaning and historical development of fascism is essential, as well as analyzing how it manifests in the present global and national context.

How polarization between different ideological trends within the communist movement sharpened in India

By Harsh Thakor*  This article is a rejoinder to A Note on Slogans of тАЬLeft Unity,тАЭ тАЬUnity of the Communist RevolutionariesтАЭ and тАЬMass LineтАЭ by Umair Ahmed, published on the Nazariya blog .

Implications of deaths of Maoist leaders G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya in Chhattisgarh

By Harsh Thakor*  In the wake of recent security operations in southern Chhattisgarh, two senior Maoist leaders, G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya, were killed. These operations, which took place amidst a historically significant Maoist presence, resulted in the deaths of 31 individuals on March 20th and 16 more three days prior.

рд░рд╛рдЬрд╕реНрдерд╛рди, рдордзреНрдпрдкреНрд░рджреЗрд╢, рдкрд╢реНрдЪрд┐рдо рдмрдВрдЧрд╛рд▓, рдЭрд╛рд░рдЦрдВрдб рдФрд░ рдХреЗрд░рд▓ рдлрд┐рд╕рдбреНрдбреА: рдЬрд▓ рдЬреАрд╡рди рдорд┐рд╢рди рдХреЗ рд▓рдХреНрд╖реНрдп рдХреЛ рдкрд╛рдиреЗ рд╕рдордиреНрд╡рд┐рдд рдкреНрд░рдпрд╛рд╕ рдЬрд░реВрд░реА

- рд░рд╛рдЬ рдХреБрдорд╛рд░ рд╕рд┐рдиреНрд╣рд╛*  рдЬрд▓ рд╕рдВрд╕рд╛рдзрди рд╕реЗ рдЬреБрдбрд╝реА рд╕реНрдерд╛рдпреА рд╕рдорд┐рддрд┐ рдиреЗ рд╡рд░реНрддрдорд╛рди рд▓реЛрдХрд╕рднрд╛ рд╕рддреНрд░ рдореЗрдВ рдкреЗрд╢ рд░рд┐рдкреЛрд░реНрдЯ рдореЗрдВ рдмрддрд╛рдпрд╛ рд╣реИ рдХрд┐ "рдирд▓ рд╕реЗ рдЬрд▓" рдорд┐рд╢рди рдореЗрдВ рд░рд╛рдЬрд╕реНрдерд╛рди, рдордзреНрдпрдкреНрд░рджреЗрд╢, рдкрд╢реНрдЪрд┐рдо рдмрдВрдЧрд╛рд▓, рдЭрд╛рд░рдЦрдВрдб рдФрд░ рдХреЗрд░рд▓ рдлрд┐рд╕рдбреНрдбреА рд╕рд╛рдмрд┐рдд рд╣реБрдП рд╣реИрдВред рдЬрдмрдХрд┐ рджреЗрд╢ рдХреЗ 11 рд░рд╛рдЬреНрдпреЛрдВ рдореЗрдВ рд╢рдд-рдкреНрд░рддрд┐рд╢рдд рдЧреНрд░рд╛рдореАрдгреЛрдВ рдХреЛ рдирд▓ рд╕реЗ рдЬрд▓ рдЖрдкреВрд░реНрддрд┐ рд╢реБрд░реВ рдХрд░ рджреА рдЧрдИ рд╣реИред рд░рд┐рдкреЛрд░реНрдЯ рдореЗрдВ рд╕рдорд┐рддрд┐ рдиреЗ рдХреЗрдВрджреНрд░ рд╕рд░рдХрд╛рд░ рдХреЛ рд╕рд┐рдлрд╛рд░рд┐рд╢ рдХреА рд╣реИ рдХрд┐ рдорд┐рд╢рди рдкреБрд░рд╛ рдХрд░рдиреЗ рдореЗрдВ рд░рд╛рдЬреНрдп рд╕рд░рдХрд╛рд░реЛрдВ рдХреА рд╕рдорд╕реНрдпрд╛рдУрдВ рдкрд░ рдЧреМрд░ рдХрд┐рдпрд╛ рдЬрд╛рдПред