PUCL to challenge appointment of BJP politician as NHRC member in Supreme Court, calls move "sinister"
By A Representative
PeopleтАЩs Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL), IndiaтАЩs premier human rights organization, has threatened to approach the Supreme Court against the appointment of BJP vice president Avinash Rai Khanna as a member of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), for a post that was тАЬkept vacantтАЭ for the last two years.
In a statement signed by Prof Prabhakar Sinha, national president, and Dr V Suresh, national general Secretary, PUCL has recalls that, previously, during the UPA regime (in 2005), when a retired police officer was appointed as a member of the NHRC, it was questioned by PUCL before the Supreme Court.
тАЬIf the present decision to nominate Khanna is not withdrawn, the PUCL will be тАЬconstrained to take it up in the Apex CourtтАЭ, PUCL says, adding, it is тАЬshocked and surprised how the opposition members on the selection panel agreed to the appointment of Khanna, defeating the principle of checks and balances provided in the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.тАЭ
Calling it a тАЬsinister attemptтАЭ by the present BJP-led NDA government to fill тАЬcrucial posts in institutions tasked with the responsibility to critically review, oversee, monitor or examine complaints regarding the functioning of the government , with persons who are unsuitable for the postтАЭ, PUCL says, the decision will тАЬharm the credibility, impartiality and effectiveness of NHRCтАЭ.
Pointing out that NHRC has in the past тАЬtaken up issues of human rights abuses by governmental functionaries, suo-moto or on the basis of complaintsтАЭ, PUCL says, тАЬThe appointment of a politician of the ruling party compromises its independence, objectivity and credibility.тАЭ
Saying that the decision тАЬcreates a conflict of interestтАЭ, PUCL notes, тАЬSection 3 (2) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 under which the NHRC is formed and constituted, states that apart from former Judges of the Supreme or High Courts, two other members will be тАШappointed from amongst persons having knowledge of, or practical experience in, matters relating to human rightsтАЩ.тАЭ
тАЬIt is clear that Khanna does not have the relevant experience in the field of human rightsтАЭ, PUCL says, adding, he has been тАЬassociated with the BJP for the last several decades and was an active member of ABVP, RSS during student life, as per his biographical sketch on the Lok Sabha website.тАЭ
Further, it adds, Khanna was тАЬpreviously made a member of the Punjab State Human Rights Commission but resigned when he was nominated to the Rajya Sabha. Thus, PUCL believes that the present decision is also a move to adjust and reward a senior member of the ruling party with a government post by treating crucial posts as largesse.тАЭ
тАЬThe principle of neutrality of NHRC members is particularly crucial and important for many times the NHRC is called upon to investigate mass human rights abuses by security forces with allegations of complicity of the political executiveтАЭ, says PUCL.
In the face of latest development, PUCL says, citizens should тАЬcontinuously remain vigilant and oppose all anti-democratic and anti-human rights actions and decisions of the government so that institutions such as NHRC retain their independence, credibility, effectiveness and keep holding the government of the day accountable for any human rights abuses.тАЭ
PeopleтАЩs Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL), IndiaтАЩs premier human rights organization, has threatened to approach the Supreme Court against the appointment of BJP vice president Avinash Rai Khanna as a member of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), for a post that was тАЬkept vacantтАЭ for the last two years.
In a statement signed by Prof Prabhakar Sinha, national president, and Dr V Suresh, national general Secretary, PUCL has recalls that, previously, during the UPA regime (in 2005), when a retired police officer was appointed as a member of the NHRC, it was questioned by PUCL before the Supreme Court.
тАЬIf the present decision to nominate Khanna is not withdrawn, the PUCL will be тАЬconstrained to take it up in the Apex CourtтАЭ, PUCL says, adding, it is тАЬshocked and surprised how the opposition members on the selection panel agreed to the appointment of Khanna, defeating the principle of checks and balances provided in the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.тАЭ
Calling it a тАЬsinister attemptтАЭ by the present BJP-led NDA government to fill тАЬcrucial posts in institutions tasked with the responsibility to critically review, oversee, monitor or examine complaints regarding the functioning of the government , with persons who are unsuitable for the postтАЭ, PUCL says, the decision will тАЬharm the credibility, impartiality and effectiveness of NHRCтАЭ.
Pointing out that NHRC has in the past тАЬtaken up issues of human rights abuses by governmental functionaries, suo-moto or on the basis of complaintsтАЭ, PUCL says, тАЬThe appointment of a politician of the ruling party compromises its independence, objectivity and credibility.тАЭ
Saying that the decision тАЬcreates a conflict of interestтАЭ, PUCL notes, тАЬSection 3 (2) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 under which the NHRC is formed and constituted, states that apart from former Judges of the Supreme or High Courts, two other members will be тАШappointed from amongst persons having knowledge of, or practical experience in, matters relating to human rightsтАЩ.тАЭ
тАЬIt is clear that Khanna does not have the relevant experience in the field of human rightsтАЭ, PUCL says, adding, he has been тАЬassociated with the BJP for the last several decades and was an active member of ABVP, RSS during student life, as per his biographical sketch on the Lok Sabha website.тАЭ
Further, it adds, Khanna was тАЬpreviously made a member of the Punjab State Human Rights Commission but resigned when he was nominated to the Rajya Sabha. Thus, PUCL believes that the present decision is also a move to adjust and reward a senior member of the ruling party with a government post by treating crucial posts as largesse.тАЭ
тАЬThe principle of neutrality of NHRC members is particularly crucial and important for many times the NHRC is called upon to investigate mass human rights abuses by security forces with allegations of complicity of the political executiveтАЭ, says PUCL.
In the face of latest development, PUCL says, citizens should тАЬcontinuously remain vigilant and oppose all anti-democratic and anti-human rights actions and decisions of the government so that institutions such as NHRC retain their independence, credibility, effectiveness and keep holding the government of the day accountable for any human rights abuses.тАЭ
Comments