Skip to main content

Modi adviser Doval in interview he doesn't "remember" giving: Pathankot attack was intelligence failure, but...

By A Representative
Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s national security adviser Ajit Doval, widely publicized as 007 James Bond of India, has run into yet another controversy following the Pathankot terror attack: After giving an interview to a top Indian media house, where he attacked the media once again, he has sought to deny he ever gave the interview.
In an exclusive interview to the Hindi daily Divya Bhaskar’s online site, http://www.bhaskar.com/, Doval said that one shouldn’t say “India’s security is weak” or that it was a “matter of providence that the terrorists were in a limited area”. The reason, he suggested, is not that this is may not be true, but that this kind of view would “demoralize” the armed forces.
Soon after the interview, @ANI_news quoted Doval as saying that “I do not remember giving any such interview”. This led Divya Bhaskar to release the audio clip of the interview to prove that the interview, was indeed given. Meanwhile, the top Modi man became a matter of ridicule. Senior journalist Shivam Vij ‏@DilliDurAst tweeted if “India's NSA now has memory problems”.
Doval said in the “interview” that, in fact, for the sake of “encouraging” the armed forces, the “effort should have been to point towards how the six terrorist fidayeen, despite entering into the territory, failed to damage the Air Force base because of efforts” and that “after collecting intelligence, we sent the forces on time and the Air Force base.”
Refusing to deny the allegations of failure, he said, this kind of interpretation was needed so as to “motivate both the country and our soldiers”, adding, “We should learn this from France. Following the attack in France, no leader spoke out in opposition. The media also did not show the dead bodies for increasing its TRP, even though it was also an complete intelligence failure.”
Doval's letter to Cabinet Secretary seeking action against NDTV
“If agencies had not responded late, a lot could have been done in order to save the situation. Yet, there was no negative comment to demoralize the effort”, Doval asserted, referring to the Paris terror attack.
Answering the question on how he interpreted the “loss suffered” due to the intelligence failure, Doval replied, “If there is a war, and one is in the boxing ring, whether you like it not, you will receive some blows.”
Asked what he had to say about adverse comments on his “personal and professional life”, Doval said, “Earlier, only 1-2 per cent of whatever has been noted about me in the media is true. Besides, I do not have time to react to media speculations.”
The most controversial part of the interview, which attracted immediate large coverage on news channels, of course, was where he declared that, following the Pathankot terror attack, the “Indo-Pak secretary level meeting has been cancelled”, and that there would not be “any peace talks” till Pakistan does not take action against those responsible for the attack and India is not “satisfied by its (Pakistan’s) action.”
This is not for the first time that Doval has sought to target media. He is known to be behind efforts to brand NDTV anti-national in a letter to the Cabinet Secretary in October 2014, where he said, “It has been observed that in the last few years, it has become a regular practice, particularly in the media, to violate secrecy laws with impunity. Firm action need to be taken in such cases that undermine the national security of the country.”
Especially referring to the NDTV report dated August 20, 2014, which carried a “report about INS Arihand Nuclear Sabmarine and associated VLF communication”, even as showing images of Prime Minister on INS Arihant at DRDO Award function on the same day, Doval said, the information was an “offense under the Official Secrets Act.”

Comments

TRENDING

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

āΰāĪūāΜāĪļāĨāĪĨāĪūāĪĻ, āĪŪāΧāĨāĪŊāĪŠāĨāΰāĪĶāĨ‡āĪķ, āĪŠāĪķāĨāΚāĪŋāĪŪ āĪŽāĪ‚āĪ—āĪūāĪē, āĪāĪūāΰāĪ–āĪ‚āĪĄ āĪ”āΰ āĪ•āĨ‡āΰāĪē āĪŦāĪŋāĪļāĪĄāĨāĪĄāĨ€: āΜāĪē āΜāĨ€āĪĩāĪĻ āĪŪāĪŋāĪķāĪĻ āĪ•āĨ‡ āĪēāĪ•āĨāĪ·āĨāĪŊ āĪ•āĨ‹ āĪŠāĪūāĪĻāĨ‡ āĪļāĪŪāĪĻāĨāĪĩāĪŋāĪĪ āĪŠāĨāΰāĪŊāĪūāĪļ āΜāΰāĨ‚āΰāĨ€

- āΰāĪūāΜ āĪ•āĨāĪŪāĪūāΰ āĪļāĪŋāĪĻāĨāĪđāĪū*  āΜāĪē āĪļāĪ‚āĪļāĪūāΧāĪĻ āĪļāĨ‡ āΜāĨāĪĄāĪžāĨ€ āĪļāĨāĪĨāĪūāĪŊāĨ€ āĪļāĪŪāĪŋāĪĪāĪŋ āĪĻāĨ‡ āĪĩāΰāĨāĪĪāĪŪāĪūāĪĻ āĪēāĨ‹āĪ•āĪļāĪ­āĪū āĪļāĪĪāĨāΰ āĪŪāĨ‡āĪ‚ āĪŠāĨ‡āĪķ āΰāĪŋāĪŠāĨ‹āΰāĨāΟ āĪŪāĨ‡āĪ‚ āĪŽāĪĪāĪūāĪŊāĪū āĪđāĨˆ āĪ•āĪŋ "āĪĻāĪē āĪļāĨ‡ āΜāĪē" āĪŪāĪŋāĪķāĪĻ āĪŪāĨ‡āĪ‚ āΰāĪūāΜāĪļāĨāĪĨāĪūāĪĻ, āĪŪāΧāĨāĪŊāĪŠāĨāΰāĪĶāĨ‡āĪķ, āĪŠāĪķāĨāΚāĪŋāĪŪ āĪŽāĪ‚āĪ—āĪūāĪē, āĪāĪūāΰāĪ–āĪ‚āĪĄ āĪ”āΰ āĪ•āĨ‡āΰāĪē āĪŦāĪŋāĪļāĪĄāĨāĪĄāĨ€ āĪļāĪūāĪŽāĪŋāĪĪ āĪđāĨāĪ āĪđāĨˆāĪ‚āĨĪ āΜāĪŽāĪ•āĪŋ āĪĶāĨ‡āĪķ āĪ•āĨ‡ 11 āΰāĪūāΜāĨāĪŊāĨ‹āĪ‚ āĪŪāĨ‡āĪ‚ āĪķāĪĪ-āĪŠāĨāΰāĪĪāĪŋāĪķāĪĪ āĪ—āĨāΰāĪūāĪŪāĨ€āĪĢāĨ‹āĪ‚ āĪ•āĨ‹ āĪĻāĪē āĪļāĨ‡ āΜāĪē āΆāĪŠāĨ‚āΰāĨāĪĪāĪŋ āĪķāĨāΰāĨ‚ āĪ•āΰ āĪĶāĨ€ āĪ—āΈ āĪđāĨˆāĨĪ āΰāĪŋāĪŠāĨ‹āΰāĨāΟ āĪŪāĨ‡āĪ‚ āĪļāĪŪāĪŋāĪĪāĪŋ āĪĻāĨ‡ āĪ•āĨ‡āĪ‚āĪĶāĨāΰ āĪļāΰāĪ•āĪūāΰ āĪ•āĨ‹ āĪļāĪŋāĪŦāĪūāΰāĪŋāĪķ āĪ•āĨ€ āĪđāĨˆ āĪ•āĪŋ āĪŪāĪŋāĪķāĪĻ āĪŠāĨāΰāĪū āĪ•āΰāĪĻāĨ‡ āĪŪāĨ‡āĪ‚ āΰāĪūāΜāĨāĪŊ āĪļāΰāĪ•āĪūāΰāĨ‹āĪ‚ āĪ•āĨ€ āĪļāĪŪāĪļāĨāĪŊāĪūāĪ“āĪ‚ āĪŠāΰ āĪ—āĨŒāΰ āĪ•āĪŋāĪŊāĪū āΜāĪūāĪāĨĪ 

Censor Board's bullying delays 'Phule': A blow to India's democratic spirit

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  A film based on the life and legacy of Jyotiba Phule and Savitribai Phule was expected to release today. Instead, its release has been pushed to the last week of April. The reason? Protests by self-proclaimed guardians of caste pride—certain Brahmin groups—and forced edits demanded by a thoroughly discredited Censor Board.

Maoist call for peace talks: A democratic opening amidst state repression?

By Harsh Thakor*  The readiness of the CPI (Maoist), a banned organisation, for peace talks is seen as signifying a democratic gesture that should be welcomed by all who uphold democratic values. The ongoing conflict under ‘Operation Kagaar’ in Central India represents a clash between alleged state aggression and self-defence by oppressed communities. Critics argue that the Indian government has violated constitutional principles by promoting corporate expansion in Adivasi regions under the pretext of development, endangering the lives and livelihoods of local populations.

CASR urges immediate halt to Operation Kagaar, calls for peace talks with Maoists

By A Representative   The Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), a collective of over 40 civil society organizations, has issued a press statement demanding an immediate end to "Operation Kagaar" and alleged state-led killings of Maoist rebels and indigenous people in central India. The group also called on the central government to create a conducive environment for initiating peace talks with the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist).

Incarcerated for 2,424 days, Sudhir Dhawale combines Ambedkarism with Marxism

By Harsh Thakor   One of those who faced incarceration both under Congress and BJP rule, Sudhir Dhawale was arrested on June 6, 2018, one of the first six among the 16 people held in what became known as the Elgar Parishad case. After spending 2,424 days in incarceration, he became the ninth to be released from jail—alongside Rona Wilson, who walked free with him on January 24. The Bombay High Court granted them bail, citing the prolonged imprisonment without trial as a key factor. I will always remember the moments we spent together in Mumbai between 1998 and 2006, during public meetings and protests across a wide range of issues. Sudhir was unwavering in his commitment to Maoism, upholding the torch of B.R. Ambedkar, and resisting Brahmanical fascism. He sought to bridge the philosophies of Marxism and Ambedkarism. With boundless energy, he waved the banner of liberation, becoming the backbone of the revolutionary democratic centre in Mumbai and Maharashtra. He dedicated himself ...

Why crucifixion is a comprehensive message of political journey for the liberation of the oppressed

By Vijayan MJ  Passion week is that time of the year when Christians all over the world remind themselves about the sufferings, anguish, pain and the bloody crucifixion that Jesus Christ took on himself, as part of his mission of emancipating the people and establishing the kingdom of god. The crucifixion was not just a great symbolism of the personal sacrifice of one person, but it was a comprehensive messaging of a political journey for the liberation of the oppressed; one filled with struggle, militancy, celebration of life, rejection of temptations, betrayals, grief, the long-walk with the cross, crucifixion and ultimately resurrection as a symbol of victory over the oppressors and evil. 

How Mumbai University crumbles: Not just its buildings

By Rosamma Thomas*  In recent days, the news from the University of Mumbai has been far from inspiring – clumps of plaster have fallen off the ceiling at the CD Deshmukh Bhavan, and it was good fortune that no one was injured; creepy crawlies were found in the water dispenser that students use to collect drinking water, and timely warning videos circulated by vigilant students have kept people safe so far.

CPM’s evaluation of BJP reflects its political character and its reluctance to take on battle against neo-fascism

By Harsh Thakor*  A controversial debate has emerged in the revolutionary camp regarding the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s categorization of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Many Communists criticize the CPM’s reluctance to label the BJP as a fascist party and India as a fascist state. Various factors must be considered to arrive at an accurate assessment. Understanding the original meaning and historical development of fascism is essential, as well as analyzing how it manifests in the present global and national context.

Akhilesh Yadav’s boycott of Dainik Jagran: A step towards accountability or political rhetoric?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat  Akhilesh Yadav has called for a total boycott of Dainik Jagran, a newspaper owned by the Gupta family. He also declared that the Samajwadi Party will no longer participate in any panel discussions organized by a media channel allegedly controlled by the family or relatives of the omnipresent Rajiv Shukla. Akhilesh Yadav and the Samajwadi Party are well aware that Dainik Jagran has long been antagonistic to Dalit-Bahujan interests. The newspaper represents a Bania-Brahmin corporate and ideological enterprise.