Omission of duty by BSF and police: Hindu forcefully kidnapped, taken to Bangladesh

Kirity Roy, Secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), & National Convenor, Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI) writes to the Chairman, National Human Rights Commission:

***

I am writing this to focus on the life and situation of the poor and marginalized villagers living alongside the Indo-Bangladesh border of West Bengal. Through the several complaints we made throughout the years to your good office, it is now evident that the people of this border are living in an acute crisis, not only from a financial perspective but also in terrible distress. The people of the border are devoid of their basic rights and are subjected to immense torture, harassment and restrictions mostly enacted by the Border Security Force personnel, who are supposed to be posted at the international borders with intentions to protect the Indian citizenry. However, on the contrary, incidents of victimizing Indian citizens are being witnessed at large by the BSF.
130 Bhotbari village is an Indo-Bangladesh bordering village situated under Mekhliganj Sub Division and under Kuchlibari Police Station in the district of Cooch Behar. The Central Public Works Department did not construct any fencing in this village. Border Security Force personnel attached with Oran Border Out Post, ‘D’ Company; 6 Battalion posted there 150 meters distance from the International Border Pillar (IBP) and inside the village of 130 Bhotbari.
Mr. Sambhu Singha Sarkar is a villager of 130 Bhotbari village. No other family members reside with him in this village. His elder brother is residing in the Mekhliganj town. Mr. Sambhu runs his family by farming on his own land. Dahagram colony Para village under Bangarbari Patgram Police Station in the district of Lalmonirhat, Bangladesh is very close to the house of Mr. Sambhu Singha Sarkar. As there was no fencing in the border in this village, the miscreants from the Bangladesh side came in the Indian land and kidnapped Mr. Sambhu Singha Sarkar. The BSF who are in charge of protecting the border of the country are posted far inside Indian mainland giving free access to Bangladeshi intruders and risking the lives of several villagers of the border.
On 11.08.2022 at about 11 pm at night several miscreants from Dahagram Colony Para village under Bangarbari Patgram Police Station in the district of Lalmonirhat, Bangladesh entered into the Indian Territory. The Names of the miscreants are (i)Mr. Hasmat Ali, son of Akar Ali Mian; (ii) Abdullah Mian, son of Kahiam Mian; (iii) Maizu Mian; (iv) Tatin Mian. These Bangladeshi miscreants broke through the tin fence and entered the house of Mr. Sambhu and kidnapped him and took him to Bangladesh. Even though the neighbours understood this incident, they could not come out from their house that night out of fear.
Our fact finding team talked with the villagers of 130 Bhotbari. They informed that on 11.08.2022 at about 7 to 8 pm Border Security Force personnel attached with Oran Border Out Post apprehended one Mr. Hafijuddin from Bangladesh allegedly during the time of cross – border - smuggling. Out of vengeance, family members of Mr. Hafijuddin kidnapped Mr. Sambhu Singha Sarkar, an Indian citizen.
On 12.08.2022 the elder brother of Mr. Sambhu Singha Sarkar and his son went to the Oran Border Out Post and informed the incident of kidnapping of Mr. Sambhu by some Bangladeshi miscreants. On the said day BSF of Oran BOP and Border Guards Bangladesh (BGB) conducted one flag meeting. In the meeting BSF was informed that one Indian man namely Mr. Sambhu Singha Sarkar had been missing and BGB told them that they will try to find the missing man. Mr. Goutam Singha Sarkar, nephew of the kidnapped victim told our fact finding team that despite saying repeatedly that his uncle was kidnapped by some Bangladeshi miscreants, BSF did not communicate to the BGB of that incident in the said meeting. At about 7 pm on the same date another flag meeting was conducted between BSF and BGB. In the said meeting officers of the Border Guards Bangladesh told that if BSF would release the Bangladeshi man whom they had been apprehended the previous day, they will also release Mr. Sambhu Singha Sarkar. In reply BSF people informed that they did not apprehend any Bangladeshi man. The meeting ended without any decision.
On 13.08.2022 the family members of Mr. Sambhu Singha Sarkar received information that the victim was imprisoned in the Lalmonirhat District Jail. On the said day Mr. Goutam Singha Sarkar lodged one written complaint to the Officer-in-Charge, Kuchlibari Police Station. Concerned police just put down the incident in the General Diary Entry vide Kuchlibari Police Station GDE no. 395 dated 13.08.2022. On 16.08.2022 he again lodged another written complaint to the Sub Divisional Officer, Mekhliganj, Cooch Behar but till date no action has been taken by the concerned police and administration.
The villagers from several such border areas in Cooch Behar district are living in terrible distress as such incidents happen often. In some cases, the victim doesn’t even return. The BSF who are in charge of protecting the border of the country are being posted far inside the Indian mainland giving free access to Bangladeshi intruders and risking the lives of several villagers of the border. The villagers are mostly scared to lodge any complaint against the BSF as they fear that they will be victimized by the wrath of the men in uniform.
The house of the victim is located inside the Indian Territory. There is no fencing on the border in this village. BSF personnel are not posted at the border; they are posted well inside the Indian Territory. According to locals, Bangladeshi miscreants came into the Indian Territory and entered the house of the victim by breaking through the tin fence and abducted the victim and they managed to escape. The brutal incident raises several questions on the safety and security of the Indian citizens residing along the border. Our concern is:

How can armed forces from the neighboring country enter Indian territory and kidnap an Indian citizen?
Why was BSF not posted at the international border to contain intruders from entering Indian Territory?
Why was BSF not able to protect the integrity of the international border?
Who is responsible for the safety and security of the Indian citizens residing at the border villages?

Article 31 of Constitution of Bangladesh guarantees, “….. action detrimental to the life, liberty, body, reputation or property of any person shall be taken except in accordance with law”. Mr. Sambhu Singha Sarkar was kidnapped by Bangladeshi miscreants while he was sleeping at night in his own house situated in Indian Territory. Officers of the Border Guards of Bangladesh offered a condition that if BSF would return the apprehended Bangladeshi man, they would return Mr. Sambhu and ultimately the victim was sent to the prison. So the Government of Bangladesh is duty bound to respect its constitutional mandate and take proper steps accordingly.
From the above stated incident it is revealed that Bangladeshi miscreants are now governing the Border Guards of Bangladesh. Why did BGB make such a condition in the flag meeting that if BSF would release the apprehended Bangladeshi man, they would release Mr. Sambhu?
The villagers of Indo-Bangladesh border villages live under similar circumstances, where they are under constant threats from foreign intruders. While the BSF is responsible for guarding the international border and protecting the citizens of the country, it is a huge failure on their part as they are stationed inside villages located about 1 kilometer in some places and 10 to 15 kilometers in some other places. There are several instances where Bangladeshi criminals intrude inside Indian lands and ransack crops of Indian citizenry incurring grave losses. In all these instances, the BSF is a silent spectator as they are posted inside villages leaving the borders unguarded.
Article 21 of the Constitution of India guarantees the right to life of every man within the territory of India. Mr. Sambhu is an Indian citizen who was kidnapped by Bangladeshi miscreants from his own house and now imprisoned in Bangladesh jail. BSF personnel failed to protect its citizens and therefore, curtail the right to life of the victim. The incident and the action of the BSF and BGB violate Article 5, 6, 9, 10 and 11 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) which the Government of India did ratify. The BSF and BGB both violate several Articles of the Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials; Adopted by General Assembly resolution 34/169 of 17 December 1979 and the ‘Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment', adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 43/173 of 9 December 1988. The random actions by the BSF also violates the Goal numbers 8 and16 of Sustainable Development Goal earmarked by the United Nations and the government of India is a party and has agreement in these international instruments.
Under the circumstances, I would request the Commission to look into the matter and take necessary actions in order to resolve the issue. I request your urgent intervention in this matter:-

The whole incident must be investigated by a neutral agency appointed by the Commission
Immediately take proper action to bring back the victim from the Lalmonirhat District Jail, Bangladesh to his own house in India.
BSF should protect the safety and security of citizen of India
BSF should guard the actual borders and not be stationed inside villages.
Punitive actions should be taken against the negligent BSF personnel.

Comments

राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी: जल जीवन मिशन के लक्ष्य को पाने समन्वित प्रयास जरूरी

- राज कुमार सिन्हा* जल संसाधन से जुड़ी स्थायी समिति ने वर्तमान लोकसभा सत्र में पेश रिपोर्ट में बताया है कि "नल से जल" मिशन में राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी साबित हुए हैं। जबकि देश के 11 राज्यों में शत-प्रतिशत ग्रामीणों को नल से जल आपूर्ति शुरू कर दी गई है। रिपोर्ट में समिति ने केंद्र सरकार को सिफारिश की है कि मिशन पुरा करने में राज्य सरकारों की समस्याओं पर गौर किया जाए।

Beyond his riding skill, Karl Umrigar was admired for his radiance, sportsmanship, and affability

By Harsh Thakor* Karl Umrigar's name remains etched in the annals of Indian horse racing, a testament to a talent tragically cut short. An accident on the racetrack at the tender age of nineteen robbed India of a rider on the cusp of greatness. Had he survived, there's little doubt he would have ascended to international stature, possibly becoming the greatest Indian jockey ever. Even 46 years after his death, his name shines brightly, reminiscent of an inextinguishable star. His cousin, Pesi Shroff, himself blossomed into one of the most celebrated jockeys in Indian horse racing.

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das* India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

Aurangzeb’s last will recorded by his Maulvi: Allah shouldn't make anyone emperor

By Mohan Guruswamy Aurangzeb’s grave is a simple slab open to the sky lying along the roadside at Khuldabad near Aurangabad. I once stopped by to marvel at the tomb of an Emperor of India whose empire was as large as Ashoka the Great's. It was only post 1857 when Victoria's domain exceeded this. The epitaph reads: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast." (The rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave) The modest tomb of Aurangzeb is perhaps the least recognised legacies of the Mughal Emperor who ruled the land for fifty eventful years. He was not a builder having expended his long tenure in war and conquest. Towards the end of his reign and life, he realised the futility of it all. He wrote: "Allah should not make anyone an emperor. The most unfortunate person is he who becomes one." Aurangzeb’s last will was re...

PUCL files complaint with SC against Gujarat police, municipal authorities for 'unlawful' demolitions, custodial 'violence'

By A Representative The People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has lodged a formal complaint with the Chief Justice of India, urging the Supreme Court to initiate suo-moto contempt proceedings against the police and municipal authorities in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The complaint alleges that these officials have engaged in unlawful demolitions and custodial violence, in direct violation of a Supreme Court order issued in November 2024.

Incarcerated for 2,424 days, Sudhir Dhawale combines Ambedkarism with Marxism

By Harsh Thakor One of those who faced incarceration both under Congress and BJP rule, Sudhir Dhawale was arrested on June 6, 2018, one of the first six among the 16 people held in what became known as the Elgar Parishad case. After spending 2,424 days in incarceration, he became the ninth to be released from jail—alongside Rona Wilson, who walked free with him on January 24. The Bombay High Court granted them bail, citing the prolonged imprisonment without trial as a key factor. I will always remember the moments we spent together in Mumbai between 1998 and 2006, during public meetings and protests across a wide range of issues. Sudhir was unwavering in his commitment to Maoism, upholding the torch of B.R. Ambedkar, and resisting Brahmanical fascism. He sought to bridge the philosophies of Marxism and Ambedkarism. With boundless energy, he waved the banner of liberation, becoming the backbone of the revolutionary democratic centre in Mumbai and Maharashtra. He dedicated himself ...

Censor Board's bullying delays 'Phule': A blow to India's democratic spirit

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* A film based on the life and legacy of Jyotiba Phule and Savitribai Phule was expected to release today. Instead, its release has been pushed to the last week of April. The reason? Protests by self-proclaimed guardians of caste pride—certain Brahmin groups—and forced edits demanded by a thoroughly discredited Censor Board.

State Human Rights Commission directs authorities to uphold environmental rights in Vadodara's Vishwamitri River Project

By A Representative The Gujarat State Human Rights Commission (GSHRC) has ordered state and Vadodara municipal authorities to strictly comply with environmental and human rights safeguards during the Vishwamitri River Rejuvenation Project, stressing that the river’s degradation disproportionately affects marginalized communities and violates citizens’ rights to a healthy environment. The Commission mandated an immediate halt to ecologically destructive practices, rehabilitation of affected communities, transparent adherence to National Green Tribunal (NGT) orders, and public consultations with experts and residents. The order follows the Concerned Citizens of Vadodara coalition—environmentalists, ecologists, and urban planners—submitting a detailed letter to authorities, amplifying calls for accountability. The group warned that current plans to “re-section” and “desilt” the river contradict the NGT’s 2021 Vishwamitri River Action Plan, which prioritizes floodpla...

CPM’s evaluation of BJP reflects its political character and its reluctance to take on battle against neo-fascism

By Harsh Thakor* A controversial debate has emerged in the revolutionary camp regarding the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s categorization of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Many Communists criticize the CPM’s reluctance to label the BJP as a fascist party and India as a fascist state. Various factors must be considered to arrive at an accurate assessment. Understanding the original meaning and historical development of fascism is essential, as well as analyzing how it manifests in the present global and national context.

Implications of deaths of Maoist leaders G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya in Chhattisgarh

By Harsh Thakor* In the wake of recent security operations in southern Chhattisgarh, two senior Maoist leaders, G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya, were killed. These operations, which took place amidst a historically significant Maoist presence, resulted in the deaths of 31 individuals on March 20th and 16 more three days prior.

Search This Blog