Skip to main content

Amoral sycophant 'used' to replace Dalit, tribal, minorities' plight with helpless Pandits

Vivek Agnihotri, wife Pallavi Joshi with Modi
By Ajit Singh* 
One election is enough to divide India on communal lines but this time a Bollywood movie has taken this hot space and is doing phenomenally well to widen the polarized discourse. The ‘Kashmir Files’ directed by Vivek Agnihotri have attempted to showcase the stories of horrors and impeccable crimes committed against the Pandits from the Valley who were forced to leave their homes in the backdrop of upsurge in militancy during the early 90s.
The far right bot squads are in full swing to persuade everyone that the film is closest to the truth and have even urged the Film Federation of India to nominate it for Academy Awards. Several BJP ruled states including the big ones like Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat and Karnataka have waived off the GST and entertainment cess to make it tax free.
When politicians give something for free it's better to see it with the lens of apprehension. The movie has all the ingredients that the BJP needed to push its narrative of hatred. In a scene, one of the protagonists (Anupam Kher) is trying to convince his grandson that Azadi is the song of terrorism and those students and academics who are demanding the liberation of Kashmir from occupation of a 'settler state' are part of a larger sinister network aka tukde-tukde (separatists) gang and urban Naxals. The film also seems to push the Hindu victimization card that perfectly fits with BJP's crafted hysteria of "Hindu khatre mein hai" (Hindus are in danger).
The creative liberty granted to artistes for expanding the horizon of cinema have been efficiently used by the director to paint every Kashmiri Muslims as some kind of collaborator and advertently put all the blame on their heads for the tragedy that befallen on Pandits.
This three hour long movie feels excessively dramatic and the makers didn't even bother to back their hollow propaganda with some convincing arguments. Perhaps they concur that logic belongs to the bygone days and in the age of populism, selective and biased reading of past events can keep the ball rolling.
The tale of exodus is incomplete without exploring the reasons as to what prompted the local inhabitants to burn the soul of Kashmiriyat into ashes.
Since Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) acceded to India in 1947, the Indian National Congress at the Center devoid the region of transparent democratic electoral process. Legislative elections of 1987 saw the voter turnout close to 75 percent, Muslim United Front (MUF) was expected to claim a landslide victory but Delhi didn't approved the results and on its direction ballot rigging was done on a massive scale that helped the National Conference to retain power in J&K.
Pro-independence factions illustrated the election fraud as the betrayal of people's trust and used this incident to fan the flames of separatism. Global events including the First Intifada and the disintegration of the Soviet Union proved to be a driving force and provided a fertile ground for the militant uprising in the Valley.
The 1990s was the period of India's tryst with Hindu nationalists. Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi was taking his deepest dives in the politics of opportunism, a few years later BJP sponsored Rath Yatra which was led by Lal Krishna Advani in support of Ram Temple in Ayodhya led to 166 communal riots in which 564, mostly Muslims, were killed.
In 1989, 12,000 people, mostly civilians, were mowed down, dashing Kashmiri hope in democracy. Pandits were seen as supporters of security forces
During the same time, the Indian military in Kashmir was cold-bloodedly hammering the voices of dissent; a report published by the Human Rights Watch in 1993 revealed that in three and a half years after the electoral collusion in 1989 almost 12,000 people, most of them civilians, were mowed down.
The indiscriminate use of lethal weapons, extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, rape and barbarity had reached to the saturation level. These were the reasons that resulted in the alienation of the Kashmiri hope in Indian democracy, and Pandits who were perceived as  sympathizers and ardent supporters of security forces and BJP's Hindutva image became an easy target of militants and armed rebels.
This movie can be seen as the reflection of modern India. Muslims, Dalits, tribals and free thinkers have been replaced with "helpless" Pandits. The country is okay with calls of ethnic cleansing of Muslims; it also brazenly celebrates the ban of certain cultural attires and cheers when legislations were passed to seize their citizenship.
The Modi government's apartheid policies, deafening silence of the Indian people and on some occasions their bolstering expectations from the state to lower the Muslims' constitutional status to second class citizens may bring out the Frankenstein monster that in the words of Arundhati Roy will consume India.
As far as Kashmiri Pandits are concerned they have every right to present their version of story but they shouldn't hire an amoral sycophant to do this job who won't shy away to use every nasty tricks from the fascist playbook to create irreparable fault lines that will ultimately help the incumbent political party to dismantle democracy in the garb portraying the true accounts of victims.
The “Kashmir Files” has tried to justify the unilateral actions of the government, one of them is the unconstitutional abrogation of Article 370 that really had nothing to do with the exodus of Pandits.
A film that is stuffed with nefarious ulterior motives and propagate the malice against people from particular sections cannot be made to stand in the line of worthy contenders that could represent India on prestigious International platforms. 
Calling this dross as India's "Schindler's List" is definitely an insult to Jews and their hurtful legacy.
---
*Sophomore in Bachelor's in Education (BEd) programme

Comments

TRENDING

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी: जल जीवन मिशन के लक्ष्य को पाने समन्वित प्रयास जरूरी

- राज कुमार सिन्हा*  जल संसाधन से जुड़ी स्थायी समिति ने वर्तमान लोकसभा सत्र में पेश रिपोर्ट में बताया है कि "नल से जल" मिशन में राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी साबित हुए हैं। जबकि देश के 11 राज्यों में शत-प्रतिशत ग्रामीणों को नल से जल आपूर्ति शुरू कर दी गई है। रिपोर्ट में समिति ने केंद्र सरकार को सिफारिश की है कि मिशन पुरा करने में राज्य सरकारों की समस्याओं पर गौर किया जाए। 

Censor Board's bullying delays 'Phule': A blow to India's democratic spirit

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  A film based on the life and legacy of Jyotiba Phule and Savitribai Phule was expected to release today. Instead, its release has been pushed to the last week of April. The reason? Protests by self-proclaimed guardians of caste pride—certain Brahmin groups—and forced edits demanded by a thoroughly discredited Censor Board.

PUCL files complaint with SC against Gujarat police, municipal authorities for 'unlawful' demolitions, custodial 'violence'

By A Representative   The People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has lodged a formal complaint with the Chief Justice of India, urging the Supreme Court to initiate suo-moto contempt proceedings against the police and municipal authorities in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The complaint alleges that these officials have engaged in unlawful demolitions and custodial violence, in direct violation of a Supreme Court order issued in November 2024.

Aurangzeb’s last will recorded by his Maulvi: Allah shouldn't make anyone emperor

By Mohan Guruswamy  Aurangzeb’s grave is a simple slab open to the sky lying along the roadside at Khuldabad near Aurangabad. I once stopped by to marvel at the tomb of an Emperor of India whose empire was as large as Ashoka the Great's. It was only post 1857 when Victoria's domain exceeded this. The epitaph reads: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast." (The rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave) The modest tomb of Aurangzeb is perhaps the least recognised legacies of the Mughal Emperor who ruled the land for fifty eventful years. He was not a builder having expended his long tenure in war and conquest. Towards the end of his reign and life, he realised the futility of it all. He wrote: "Allah should not make anyone an emperor. The most unfortunate person is he who becomes one." Aurangzeb’s last will was re...

Incarcerated for 2,424 days, Sudhir Dhawale combines Ambedkarism with Marxism

By Harsh Thakor   One of those who faced incarceration both under Congress and BJP rule, Sudhir Dhawale was arrested on June 6, 2018, one of the first six among the 16 people held in what became known as the Elgar Parishad case. After spending 2,424 days in incarceration, he became the ninth to be released from jail—alongside Rona Wilson, who walked free with him on January 24. The Bombay High Court granted them bail, citing the prolonged imprisonment without trial as a key factor. I will always remember the moments we spent together in Mumbai between 1998 and 2006, during public meetings and protests across a wide range of issues. Sudhir was unwavering in his commitment to Maoism, upholding the torch of B.R. Ambedkar, and resisting Brahmanical fascism. He sought to bridge the philosophies of Marxism and Ambedkarism. With boundless energy, he waved the banner of liberation, becoming the backbone of the revolutionary democratic centre in Mumbai and Maharashtra. He dedicated himself ...

Why crucifixion is a comprehensive message of political journey for the liberation of the oppressed

By Vijayan MJ  Passion week is that time of the year when Christians all over the world remind themselves about the sufferings, anguish, pain and the bloody crucifixion that Jesus Christ took on himself, as part of his mission of emancipating the people and establishing the kingdom of god. The crucifixion was not just a great symbolism of the personal sacrifice of one person, but it was a comprehensive messaging of a political journey for the liberation of the oppressed; one filled with struggle, militancy, celebration of life, rejection of temptations, betrayals, grief, the long-walk with the cross, crucifixion and ultimately resurrection as a symbol of victory over the oppressors and evil. 

CPM’s evaluation of BJP reflects its political character and its reluctance to take on battle against neo-fascism

By Harsh Thakor*  A controversial debate has emerged in the revolutionary camp regarding the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s categorization of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Many Communists criticize the CPM’s reluctance to label the BJP as a fascist party and India as a fascist state. Various factors must be considered to arrive at an accurate assessment. Understanding the original meaning and historical development of fascism is essential, as well as analyzing how it manifests in the present global and national context.

Akhilesh Yadav’s boycott of Dainik Jagran: A step towards accountability or political rhetoric?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat  Akhilesh Yadav has called for a total boycott of Dainik Jagran, a newspaper owned by the Gupta family. He also declared that the Samajwadi Party will no longer participate in any panel discussions organized by a media channel allegedly controlled by the family or relatives of the omnipresent Rajiv Shukla. Akhilesh Yadav and the Samajwadi Party are well aware that Dainik Jagran has long been antagonistic to Dalit-Bahujan interests. The newspaper represents a Bania-Brahmin corporate and ideological enterprise.

Implications of deaths of Maoist leaders G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya in Chhattisgarh

By Harsh Thakor*  In the wake of recent security operations in southern Chhattisgarh, two senior Maoist leaders, G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya, were killed. These operations, which took place amidst a historically significant Maoist presence, resulted in the deaths of 31 individuals on March 20th and 16 more three days prior.