Skip to main content

How political identity of J&K has been 'systematically usurped' by rightist politics

Omar Abdullah, then and now
By Sandeep Pandey*, Rajendran Narayanan**
The decision on August 5, 2019 to abrogate Articles 370 and 35A and division and downgrading of State of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) into two Union Territories J&K and Ladakh was taken in a most undemocratic manner without consulting a single person of J&K. The State Assembly is not in existence for 18 months now.
There were four occasions when a new government could have been formed but the Union Government did not let it happen. Immediately after the fall of Bhartiya Janata Party-People’s Democractic Party coalition government, PDP, National Conference and Congress Party were willing to come together to form a government.
Governor Satyapal Malik imposed Governor’s rule as a preemptive measure. At the expiry of the six month period elections should have been held. But instead President’s rule was imposed. When the General Elections were being held it was expected the elections to J&K Assembly will also be held along with four other states. But that did not happen.
Finally, the President’s rule was extended for a second six month term in July 2019, instead of holding the elections. In retrospect in appears that it was deliberate ploy. Because if a State Assembly had been in place in J&K then the decisions taken by Union Government would have to have been approved by the Assembly first.
The Governor substituted in lieu of the State Government and recommended amendment in Article 370. However, considering that the Governor was a man from outside the State handpicked by the Union Government, the entire process was a clever manipulation to prevent the participation of any citizen of J&K in the important decision taken about the State.
Most shockingly Dr Farooq Abdullah, a Member of Paliament from J&K, was not allowed to attend the Parliament and the Home Minister lied to the nation that Dr Abdullah was unwell and that he couldn’t bring him to Parliament at gun point. Fact is, Dr Abdullah was under house arrest and police would not let him go out. And that too without any written order.
It was only when the South Indian politician Vaiko filed a habeas corpus in September 2019 for Dr Farooq Abdullah, as he wanted to invite him to an event in Tamil Nadu, that Public Safety Act was invoked against him to prevent him from being released by a Court order.
Omar Abdullah and Mehbooba Mufti, both former Chief Ministers, also continue to be under illegal detention at their homes like a number of other political leaders, including Shah Faesal, who had recently floated a Party.
As if this humiliation was not enough, the Prime Minister and Home Minister have accused three political families of looting the State. While this may be true it is not as if corruption is a J&K specific phenomenon. Several other CMs like Laloo Prasad Yadav, Om Prakash Chautala, Jayalalitha, Madhu Koda and Shibu Soren were jailed or are in jail on corruption charges. 
Even BJP CM B Yeddyurappa has faced corruption charges and at one time was discredited to the extent that BJP distanced itself from him. It appears that this again is a conspiracy to discredit the political leadership of J&K.
Now we hear that the government is planning to release Abdullahs provided they quite politics for a while and possibly move abroad. This is really strange. If they have committed any crime they should be tried and sent to jail like some of the other politicians in country. But removing politicians from the scene altogether who can possibly help revival of electoral politics in state is sinister.
In the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution the Local Government is a subject under the State List, yet Union Government went ahead and got Block Development Council elections conducted which was boycotted by the two major Parties of J&K as well as the Congress Party. This presents a dangerous scenario. The BJP-RSS has been building a ‘One Nation, One Constitution, One Language’ narrative and they may lead us to a situation of One Party rule.
BJP was the only party contesting the Block level elections in J&K. This will be the end of democracy in India. Indian democracy has thrived on a multi-Party system so far. The opposition Parties play an important role of check and balance and also offer an alternative to the people in the next elections if the people are not happy with the ruling Party.
It is strange that while BJP has implemented the longtime political agenda of RSS to abrogate Article 370, it is preventing other political parties to carry out their political activities. Even the Supreme Court, when it has allowed any politician from outside to visit J&K, has put a condition that politicians should not carry out political activities. This is really strange. If the political parties are prevented from carrying out political activities, what else are they supposed to do?
It is strange that the government is arranging trips of foreign envoys to J&K while not allowing own MPs to visit.
With the downgrading of State status to Union Territories, the bureaucracy and military establishment is clearly dominating the politics and the officials don’t feel accountable to the people as a people’s representative would have felt.
Hence in all possible ways the BJP government in power in Delhi is making sure that there is no political alternative in J&K or any voice demanding democratic rights for people. It wants a police or military state in J&K and forces everybody to accept its point of view.
Attempt should be made for a dialogue with Pakistan to reunite the two portions of J&K. A joint management of the united J&K should be worked out
We have been told by BJP politicians and RSS leaders in the past five months that people in J&K are happy with the decision taken by Union Government on 5 August. The reality is quite the opposite. Government says J&K has been integrated with India. Whereas people of J&K feel that their alienation is now complete.
It is quite a politically hopeless situation in J&K with no revival of political process in sight. The fundamental rights guaranteed by the Article 19 of Constitution of freedom of expression, to assemble peacably, to form associations or to move freely, which are basic requirement for carrying out any political activity in a democracy or for the existence of democracy itself, have been throttled.
The Union Government goes on the claim that normalcy has been restored in J&K, yet heavy military presence and restriction on fundamental rights, as we directly experienced during our Jammu to Srinagar march organised during November 26 to December 1, 2019, do not augur well for the future of J&K. The Union Government does not even seem to have a roadmap to create a situation of normalcy. The most important ingredient of normalcy - dialogue - is something in which the BJP and RSS don’t believe.
The restriction on fundamental rights facilitated by heavy presence of security forces -which is not a pleasant situation for them either - and democracy cannot go hand in hand. The Union Government must consider phased withdrawal of the Army and lifting of restrictions on fundamental rights for revival of political process.
There could be turmoil and the situation may turn very messy, but people’s will cannot be suppressed for very long if democracy is to survive. There should be State Assembly elections of the undivided J&K held as soon as possible and if the Union Government claims that people of J&K are agreeable to the decisions taken by it then the decisions should be approved by the Assembly, only then the decisions can be considered legitimate.
Otherwise, the situation existing prior to that must be restored and, in fact, the agreement of Government of India with the ruler of J&K at the time of accession must be honoured. In addition an attempt should be made after a dialogue with Government of Pakistan to reunite the two portions of J&K, currently with Indian and Pakistan, and a joint management of the united J&K should be worked out by the two countries.
Only such a solution will end the enmity of India and Pakistan too and will make the people of J&K happy. As things stand, numerous people in J&K feel that they have become a scapegoat for political gains of ruling elites in India and Pakistan.
---
*Social and political activist, **teaches at Azim Premji University

Comments

TRENDING

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी: जल जीवन मिशन के लक्ष्य को पाने समन्वित प्रयास जरूरी

- राज कुमार सिन्हा*  जल संसाधन से जुड़ी स्थायी समिति ने वर्तमान लोकसभा सत्र में पेश रिपोर्ट में बताया है कि "नल से जल" मिशन में राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी साबित हुए हैं। जबकि देश के 11 राज्यों में शत-प्रतिशत ग्रामीणों को नल से जल आपूर्ति शुरू कर दी गई है। रिपोर्ट में समिति ने केंद्र सरकार को सिफारिश की है कि मिशन पुरा करने में राज्य सरकारों की समस्याओं पर गौर किया जाए। 

Censor Board's bullying delays 'Phule': A blow to India's democratic spirit

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  A film based on the life and legacy of Jyotiba Phule and Savitribai Phule was expected to release today. Instead, its release has been pushed to the last week of April. The reason? Protests by self-proclaimed guardians of caste pride—certain Brahmin groups—and forced edits demanded by a thoroughly discredited Censor Board.

CASR urges immediate halt to Operation Kagaar, calls for peace talks with Maoists

By A Representative   The Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), a collective of over 40 civil society organizations, has issued a press statement demanding an immediate end to "Operation Kagaar" and alleged state-led killings of Maoist rebels and indigenous people in central India. The group also called on the central government to create a conducive environment for initiating peace talks with the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist).

Maoist call for peace talks: A democratic opening amidst state repression?

By Harsh Thakor*  The readiness of the CPI (Maoist), a banned organisation, for peace talks is seen as signifying a democratic gesture that should be welcomed by all who uphold democratic values. The ongoing conflict under ‘Operation Kagaar’ in Central India represents a clash between alleged state aggression and self-defence by oppressed communities. Critics argue that the Indian government has violated constitutional principles by promoting corporate expansion in Adivasi regions under the pretext of development, endangering the lives and livelihoods of local populations.

Incarcerated for 2,424 days, Sudhir Dhawale combines Ambedkarism with Marxism

By Harsh Thakor   One of those who faced incarceration both under Congress and BJP rule, Sudhir Dhawale was arrested on June 6, 2018, one of the first six among the 16 people held in what became known as the Elgar Parishad case. After spending 2,424 days in incarceration, he became the ninth to be released from jail—alongside Rona Wilson, who walked free with him on January 24. The Bombay High Court granted them bail, citing the prolonged imprisonment without trial as a key factor. I will always remember the moments we spent together in Mumbai between 1998 and 2006, during public meetings and protests across a wide range of issues. Sudhir was unwavering in his commitment to Maoism, upholding the torch of B.R. Ambedkar, and resisting Brahmanical fascism. He sought to bridge the philosophies of Marxism and Ambedkarism. With boundless energy, he waved the banner of liberation, becoming the backbone of the revolutionary democratic centre in Mumbai and Maharashtra. He dedicated himself ...

Why crucifixion is a comprehensive message of political journey for the liberation of the oppressed

By Vijayan MJ  Passion week is that time of the year when Christians all over the world remind themselves about the sufferings, anguish, pain and the bloody crucifixion that Jesus Christ took on himself, as part of his mission of emancipating the people and establishing the kingdom of god. The crucifixion was not just a great symbolism of the personal sacrifice of one person, but it was a comprehensive messaging of a political journey for the liberation of the oppressed; one filled with struggle, militancy, celebration of life, rejection of temptations, betrayals, grief, the long-walk with the cross, crucifixion and ultimately resurrection as a symbol of victory over the oppressors and evil. 

How Mumbai University crumbles: Not just its buildings

By Rosamma Thomas*  In recent days, the news from the University of Mumbai has been far from inspiring – clumps of plaster have fallen off the ceiling at the CD Deshmukh Bhavan, and it was good fortune that no one was injured; creepy crawlies were found in the water dispenser that students use to collect drinking water, and timely warning videos circulated by vigilant students have kept people safe so far.

CPM’s evaluation of BJP reflects its political character and its reluctance to take on battle against neo-fascism

By Harsh Thakor*  A controversial debate has emerged in the revolutionary camp regarding the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s categorization of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Many Communists criticize the CPM’s reluctance to label the BJP as a fascist party and India as a fascist state. Various factors must be considered to arrive at an accurate assessment. Understanding the original meaning and historical development of fascism is essential, as well as analyzing how it manifests in the present global and national context.

Akhilesh Yadav’s boycott of Dainik Jagran: A step towards accountability or political rhetoric?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat  Akhilesh Yadav has called for a total boycott of Dainik Jagran, a newspaper owned by the Gupta family. He also declared that the Samajwadi Party will no longer participate in any panel discussions organized by a media channel allegedly controlled by the family or relatives of the omnipresent Rajiv Shukla. Akhilesh Yadav and the Samajwadi Party are well aware that Dainik Jagran has long been antagonistic to Dalit-Bahujan interests. The newspaper represents a Bania-Brahmin corporate and ideological enterprise.