Skip to main content

China-led, India-supported AIIB funding hyper-inflated infra projects, promoting crony capitalism: Mumbai meet

Medha Patkar addressing the convention
By A Representative
A civil society-sponsored convention, concluded ahead of the high-profile AIIB (Asian Infrastructure and Investment Bank) board meet, to take place on June 25-26 in Mumbai, has sharply criticized the "China-led" international financial institution (IFI), insisting, it "rejects" AIIB claim that it "serves as a healthy and essential alternative to undemocratic IFIs such as the World Bank, Asian Development Bank and International Finance Corporation which are controlled by western powers."
Held in Mumbai on June 21-23, a resolution adopted at the end of the convention said, "The design and structure of the $100 billion AIIB functions equally undemocratically. What is worse, it invests in projects without in any manner complying with necessary environmental and social safeguards. In the process, AIIB is doling out billions of dollars of loans to critical sectors such as energy, road building and urbanization causing extensive negative environmental and social impacts."
The resolution noted. "As a result, India, the largest recipient of AIIB loans, has become a site for corporate land grab resulting in massive loss of livelihoods and displacement of rural and urban communities, the prime example being that of the Amravati capital city which is being developed on flood plains and 50,000 acres of fertile agricultural land forcibly acquired from farmers and workers."
Participated by over 1,000 delegates from 200 organizations, the convention was attended by senior activists, academics and financial analysists including Medha Patkar, economist Prof Arun Kumar, Praful Samantara, financial analyst Sucheta Dalal, activists Ulka Mahajan, Roma, Shaktiman Ghosh, Leo Colaco, T Peter, Dr Sunilam, Ram Wangkheirakpam, Leo Saldanha, Rajendra Ravi, Gabriele Dietrich, among others.
Prof Arun Kumar
Taking directly on Prime Minister Narendra Modi for "the IFI promoted development model without any public debate", and terming it "Modani model", the resolution said, it is "pushing big and unnecessary hyper-inflated infrastructure projects like industrial corridors, Bharatmala, Sagarmala, bullet trains, smart cities and others" -- all this "at the cost of basic necessities" of the people such as food, housing and clothing.
"This model is designed to strengthen the hegemony of capital, maximisation of profit and promotion of crony capitalism. The model is best described as: free hand to corporations and loot of labour, farmers, workers and adivasis. We reject this model and the governments and political parties who promote it. They have lost the moral and political legitimacy to rule", the resolution said.
It said, "The Government of India is hosting the AIIB AGM at a time when the Indian economy is reeling under multiple crises which are largely an outcome of a series of reckless and draconian actions of the administration led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The colossal disaster of demonetisation (November 2016), which was followed by an ill-planned unveiling of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime (2017), has resulted in a terrible attack on the fragile economic status of the poor, devastating millions of livelihoods in farming, fisher and pastoral communities as well as seriously damaging the entrepreneurship of small and medium enterprises and the unorganised sector."
It added, "These policies build on the failed neoliberal reforms and the agenda of liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation which began in 1991 at the behest of the IMF. The working systems of the Reserve Bank of India and other financial regulatory institutions, as well as public sector banks, have been undermined by the constant interference from the Finance Ministry of India, endangering the resilience of the country's financial architecture which has withstood multiple economic and financial crises over time."
"As a result, billions of dollars of bad debt remains unrecovered. Their volume is mounting. Some of India’s richest men, and the massive and powerful corporations they lead, are major debtors to India’s banks. Because of their deep access to high political power, their bad loans and Non-Performing Assets are being systematically written off without attaching their personal assets or taking legal action to tackle such serious economic violations", it said.
Demanding that the "loans, debts and tax benefits given to corporations, amounting to Rs 48 lakh crore approximately, be recovered, and be used to provide education, health and employment for all and to eliminate hunger and poverty", the resolution said, "This should also be used for waiving the farm loans of millions of marginal farmers, workers, adivasis and small enterprises, and to help them rebuild the economy."

Comments

Uma saidâ€Ķ
Say what you like, nobody is listening. This is the only way to get the photographs and name in th e media world-wide

TRENDING

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

āΰāĪūāΜāĪļāĨāĪĨāĪūāĪĻ, āĪŪāΧāĨāĪŊāĪŠāĨāΰāĪĶāĨ‡āĪķ, āĪŠāĪķāĨāΚāĪŋāĪŪ āĪŽāĪ‚āĪ—āĪūāĪē, āĪāĪūāΰāĪ–āĪ‚āĪĄ āĪ”āΰ āĪ•āĨ‡āΰāĪē āĪŦāĪŋāĪļāĪĄāĨāĪĄāĨ€: āΜāĪē āΜāĨ€āĪĩāĪĻ āĪŪāĪŋāĪķāĪĻ āĪ•āĨ‡ āĪēāĪ•āĨāĪ·āĨāĪŊ āĪ•āĨ‹ āĪŠāĪūāĪĻāĨ‡ āĪļāĪŪāĪĻāĨāĪĩāĪŋāĪĪ āĪŠāĨāΰāĪŊāĪūāĪļ āΜāΰāĨ‚āΰāĨ€

- āΰāĪūāΜ āĪ•āĨāĪŪāĪūāΰ āĪļāĪŋāĪĻāĨāĪđāĪū*  āΜāĪē āĪļāĪ‚āĪļāĪūāΧāĪĻ āĪļāĨ‡ āΜāĨāĪĄāĪžāĨ€ āĪļāĨāĪĨāĪūāĪŊāĨ€ āĪļāĪŪāĪŋāĪĪāĪŋ āĪĻāĨ‡ āĪĩāΰāĨāĪĪāĪŪāĪūāĪĻ āĪēāĨ‹āĪ•āĪļāĪ­āĪū āĪļāĪĪāĨāΰ āĪŪāĨ‡āĪ‚ āĪŠāĨ‡āĪķ āΰāĪŋāĪŠāĨ‹āΰāĨāΟ āĪŪāĨ‡āĪ‚ āĪŽāĪĪāĪūāĪŊāĪū āĪđāĨˆ āĪ•āĪŋ "āĪĻāĪē āĪļāĨ‡ āΜāĪē" āĪŪāĪŋāĪķāĪĻ āĪŪāĨ‡āĪ‚ āΰāĪūāΜāĪļāĨāĪĨāĪūāĪĻ, āĪŪāΧāĨāĪŊāĪŠāĨāΰāĪĶāĨ‡āĪķ, āĪŠāĪķāĨāΚāĪŋāĪŪ āĪŽāĪ‚āĪ—āĪūāĪē, āĪāĪūāΰāĪ–āĪ‚āĪĄ āĪ”āΰ āĪ•āĨ‡āΰāĪē āĪŦāĪŋāĪļāĪĄāĨāĪĄāĨ€ āĪļāĪūāĪŽāĪŋāĪĪ āĪđāĨāĪ āĪđāĨˆāĪ‚āĨĪ āΜāĪŽāĪ•āĪŋ āĪĶāĨ‡āĪķ āĪ•āĨ‡ 11 āΰāĪūāΜāĨāĪŊāĨ‹āĪ‚ āĪŪāĨ‡āĪ‚ āĪķāĪĪ-āĪŠāĨāΰāĪĪāĪŋāĪķāĪĪ āĪ—āĨāΰāĪūāĪŪāĨ€āĪĢāĨ‹āĪ‚ āĪ•āĨ‹ āĪĻāĪē āĪļāĨ‡ āΜāĪē āΆāĪŠāĨ‚āΰāĨāĪĪāĪŋ āĪķāĨāΰāĨ‚ āĪ•āΰ āĪĶāĨ€ āĪ—āΈ āĪđāĨˆāĨĪ āΰāĪŋāĪŠāĨ‹āΰāĨāΟ āĪŪāĨ‡āĪ‚ āĪļāĪŪāĪŋāĪĪāĪŋ āĪĻāĨ‡ āĪ•āĨ‡āĪ‚āĪĶāĨāΰ āĪļāΰāĪ•āĪūāΰ āĪ•āĨ‹ āĪļāĪŋāĪŦāĪūāΰāĪŋāĪķ āĪ•āĨ€ āĪđāĨˆ āĪ•āĪŋ āĪŪāĪŋāĪķāĪĻ āĪŠāĨāΰāĪū āĪ•āΰāĪĻāĨ‡ āĪŪāĨ‡āĪ‚ āΰāĪūāΜāĨāĪŊ āĪļāΰāĪ•āĪūāΰāĨ‹āĪ‚ āĪ•āĨ€ āĪļāĪŪāĪļāĨāĪŊāĪūāĪ“āĪ‚ āĪŠāΰ āĪ—āĨŒāΰ āĪ•āĪŋāĪŊāĪū āΜāĪūāĪāĨĪ 

Censor Board's bullying delays 'Phule': A blow to India's democratic spirit

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  A film based on the life and legacy of Jyotiba Phule and Savitribai Phule was expected to release today. Instead, its release has been pushed to the last week of April. The reason? Protests by self-proclaimed guardians of caste pride—certain Brahmin groups—and forced edits demanded by a thoroughly discredited Censor Board.

PUCL files complaint with SC against Gujarat police, municipal authorities for 'unlawful' demolitions, custodial 'violence'

By A Representative   The People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has lodged a formal complaint with the Chief Justice of India, urging the Supreme Court to initiate suo-moto contempt proceedings against the police and municipal authorities in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The complaint alleges that these officials have engaged in unlawful demolitions and custodial violence, in direct violation of a Supreme Court order issued in November 2024.

Incarcerated for 2,424 days, Sudhir Dhawale combines Ambedkarism with Marxism

By Harsh Thakor   One of those who faced incarceration both under Congress and BJP rule, Sudhir Dhawale was arrested on June 6, 2018, one of the first six among the 16 people held in what became known as the Elgar Parishad case. After spending 2,424 days in incarceration, he became the ninth to be released from jail—alongside Rona Wilson, who walked free with him on January 24. The Bombay High Court granted them bail, citing the prolonged imprisonment without trial as a key factor. I will always remember the moments we spent together in Mumbai between 1998 and 2006, during public meetings and protests across a wide range of issues. Sudhir was unwavering in his commitment to Maoism, upholding the torch of B.R. Ambedkar, and resisting Brahmanical fascism. He sought to bridge the philosophies of Marxism and Ambedkarism. With boundless energy, he waved the banner of liberation, becoming the backbone of the revolutionary democratic centre in Mumbai and Maharashtra. He dedicated himself ...

Aurangzeb’s last will recorded by his Maulvi: Allah shouldn't make anyone emperor

By Mohan Guruswamy  Aurangzeb’s grave is a simple slab open to the sky lying along the roadside at Khuldabad near Aurangabad. I once stopped by to marvel at the tomb of an Emperor of India whose empire was as large as Ashoka the Great's. It was only post 1857 when Victoria's domain exceeded this. The epitaph reads: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast." (The rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave) The modest tomb of Aurangzeb is perhaps the least recognised legacies of the Mughal Emperor who ruled the land for fifty eventful years. He was not a builder having expended his long tenure in war and conquest. Towards the end of his reign and life, he realised the futility of it all. He wrote: "Allah should not make anyone an emperor. The most unfortunate person is he who becomes one." Aurangzeb’s last will was re...

Why crucifixion is a comprehensive message of political journey for the liberation of the oppressed

By Vijayan MJ  Passion week is that time of the year when Christians all over the world remind themselves about the sufferings, anguish, pain and the bloody crucifixion that Jesus Christ took on himself, as part of his mission of emancipating the people and establishing the kingdom of god. The crucifixion was not just a great symbolism of the personal sacrifice of one person, but it was a comprehensive messaging of a political journey for the liberation of the oppressed; one filled with struggle, militancy, celebration of life, rejection of temptations, betrayals, grief, the long-walk with the cross, crucifixion and ultimately resurrection as a symbol of victory over the oppressors and evil. 

CPM’s evaluation of BJP reflects its political character and its reluctance to take on battle against neo-fascism

By Harsh Thakor*  A controversial debate has emerged in the revolutionary camp regarding the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s categorization of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Many Communists criticize the CPM’s reluctance to label the BJP as a fascist party and India as a fascist state. Various factors must be considered to arrive at an accurate assessment. Understanding the original meaning and historical development of fascism is essential, as well as analyzing how it manifests in the present global and national context.

Akhilesh Yadav’s boycott of Dainik Jagran: A step towards accountability or political rhetoric?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat  Akhilesh Yadav has called for a total boycott of Dainik Jagran, a newspaper owned by the Gupta family. He also declared that the Samajwadi Party will no longer participate in any panel discussions organized by a media channel allegedly controlled by the family or relatives of the omnipresent Rajiv Shukla. Akhilesh Yadav and the Samajwadi Party are well aware that Dainik Jagran has long been antagonistic to Dalit-Bahujan interests. The newspaper represents a Bania-Brahmin corporate and ideological enterprise.

Maoist call for peace talks: A democratic opening amidst state repression?

By Harsh Thakor*  The readiness of the CPI (Maoist), a banned organisation, for peace talks is seen as signifying a democratic gesture that should be welcomed by all who uphold democratic values. The ongoing conflict under ‘Operation Kagaar’ in Central India represents a clash between alleged state aggression and self-defence by oppressed communities. Critics argue that the Indian government has violated constitutional principles by promoting corporate expansion in Adivasi regions under the pretext of development, endangering the lives and livelihoods of local populations.