Skip to main content

Modi win may force Pak to put Kashmir on backburner, resume trade ties with India

By Salman Rafi Sheikh* 

When Narendra Modi returned to power for a second term in India with a landslide victory in 2019, his government acted swiftly. Just months after the election, the Modi government abrogated Article 370 of the Constitution of India. In doing so, it stripped the special constitutional status conferred on Jammu and Kashmir, IndiaтАЩs only Muslim-majority state, and downgraded its status from a state with its own elected assembly to a union territory administered by the central government in Delhi. 
The move disrupted the tremulous status quo that India and Pakistan had been holding on to in Kashmir for decades: India demanding that Pakistan withdraw from the north and west of Kashmir, which are under PakistanтАЩs administration, and Pakistan demanding a referendum to determine who administers the whole territory, with both parties holding steadfastly to the Line of Control. Angered by the Modi governmentтАЩs move, Pakistan retaliated by suspending trade ties with India.
Until recently, PakistanтАЩs position vis-├а-vis India emphasized a resolution to the Kashmir issue as a prior step to movement on any other matters. Now, with Pakistan in a dire economic crisis, no prospects of a softened stance from India, and a possible third term as prime minister for Modi after IndiaтАЩs looming general election, Pakistan might be forced to seek a resumption of trade ties while putting Kashmir on the backburner.
Ever since Modi became IndiaтАЩs prime minister in 2014, there has always been anticipation in PakistanтАФheightened during each Indian election seasonтАФthat the Modi government will mobilize anti-Pakistan rhetoric to energize its base. In April 2019, at a campaign rally in Rajasthan before the last general election, Modi announced his readiness to use IndiaтАЩs nuclear weapons against Pakistan. тАЬHave we kept our nuclear bomb for Diwali?тАЭ he asked the crowd. Pakistan immediately denounced the remarks as тАЬhighly unfortunate and irresponsibleтАЭ and a foreign office spokesperson called out ModiтАЩs use of such тАЬrhetoric for short-term political and electoral gains, with complete disregard to its effects on strategic stability in South Asia,тАЭ rightly deeming it тАЬregrettable and against norms of responsible nuclear behavior.тАЭ
Modi deployed similar hyperbole while talking about a cross-border commando operation in 2016 and an air raid on PakistanтАЩs territory in early 2019 that New Delhi claimed to have conducted in retaliation for militant attacks on the Indian military in Jammu and Kashmir. The discussion around these operations, which Modi called тАЬsurgical strikes,тАЭ had more political significance in India than actual military significance between India and Pakistan. By now they have even become the subjects of Bollywood movies, making them part of popular discourse in ModiтАЩs favor.
Just this month, the Guardian reported that intelligence officials from both countries had alleged that India had a policy of targeting terrorists on foreign soil, with 20 individuals killed in Pakistan since 2020. While India denied the report, its defense minister, Rajnath Singh, said that if тАЬany terrorist will try to disturb India from Pakistan, we will give muh tod jawaabтАЭ (тАЬa jaw-shattering answerтАЭ). He added, тАЬIf needed, Pakistan mein ghus ke maarengeтАЭ (тАЬIf needed, we will infiltrate Pakistan and kill themтАЭ). Coming into another election season, Singh was repeating ModiтАЩs tough-on-terror rhetoric from the тАЬsurgical strikesтАЭ in 2019. In Pakistan, the report escalated fears over Indian conduct, further weakening the prospects of a normalization of ties between India and PakistanтАФsomething that would entail a demilitarization around Kashmir, an end to cross-border support for militancy by both countries and greater exchanges between Indians and Pakistanis via relaxed visa regimes as well as increased trade and cooperation.
The anti-Pakistan imperatives of ModiтАЩs regional policies, in PakistanтАЩs view, are part of a broader anti-Muslim domestic politics that has defined the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) under Modi. Hindu nationalists have set Indian Muslims up as their hapless punching bags at home, and Pakistan, with its Muslim majority and acrimonious history with India, fills the same role on the regional stage. A recent report by India Hate Lab, a research group based in Washington, D.C., showed 668 recorded incidents of hate speech targeting Muslims in India in 2023. Of these events, 255 came in the first half of the year and 413 in the second halfтАФmarking a 62 percent increase in the build-up to the general election, with the majority of all these incidents taking place in Indian states with BJP governments in power. The dominant view in Pakistan is that this trend, and a corresponding inflammation of anti-Pakistan sentiment, will grow further as the Indian election gets underway in April and May, and also ifтАФor if prevailing predictions are correct, whenтАФModi wins his third consecutive term.
With this anticipation, PakistanтАЩs policymakers think that an India that continues under Modi will not be willing to engage with Pakistan vis-├а-vis Kashmir, and will likely increase its support for militant groups operating against the Pakistan state, including the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan and Baloch separatist outfits. Almost five years after Article 370 was done away with, and with the Supreme Court of India since having dismissed all legal challenges to the validity of the action, the idea of Kashmir as a Delhi-administered region without its earlier special protections and limited autonomy has become deeply entrenched and institutionalized in India. Pakistan cannot realistically expect the Indian state to reverse this position. It will be extremely difficult, if not impossible, for even a non-BJP government to undo this change for fear of popular backlash, and also because of the courtтАЩs judgment declaring that Kashmir has no internal sovereignty that sets it apart from other states and territories.
The Track II channel of diplomacy between India and Pakistan, which entails non-official meetings between retired officials and academics of the two countries, and in earlier decades was vaunted as a source of hope for peace, has also not been able to yield any meaningful results in the Modi years. Not only has it failed to move the needle on the issues of Kashmir and terrorism, but it has not even done so on reopening official channels for dialogues and using diplomacy to resolve conflicts.
With the Indian state locked in on its stand on Kashmir, Pakistan is pushing for a new status quo mirroring the Sino-Indian model of bilateral ties. Broadly, this would mean opening up trade without necessarily pushing for a prior resolution of outstanding territorial disputes. For decades, and despite some clashes in mutually disputed zones in recent years, India and China have been able to steadily carry out and expand bilateral trade, whose present value stands at around $136 billion per year. A 2018 World Bank estimate showed that India-Pakistan trade could grow to $37 billion per year if the right conditions materialize. Pakistan, which has been on the verge of complete economic collapse for the last few years, cannot ignore the critical importance to its future of trade with India, and Islamabad has been trying to find a way to realize its promise.
When the pandemic hit, Pakistan resumed imports of pharmaceuticals from India, nine months after it suspended all trade with this neighbor. As its economic situation has deteriorated, it has lifted more restrictions to avail itself of cheap Indian goods. This March, PakistanтАЩs foreign minister, Ishaq Dar, promised to тАЬseriously look into matters of trade with India.тАЭ It bears emphasizing that it is not just Pakistan that stands to gain: India could gain massive new markets in Pakistan, and resources to further fuel its growth. If anything, with its superior economy, India would secure the majority of the projected $37 billion worth of bilateral tradeтАФand all the political and diplomatic leverage that would also come with it.
Even for the Pakistani military, a minimal normalization of ties with India that can help change the countryтАЩs economic situation, so long as it comes without an overt compromise on Kashmir, is not necessarily a tough bargain. Any subsequent boost to bilateral trade, which could involve the Pakistani militaryтАЩs approval and even participation through its large business holdings, could help the military recover from the recent domestic backlash to its involvement in and manipulation of PakistanтАЩs politics. In addition, if trade can reinforce peace on the border, this might allow the Pakistani military to focus more clearly on dealing with the resurgence of religious and nationalist militancy that has recently gripped parts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan provinces.
Pak lifted restrictions to avail itself of cheap Indian goods. Foreign minister Ishaq Dar promised to look into matters of trade with India
For Pakistan, therefore, there are definite advantages to adopting the тАЬSino-IndianтАЭ framework, but the key question is whether India, led by Modi and the BJP, will be willing to work with Pakistan to develop such a framework. As a corollary, Pakistan should also ask what it can do to convince India to pursue this model of bilateral relations.
The optimistic view is that there is already a base to work from. For more than three years, since February 2021, India and Pakistan have observed a ceasefire along the Line of ControlтАФmaking this one of the longest-lasting ceasefires in the history of both countries and showing how negotiated settlements are possible not only to achieve but also to sustain. This ceasefire was instituted by the Modi government on IndiaтАЩs side, and there is reason to hope it will remain if a fresh Modi-led administration returns to power. In that eventuality, Pakistan can hope that a new Modi government can also be convinced to resume trade relations.
What Pakistan can do to maximize the probability of this is to eliminate any existing support for militant groups seeking the independence of Indian-administered Kashmir. For many years, New Delhi has consistently accused Pakistan of supporting terrorism, and the fact that many Pakistan-based militant groups seek KashmirтАЩs independence reinforces this claim. In 2022, Pakistan showed India it was serious about the issue when it sentenced Hafiz Saeed, the co-founder of the militant organization Lashkar-e-Taiba, to 31 years in prison on charges of financing terror. A larger and decisive break away from these groups might signal PakistanтАЩs readiness to positively engage with India.
Pakistan should also be watching how India has recently shifted its focus in regional relations away from the beleaguered South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) and towards the newer Bay of Bengal Initiative of Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC). BIMSTEC, headquartered in Dhaka, includes all the SAARC countries except Pakistan, Afghanistan, and the Maldives, and also includes Myanmar and Thailand. Leaving behind the western flank of the Subcontinent, and the India-Pakistan quarrels that have so often hobbled SAARC, BIMSTEC is being pitched as an alternative to SAARC and a mechanism to temper ChinaтАЩs influence over the region. BIMSTEC states supported ModiтАЩs withdrawal from the SAARC summit scheduled for late 2016 in Islamabad, which India saw as a diplomatic victory over Pakistan.
BIMSTEC has its own limitations, but its development merits PakistanтАЩs attention, especially in what it says about the future of SAARC. For all its problems, SAARC offers a potential space for Pakistan to engage with India in pursuit of normalization and trade. PakistanтАЩs diplomats may do well to see how its fortunes could be revived.
Where things go next will only be clear after the Indian election. A strong BJP government might not feel the need to sit at a negotiating table with Pakistan, for reasons including its deeply entrenched anti-Pakistan and anti-Muslim politicsтАФor, optimistically, a Modi completely assured of his domestic unassailability might feel he has the room to push for improved ties. There is no hiding, however, that this latter scenario is a remote possibility at best, as is the general possibility of a Sino-Indian-style relationship between India and Pakistan. There is a crucial difference between IndiaтАЩs ties with Pakistan and its ties with China: India and China do not have a communal angle to their territorial conflict. Even if Pakistan wants to move away from its reliance on non-state actors in Kashmir to achieve meaningful improvement in the bilateral relationship, a Modi-led India, with its institutionally cultivated hate against Muslims and Pakistan, is unlikely to take any step that can undermine its political standing at home.
If ModiтАЩs India continues to relentlessly pursue its Hindu nationalist ideals, with an aggressive antipathy towards Muslims and a suppression of the fundamental rights of the Indian Muslim community, it will be equally politically difficult for PakistanтАЩs government to seriously advocate for improved trade and relations, despite its economic desperation.
---
*Assistant professor of politics at Lahore University of Management Sciences. This article is part of тАЬModiтАЩs India from the Edges,тАЭ a special series by Himal Southasian presenting Southasian regional perspectives on Narendra ModiтАЩs decade in power and possible return as prime minister in the 2024 Indian election. The article is distributed in partnership with Globetrotter

Comments

TRENDING

AurangzebтАЩs last will recorded by his Maulvi: Allah shouldn't make anyone emperor

By Mohan Guruswamy  AurangzebтАЩs grave is a simple slab open to the sky lying along the roadside at Khuldabad near Aurangabad. I once stopped by to marvel at the tomb of an Emperor of India whose empire was as large as Ashoka the Great's. It was only post 1857 when Victoria's domain exceeded this. The epitaph reads: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast." (The rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave) The modest tomb of Aurangzeb is perhaps the least recognised legacies of the Mughal Emperor who ruled the land for fifty eventful years. He was not a builder having expended his long tenure in war and conquest. Towards the end of his reign and life, he realised the futility of it all. He wrote: "Allah should not make anyone an emperor. The most unfortunate person is he who becomes one." AurangzebтАЩs last will was re...

Beyond his riding skill, Karl Umrigar was admired for his radiance, sportsmanship, and affability

By Harsh Thakor*  Karl Umrigar's name remains etched in the annals of Indian horse racing, a testament to a talent tragically cut short. An accident on the racetrack at the tender age of nineteen robbed India of a rider on the cusp of greatness. Had he survived, there's little doubt he would have ascended to international stature, possibly becoming the greatest Indian jockey ever. Even 46 years after his death, his name shines brightly, reminiscent of an inextinguishable star. His cousin, Pesi Shroff, himself blossomed into one of the most celebrated jockeys in Indian horse racing.

PUCL files complaint with SC against Gujarat police, municipal authorities for 'unlawful' demolitions, custodial 'violence'

By A Representative   The People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has lodged a formal complaint with the Chief Justice of India, urging the Supreme Court to initiate suo-moto contempt proceedings against the police and municipal authorities in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The complaint alleges that these officials have engaged in unlawful demolitions and custodial violence, in direct violation of a Supreme Court order issued in November 2024.

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

State Human Rights Commission directs authorities to uphold environmental rights in Vadodara's Vishwamitri River Project

By A Representative  The Gujarat State Human Rights Commission (GSHRC) has ordered state and Vadodara municipal authorities to strictly comply with environmental and human rights safeguards during the Vishwamitri River Rejuvenation Project, stressing that the riverтАЩs degradation disproportionately affects marginalized communities and violates citizensтАЩ rights to a healthy environment.  The Commission mandated an immediate halt to ecologically destructive practices, rehabilitation of affected communities, transparent adherence to National Green Tribunal (NGT) orders, and public consultations with experts and residents.   The order follows the Concerned Citizens of Vadodara coalitionтАФenvironmentalists, ecologists, and urban plannersтАФsubmitting a detailed letter to authorities, amplifying calls for accountability. The group warned that current plans to тАЬre-sectionтАЭ and тАЬdesiltтАЭ the river contradict the NGTтАЩs 2021 Vishwamitri River Action Plan, which prioritizes floodpla...

Haven't done a good deed, inner soul is cursing me as sinner: Aurangzeb's last 'will'

Counterview Desk The Tomb of Aurangzeb, the last of the strong Mughal emperors, located in Khuldabad, Aurangabad district, Maharashtra, has this epitaph inscribed on it: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e maa ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast" (the rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave).

CPMтАЩs evaluation of BJP reflects its political character and its reluctance to take on battle against neo-fascism

By Harsh Thakor*  A controversial debate has emerged in the revolutionary camp regarding the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s categorization of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Many Communists criticize the CPMтАЩs reluctance to label the BJP as a fascist party and India as a fascist state. Various factors must be considered to arrive at an accurate assessment. Understanding the original meaning and historical development of fascism is essential, as well as analyzing how it manifests in the present global and national context.

How polarization between different ideological trends within the communist movement sharpened in India

By Harsh Thakor*  This article is a rejoinder to A Note on Slogans of тАЬLeft Unity,тАЭ тАЬUnity of the Communist RevolutionariesтАЭ and тАЬMass LineтАЭ by Umair Ahmed, published on the Nazariya blog .

рд░рд╛рдЬрд╕реНрдерд╛рди, рдордзреНрдпрдкреНрд░рджреЗрд╢, рдкрд╢реНрдЪрд┐рдо рдмрдВрдЧрд╛рд▓, рдЭрд╛рд░рдЦрдВрдб рдФрд░ рдХреЗрд░рд▓ рдлрд┐рд╕рдбреНрдбреА: рдЬрд▓ рдЬреАрд╡рди рдорд┐рд╢рди рдХреЗ рд▓рдХреНрд╖реНрдп рдХреЛ рдкрд╛рдиреЗ рд╕рдордиреНрд╡рд┐рдд рдкреНрд░рдпрд╛рд╕ рдЬрд░реВрд░реА

- рд░рд╛рдЬ рдХреБрдорд╛рд░ рд╕рд┐рдиреНрд╣рд╛*  рдЬрд▓ рд╕рдВрд╕рд╛рдзрди рд╕реЗ рдЬреБрдбрд╝реА рд╕реНрдерд╛рдпреА рд╕рдорд┐рддрд┐ рдиреЗ рд╡рд░реНрддрдорд╛рди рд▓реЛрдХрд╕рднрд╛ рд╕рддреНрд░ рдореЗрдВ рдкреЗрд╢ рд░рд┐рдкреЛрд░реНрдЯ рдореЗрдВ рдмрддрд╛рдпрд╛ рд╣реИ рдХрд┐ "рдирд▓ рд╕реЗ рдЬрд▓" рдорд┐рд╢рди рдореЗрдВ рд░рд╛рдЬрд╕реНрдерд╛рди, рдордзреНрдпрдкреНрд░рджреЗрд╢, рдкрд╢реНрдЪрд┐рдо рдмрдВрдЧрд╛рд▓, рдЭрд╛рд░рдЦрдВрдб рдФрд░ рдХреЗрд░рд▓ рдлрд┐рд╕рдбреНрдбреА рд╕рд╛рдмрд┐рдд рд╣реБрдП рд╣реИрдВред рдЬрдмрдХрд┐ рджреЗрд╢ рдХреЗ 11 рд░рд╛рдЬреНрдпреЛрдВ рдореЗрдВ рд╢рдд-рдкреНрд░рддрд┐рд╢рдд рдЧреНрд░рд╛рдореАрдгреЛрдВ рдХреЛ рдирд▓ рд╕реЗ рдЬрд▓ рдЖрдкреВрд░реНрддрд┐ рд╢реБрд░реВ рдХрд░ рджреА рдЧрдИ рд╣реИред рд░рд┐рдкреЛрд░реНрдЯ рдореЗрдВ рд╕рдорд┐рддрд┐ рдиреЗ рдХреЗрдВрджреНрд░ рд╕рд░рдХрд╛рд░ рдХреЛ рд╕рд┐рдлрд╛рд░рд┐рд╢ рдХреА рд╣реИ рдХрд┐ рдорд┐рд╢рди рдкреБрд░рд╛ рдХрд░рдиреЗ рдореЗрдВ рд░рд╛рдЬреНрдп рд╕рд░рдХрд╛рд░реЛрдВ рдХреА рд╕рдорд╕реНрдпрд╛рдУрдВ рдкрд░ рдЧреМрд░ рдХрд┐рдпрд╛ рдЬрд╛рдПред 

Implications of deaths of Maoist leaders G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya in Chhattisgarh

By Harsh Thakor*  In the wake of recent security operations in southern Chhattisgarh, two senior Maoist leaders, G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya, were killed. These operations, which took place amidst a historically significant Maoist presence, resulted in the deaths of 31 individuals on March 20th and 16 more three days prior.