Skip to main content

Sleeping with the enemy? Ethical behaviour talk amidst physician-pharma interface

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD* 

In recent weeks a flutter was created around a gazette hastily released by the National Medical Commission (NMC) on the Code of Conduct by Registered Medical Practitioners of modern medicine. 
Clause 35 of the Gazette notification, dated 02 Aug 2023 and published on 09 Aug 2023, which has been paused due to push back from many quarters, including the Indian Medical Association (IMA), looks at any alliance between registered medical practitioners of modern medicine and the pharmaceutical industry with a jaundiced eye.
The gazette notification conveys the paranoid attitude of the NMC that any liaison between doctor and the industry is not above board and is rife with conflicts of interest. The attitude of the regulating body consisting of nominated members is reminiscent of an authoritative regressive society where no mixing of the genders was allowed. 
 In such societies any liaison, even between consenting adults of opposite sexes, is considered stigmatizing and has to be above board under the watchful eyes of the parents, if at all that is.
Similarly, according to the NMC diktat, which has been held in abeyance, one should be thankful for small mercies, all doctors are supposed to undergo Continuing Medical Education (CME), now renamed as Continuing Professional Development (CPD), in the form of conferences and workshops which will be free of any pharma sponsorship or funding. Needless to say, doctors should not accept any tours, travels, free lunches, or gifts from the industry.
Fair enough, one should not let your partner shower you with expensive gifts on a first date! But the paternalistic attitude goes further. According to the gazette, doctors need to acquire 30 credit points in a cycle of five years for the renewal of their licenses. This credit points are collected by attending medical conferences and workshops.
As these conferences cannot be sponsored by pharmaceutical industry, they are to be held at NMC approved institutions and the contents of the conferences and workshops will also be closely monitored by the NMC. 
What is to be taught and discussed in these workshops will be decided by the NMC – like a school syllabus! And these diktats are for professional doctors, some with specialist and superspecialist qualifications and many having considerable professional experience.
What can be the reasons for the practitioners of modern medicine to find themselves in this predicament? In recent years while medical advances have enabled many medical miracles, the cost of medical treatment has gone up exponentially due to costly diagnostics, interventions and rise in chronic diseases as a result of increasing lifespan. Along with it inequities in access to health services have increased as well.
The doctor who is working downstream is seen as the face of the medical establishment and faces the wrath of patients and society. But will the isolation of the medical fraternity from industry solve the problem?
Shall we cut the collaboration of the industry with the profession which has propelled great medical advances? Louis Pasteur’s work on rabies vaccine led to the rise of the vaccine industry. Alexander Fleming’s discovery of penicillin changed the course of medical history and spawned the huge pharmaceutical industry. 
These are some shining examples of the benefits of scientists and doctors collaborating with the pharmaceutical industry.
However, there have been shameful misconducts by the members of the profession for personal gains as well. They include fabrication of data from clinical trials to favour the sponsors from the industry and carrying unnecessary diagnostic tests, treatments and surgeries. 
It is these instances which have made some groups lobby for cutting all ties of doctors with the industry – while those who support the physician-industry interface give examples of the spectacular advances resulting out of it.
These two extreme viewpoints have polarized the debate while the need of the moment is to regulate the vast grey zone which falls between these two.
Presently, the contribution of pharmaceutical companies to global health research is substantial. When compared with the research budget of government sources and international health agencies like the WHO and UNICEF the combined aid of pharmaceutical industry rivals and even exceeds those of public sources.
The future will see more and more application of artificial intelligence, machine learning, surgical robotics, telemedicine, disease diagnostic software, newer medical devices and other emerging technologies being applied in medical and health care.
A health policy maker in the WHO or the ICMR has more conflicts of interest than a hundred doctors with stethoscopes
To advance these technologies to their full potential will require doctors to collaborate not only with the pharmaceutical industry but also other industries such as engineering and information technology. It is not only politics which make strange bedfellows. 
For in spite of various conflicts of interests which the interface between the industry and the profession is likely to generate, sleeping with the enemy is inevitable because of the following reasons:
  • Medical progress is good and benefits humankind.
  • Industry is responsible for a large amount of medical progress.
  • Fine tuning industry driven technological advancements for medical application will require active participation of doctors.
  • Isolating the medical profession from the medical industry will result in teaching tomorrow’s doctors yesterday’s medicine.
Given the inevitability of the increasing interface between doctors and the industry how can we ensure ethical behaviour on the part of both the parties, without doctors becoming victims of seduction? This can be achieved by:
  • Teaching medical students and physicians “critical thinking skills” to enable them to differentiate between sound clinical information (good touch) and promotional literature without any evidence base (bad touch). They should be able to appraise evidence and not swayed by propaganda.
  • Promoting “good relationship practices” which cultivate scientific interactions leading to enhancement of skills that will benefit the patient and community without the possibility of the interaction being viewed as an inappropriate or questionable activity.
  • Ensuring “transparency,” “empowerment” and “accountability” from both parties during healthy networking
August bodies like the WHO and even our ICMR have collaboration and networking with the pharmaceutical industry. Currently, the WHO has control over only a quarter of its budget. WHO therefore cannot set the global health agenda and has to do the bidding of rich donors. 
The Gates Foundation itself is responsible for over 88% of the total amount donated by private foundations to the WHO. The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) has also inked a "Declaration of Intent" with the Gates Foundation for collaboration in health research.
Interestingly, in 2013, the Joint Parliamentary Committee had tabled a report (72nd report) to both houses of Parliament indicting the Gates Foundation (PATH) and the ICMR of major ethical violations during conduct of trials of HPV vaccine leading to deaths of tribal girls.
Howzzat NMC!
The real conflicts of interests are upstream at the level of the WHO and ICMR rather than at the downstream where the humble doctor is treating individual patients. The statement, “A lawyer with his briefcase can steal more than a hundred men with guns,” is attributed to Mario Puzo, the author of "Godfather". In the same way, a health policy maker in the WHO or the ICMR has more conflicts of interest than a hundred doctors with stethoscopes.
These conflicts of interests upstream become more concerning in view of the proposed Pandemic Treaty by the WHO. Dr David Bell, a former senior scientist with the WHO, has cautioned that this treaty can lead to perpetual lockdowns and threaten autonomy of nations who sign this treaty.
The treaty will create a bureaucracy whose existence will depend on pandemics. They will have vested interests in finding outbreaks and declaring them as potential pandemics. And they will make lockdowns a permanent feature of pandemic response. The influence of corporate on decision making by the WHO has surfaced frequently in recent times.
Similarly, besides signing a “Declaration of Intent” with the Gates Foundation, the ICMR also collaborated with the vaccine industry during the recent pandemic. And more interestingly, with its skin in the game the ICMR is investigating vaccine related adverse events!
NMC, please note.
---
*Professor in a Medical College in Pune; earlier served in the Indian Armed Forces as a field epidemiologist; currently Chairperson, Institutional Ethical Committee, National Institute of Virology, Pune (ICMR), and Chairperson, Institutional Ethical Committee, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune; formerly Chairperson, Institutional Ethical Committee, Chellaram Diabetic Institute, Pune

Comments

TRENDING

Defeat of martial law: Has the decisive moment for change come in South Korea?

By Steven Lee  Late at night on December 3, soldiers stormed into South Korea’s National Assembly in armored vehicles and combat helicopters. Assembly staff desperately blocked their assault with fire extinguishers and barricades. South Korea’s President Yoon Suk Yeol had just declared martial law to “ eliminate ‘anti-state’ forces .”

70,000 migrants, sold on Canadian dream, face uncertain future: Canada reinvents the xenophobic wheel

By Saurav Sarkar*  Bikram Singh is running out of time on his post-study work visa in Canada. Singh is one of about 70,000 migrants who were sold on the Canadian dream of eventually making the country their home but now face an uncertain future with their work permits set to expire by December 2024. They came from places like India, China, and the Philippines, and sold their land and belongings in their home countries, took out loans, or made other enormous commitments to get themselves to Canada.

A groundbreaking non-violent approach: Maharishi’s invincible defense technology

By MajGen (R) Kulwant Singh, Col (R) SP Bakshi, Col (R) Jitendra Jung Karki, LtCol (R) Gunter Chassé & Dr David Leffler*  In today’s turbulent world, achieving lasting peace and ensuring national security are more urgent than ever. Traditional defense methods focus on advanced weapons, military strategies, and tactics, but a groundbreaking approach offers a new non-violent and holistic solution: Maharishi’s Invincible Defense Technology (IDT). 

This Indian British Marxist blamed USSR's collapse in 1991 on Khrushchev's 'revisionism'

By Harsh Thakor*  Harpal Singh Brar, British Indian Marxist scholar and communist leader, has passed away in Chandigarh. He was 85. He was a lifelong supporter of socialism, Marxism, and the working class. He will be remembered among British Communists.

Chalapathi's death in encounter suggests Maoists' inability to establish broader mass support

By Harsh Thakor* The Maoist movement experienced a significant loss during the Ramagudem encounter on January 21, with the death of Chalapathi (Pratap), a Central Committee member of the CPI (Maoist). His death, along with 15 others, marks a major setback for the movement. Reports suggest that his location was revealed to security forces through a selfie with his wife.

Why do we mostly resist and refrain from communicating on sanitation topic?

By Nikhil Kumar, Mansee Bal Bhargava* According to UN SDG Progress report (2022), at the present moment no targets for SDG 6 are expected to be met by 2030. In 2022, 2.2 billion people had no access to safe drinking water and 3.5 million lacked safe sanitation. Approximately 50% of the world’s population was reported to have been under resourced in enough water for part of the year and a quarter of that population was living under “extremely high” water stress. Add to it, droughts have affected over 1.4 billion people between 2002 and 2021.

Govt of India asked to work for release of 217 Indian fishermen detained in Pakistan since 2021

By A Representative  Members of the fishing communities from Gujarat and Diu, Union Territory, held a press conference in Ahmedabad, urging the Union Government to take proactive measures to secure the release of Indian fishermen currently detained in Pakistan. Presently, 217 Indian fishermen, mostly from Gujarat and Diu, are held in Pakistan’s Malir Jail. Of these, 53 have been incarcerated since 2021 and 130 since 2022.

34 Dalit families in IIT Kanpur without toilets in Open Defecation Free India

By Sandeep Pandey   When Indian Institute of Technology at Kanpur was set up in 1959, two villages were uprooted. The farmers were given meagre compensation for the standing crop. No compensation was given for the land to build this institute of national importance. Each family was promised a job but what was not told to them was that one would require specialised skills to get a job at IIT. Some members of these families were, of course, absorbed for menial work. Some washerfolk families were also invited from outside to live on campus to take care of the laundry needs of students, staff and faculty members. One of these men was cajoled by IIT authorities then to forego a regular employment at IIT and instead take up clothes washing work.

अल्पसंख्यक कार्य मंत्रालय का बजट निराशाजनक: 19.3% अल्पसंख्यकों के लिए मात्र 0.0661% ठोस आवंटन

- मुजाहिद नफ़ीस*   1-2-2025 को भारत सरकार द्वारा संसद में वर्ष 2025-26 का बजट वित्त मंत्री निर्मला सीतारमण जी ने पेश किया| इस वर्ष का बजट 5065345 करोड़ है जो कि पिछले साल के संशोधित अनुमान से लगभग 7.39% की बढ़ोतरी हुई है| वहीं अल्पसंख्यक कार्य मंत्रालय का बजट मात्र 3350.00 करोड़ है जो कि कुल बजट का 0.0661% लगभग है|  पिछले साल 2024-25 में 3183.24 करोड़ था|

जाति-व्यवस्था, पितृ सत्ता, धार्मिक अंधविश्वास, पाखंड, लैंगिक असमानता, छुआछूत, सामाजिक भेदभाव पर पेरियार के तार्किक विचार

- जर्नादन रविदास   प्रमोद रंजन द्वारा संपादित पुस्तक ‘जाति-व्यवस्था और पितृसत्ता’ भारत का सुकरात कहे जाने वाले ई. वी. रामास्वामी पेरियार के इस विषय पर केंद्रित लेखों और भाषणों का संग्रह है। इस पुस्तक में हम पेरियार के बहुत ही तार्किक विचारों को पाते हैं। मसलन, पेरियार का कहना है कि “मैं विवाह या शादी जैसे शब्दों से सहमत नहीं हूं। मैं इसे केवल जीवन में साहचर्य के लिए एक अनुबंध मानता हूं।” इसी तरह वे कहते हैं कि “जो आदमी ईश्वर और धर्म में विश्वास रखता है, वह आजादी हासिल करने की कभी उम्मीद नहीं कर सकता।”