Skip to main content

Need to put up demand to send Land Acquisition Bill to Parliamentary Committee

By Venkatesh Nayak*
The Government of India officially announced in the Lok Sabha on April 30, 2015 that it will table the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015 (Land Bill) next week to replace the Ordinance that was promulgated for the second time on 03 April, 2015. This Land Ordinance is already operational and the Bill seeks to replace the Ordinance which amends the Land Acquisition Act (LARR Act) passed by Parliament in 2013 in many crucial areas. There are only three days left for the Lok Sabha to conclude its business next week starting May 5.
No formal public consultation yet on the amendment proposals. Neither the Department of Land Resources which has the responsibility for all matters relating to land acquisition law under the Allocation of Business Rules, 1961 nor any other department of the Government of India has sought people’s views on the proposals to amend LARR Act. This is a violation of Government of india’s own Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy (PLCP) adopted in January 2014 (click HERE to read).

The PLCP makes it mandatory for every department to:

  • “2… publish/place in public domain the draft legislation or at least the information that may inter alia include brief justification for such legislation, essential elements of the proposed legislation, its broad financial implications, and an estimated assessment of the impact of such legislation on environment, fundamental rights, lives and livelihoods of the concerned/affected people, etc. Such details may be kept in the public domain for a minimum period of thirty days for being proactively shared with the public in such manner as may be specified by the Department/Ministry concerned.
  • Where such legislation affect specific group of people, it may be documented and disclosed through print or electronic media or in such other manner, as may be considered necessary to give wider publicity to reach the affected people….
  • The summary of feedback/comments received from the public/other stakeholders should also be placed on the website of the Department/Ministry concerned….
  • The summary of pre-legislative process should also be placed before the Department Related Parliamentary Standing Committee by the Department/Ministry concerned when the proposed legislation is brought to the Parliament and is referred to the Standing Committee.
  • If the Department/Ministry concerned is of the view that it is not feasible or desirable to hold pre-legislative consultation as detailed above, it may record the reasons in the note for the Cabinet.”
So the requirement under PCLP is to place all details of the likely impact of the amendment proposals and seek people’s views. To the best of my knowledge no formal effort has been made in this regard. Further, there is no call for discussing the amendment proposals on the much touted public consultation platform. Instead one interesting topic mooted for discussion on this platform amongst several is: “Share your views for promotion of fabrics for fashion industry”. If readers know of any formal effort to seek people’s comments on the Land Bill, please enlighten me.
Apart from not complying with the requirements of PLCP, the Department of Land Resources has also refused to disclose the Cabinet Note relating to the Land Ordinance despite many of us asking for it under the RTI Act.

What can citizens do to demand formal public consultation on the Land Bill?

While there are many critics of the proposed changes to the land acquisition law, there are several others who support it. Parliament must have the benefit of all views and opinions on the subject before it makes an informed decision on the amendment proposals – whether to approve, further amend or reject.
Parliament has also created a mechanism for seeking people’s views on fresh Bills or proposals to amend existing laws- namely, referral to the Department-related Standing Committee. In this case the appropriate mechanism is the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Rural Development chaired by Shri Hukum Dev Narayan, MP (BJP). This committee has 21 members from the Lok Sabha and 10 members from the Rajya Sabha belonging to all major political parties click HERE to read).
As citizen taxpayers who are likely to be affected directly or indirectly by the proposals to amend the land acquisition law, everybody in India has the right to demand that the Land Bill be referred to the Standing Committee on Rural Development. The Speaker of the Lok Sabha has the power to refer the amendment Bill to this Committee if there is enough demand from the MPs and concurrence from the Government of India.
Here are several things you can do:
1) Tweet the message below from your Twitter account NOW:
“Land Bill must be sent to the Rural Development Parliamentary Committee” (70 characters)
2) Email the message below to the Lok Sabha Speaker’s Office at this address: speakerloksabha@sansad.nic.in and cc to s_mahajan@nic.in NOW
“Madam Speaker,
WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, have not been consulted on the land acquisition amendment Bill. So, we urge you to send this Bill to the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Rural Development for deeper discussion and wider public consultation.
(Your name)”
Please feel free to translate this message into your language before emailing it.
3) Fax this message to the Lok Sabha Speaker’s Office at: 011-23792927,NOW
“Madam Speaker,
WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, have not been consulted on the land acquisition amendment Bill. So, we urge you to send this Bill to the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Rural Development for deeper discussion and wider public consultation.
(Your name and signature)”
Please feel free to translate this message into your language before faxing it.
4) SMS this message to your Lok Sabha MP, NOW:
“Please urge the Lok Sabha Speaker to send the Land Acquisition Bill to the Parliamentary Standing on Rural Development for wider consultation.” (141 characters)
Please feel free to translate this message into your language before SMSing it.
5) Those of you who are registered on the Prime Minister’s website (pmindia.gov.in) please send the following message, NOW:
“WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, urge you to recommend to the Lok Sabha Speaker to send the Land Acquisition Bill to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Rural Development for widespread public consultation.”

*Programme Coordinator, Access to Information Programme, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative, New Delhi

Comments

TRENDING

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी: जल जीवन मिशन के लक्ष्य को पाने समन्वित प्रयास जरूरी

- राज कुमार सिन्हा*  जल संसाधन से जुड़ी स्थायी समिति ने वर्तमान लोकसभा सत्र में पेश रिपोर्ट में बताया है कि "नल से जल" मिशन में राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी साबित हुए हैं। जबकि देश के 11 राज्यों में शत-प्रतिशत ग्रामीणों को नल से जल आपूर्ति शुरू कर दी गई है। रिपोर्ट में समिति ने केंद्र सरकार को सिफारिश की है कि मिशन पुरा करने में राज्य सरकारों की समस्याओं पर गौर किया जाए। 

Censor Board's bullying delays 'Phule': A blow to India's democratic spirit

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  A film based on the life and legacy of Jyotiba Phule and Savitribai Phule was expected to release today. Instead, its release has been pushed to the last week of April. The reason? Protests by self-proclaimed guardians of caste pride—certain Brahmin groups—and forced edits demanded by a thoroughly discredited Censor Board.

Maoist call for peace talks: A democratic opening amidst state repression?

By Harsh Thakor*  The readiness of the CPI (Maoist), a banned organisation, for peace talks is seen as signifying a democratic gesture that should be welcomed by all who uphold democratic values. The ongoing conflict under ‘Operation Kagaar’ in Central India represents a clash between alleged state aggression and self-defence by oppressed communities. Critics argue that the Indian government has violated constitutional principles by promoting corporate expansion in Adivasi regions under the pretext of development, endangering the lives and livelihoods of local populations.

CASR urges immediate halt to Operation Kagaar, calls for peace talks with Maoists

By A Representative   The Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), a collective of over 40 civil society organizations, has issued a press statement demanding an immediate end to "Operation Kagaar" and alleged state-led killings of Maoist rebels and indigenous people in central India. The group also called on the central government to create a conducive environment for initiating peace talks with the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist).

Incarcerated for 2,424 days, Sudhir Dhawale combines Ambedkarism with Marxism

By Harsh Thakor   One of those who faced incarceration both under Congress and BJP rule, Sudhir Dhawale was arrested on June 6, 2018, one of the first six among the 16 people held in what became known as the Elgar Parishad case. After spending 2,424 days in incarceration, he became the ninth to be released from jail—alongside Rona Wilson, who walked free with him on January 24. The Bombay High Court granted them bail, citing the prolonged imprisonment without trial as a key factor. I will always remember the moments we spent together in Mumbai between 1998 and 2006, during public meetings and protests across a wide range of issues. Sudhir was unwavering in his commitment to Maoism, upholding the torch of B.R. Ambedkar, and resisting Brahmanical fascism. He sought to bridge the philosophies of Marxism and Ambedkarism. With boundless energy, he waved the banner of liberation, becoming the backbone of the revolutionary democratic centre in Mumbai and Maharashtra. He dedicated himself ...

Why crucifixion is a comprehensive message of political journey for the liberation of the oppressed

By Vijayan MJ  Passion week is that time of the year when Christians all over the world remind themselves about the sufferings, anguish, pain and the bloody crucifixion that Jesus Christ took on himself, as part of his mission of emancipating the people and establishing the kingdom of god. The crucifixion was not just a great symbolism of the personal sacrifice of one person, but it was a comprehensive messaging of a political journey for the liberation of the oppressed; one filled with struggle, militancy, celebration of life, rejection of temptations, betrayals, grief, the long-walk with the cross, crucifixion and ultimately resurrection as a symbol of victory over the oppressors and evil. 

How Mumbai University crumbles: Not just its buildings

By Rosamma Thomas*  In recent days, the news from the University of Mumbai has been far from inspiring – clumps of plaster have fallen off the ceiling at the CD Deshmukh Bhavan, and it was good fortune that no one was injured; creepy crawlies were found in the water dispenser that students use to collect drinking water, and timely warning videos circulated by vigilant students have kept people safe so far.

CPM’s evaluation of BJP reflects its political character and its reluctance to take on battle against neo-fascism

By Harsh Thakor*  A controversial debate has emerged in the revolutionary camp regarding the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s categorization of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Many Communists criticize the CPM’s reluctance to label the BJP as a fascist party and India as a fascist state. Various factors must be considered to arrive at an accurate assessment. Understanding the original meaning and historical development of fascism is essential, as well as analyzing how it manifests in the present global and national context.

Akhilesh Yadav’s boycott of Dainik Jagran: A step towards accountability or political rhetoric?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat  Akhilesh Yadav has called for a total boycott of Dainik Jagran, a newspaper owned by the Gupta family. He also declared that the Samajwadi Party will no longer participate in any panel discussions organized by a media channel allegedly controlled by the family or relatives of the omnipresent Rajiv Shukla. Akhilesh Yadav and the Samajwadi Party are well aware that Dainik Jagran has long been antagonistic to Dalit-Bahujan interests. The newspaper represents a Bania-Brahmin corporate and ideological enterprise.