Skip to main content

Teesta case: Gujarat police "did not even know" memorial for riot victims got just Rs 4.5 lakh as donation

Gulberg Society
By Satyakam Mehta
Two days ahead of the Supreme Court's bar on the Gujarat police to arrest well-known human rights activist Teesta Setalvad and and her husband Javed Anand ends, eminent advocate Mihir Desai has said that the police charge that Rs 1.5 crore for the memorial for the victims of the 2002 riots were “embezzled” suggests how casually the investigators have looked into details. Desai told this correspondent, “They were not even aware about the extent of donations for the purpose. We informed them with proper documents that Rs 4.5 lakh was collected.”
Talking about the controversy surrounding the proposed memorial, Desai said only Rs 4.5 lakh could be collected for the purpose but the money was not adequate to purchase all the houses and lands in the society to set up a memorial. “The donors were informed, who in return, asked the money to be used for other specific human rights work”, he added.
Desai went on, “The Gulberg Society office-bearers were informed in writing that the collection was not enough and the memorial was not working out. Every single communique relating to this is with the police and in the courts.”
Asked specifically about the memorial, Desai said only Rs 4.5 lakh could be collected for the purpose but the money was not adequate to purchase all the houses and lands in the society to set up a memorial. “The donors were informed, who in return, asked the money to be used for other specific human rights work”, he added.
Summarising what is already with the courts and the Crime Branch police, Desai, who is one Setalvad’s counsels also, and is based in Mumbai, said, “Every single bank account statement, every single credit card statement and as many as 25,000 vouchers are with the police and are attached to more than 1,000 pages of affidavits that we filed in the court.”
Desai insisted, “It is surprising for the police to say and the (Gujarat High) Court to agree that we are not cooperating with the investigation, though the FIR against us and the inquiry thereafter has gone much far ahead than the original memorial case.” He added, despite this “we have submitted every single paper they wanted.”
“Courts in the state have been told that the police got the accounts of the trusts re-audited and could not find anything there”, Desai wondered how could personal expenses from the credit cards of Teesta and others be described as “misuse of donations, while no such usage has ever been debited to the accounts of the two trusts.”
According to him, “Donors like the Ford Foundation and all others don’t give monies just like that. They want an account of every single penny spent. It is surprising that the police have not even approached the donors to verify if they were satisfied with the use of funds. The Home Ministry examines every details.”
“All documents and deeds of the trusts, which have eminent people from various fields on the board, approving reimbursement to Setalvad and Anand to carry out executive functions of the various public welfare activities have been submitted”, he asserted.
The top lawyer's observations come amidst allegations running high against Setalvad, the person who fought some of the most crucial legal battles for the victims of the 2002 Gujarat riots. While the riots may be going into the backburner, pitched legal battles between human rights activists and the Gujarat government continue.
Setalvad, along with Anand and other members of NGOs, Citizens for Peace and Justice and Sabrang Trust, with the help of battery of two dozen lawyers, have fought about 20 cases in various courts to bring in life imprisonment orders for as many as 125 convicts, besides many others who got smaller sentences.
Electorally Gujarat's BJP rulers may have gained, but, thanks to Setalvad, they have lost face among respected sections of society, one reason why, many believe, they are moving so fast to “prove” Setalvad and other guilty of embezzlement. They are facing charges that they abused for purely personal gains funds collected in the name of riot victims of Gulberg Society in Ahmedabad, where they were supposed to raise a memorial in homage to those who were killed.
The charge, filed by the Crime Branch police in Ahmedabad, is that Teesta and the public trusts she represents collected donations for the purpose that was never fulfilled. She, through eminent lawyers, has dismissed the charges as “malicious and politically-motivated”. According to her the charges were virtually to hound her team for taking on the then chief minister and now Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
The “political motivation” charge spawns from her long-drawn court battle for Zakia Jafri, widow of slain politician Ehsan Jafri, who was among 69 people killed in a massacre at Gulberg Society in Ahmedabad on February 28, 2002, that is being fiercely fought with her lawyers arguing for over seven years in various courts to establish the involvement of the highest office in the Gujarat Government in provoking targetted killings of a particular community.
The present case against her, in which she has got reprieve from Supreme Court that has prevented her arrest till February 19, is that she through her organisations, Citizens for Peace and Justice and Sabrang Trust, promised the residents of the devastated Gulberg Society to raise a memorial to those who lost their lives, and that they should not sell off their houses or land.
But the memorial never took shape and the donations collected for it were embezzled. The charge that is being vigorously flagged in the courts is that Teesta and her husband Javed Anand used loads of this money through credit cards for personal use like foreign sojourns, buying branded clothes as well as expensive liquor.

Comments

TRENDING

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी: जल जीवन मिशन के लक्ष्य को पाने समन्वित प्रयास जरूरी

- राज कुमार सिन्हा*  जल संसाधन से जुड़ी स्थायी समिति ने वर्तमान लोकसभा सत्र में पेश रिपोर्ट में बताया है कि "नल से जल" मिशन में राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी साबित हुए हैं। जबकि देश के 11 राज्यों में शत-प्रतिशत ग्रामीणों को नल से जल आपूर्ति शुरू कर दी गई है। रिपोर्ट में समिति ने केंद्र सरकार को सिफारिश की है कि मिशन पुरा करने में राज्य सरकारों की समस्याओं पर गौर किया जाए। 

Censor Board's bullying delays 'Phule': A blow to India's democratic spirit

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  A film based on the life and legacy of Jyotiba Phule and Savitribai Phule was expected to release today. Instead, its release has been pushed to the last week of April. The reason? Protests by self-proclaimed guardians of caste pride—certain Brahmin groups—and forced edits demanded by a thoroughly discredited Censor Board.

PUCL files complaint with SC against Gujarat police, municipal authorities for 'unlawful' demolitions, custodial 'violence'

By A Representative   The People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has lodged a formal complaint with the Chief Justice of India, urging the Supreme Court to initiate suo-moto contempt proceedings against the police and municipal authorities in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The complaint alleges that these officials have engaged in unlawful demolitions and custodial violence, in direct violation of a Supreme Court order issued in November 2024.

Aurangzeb’s last will recorded by his Maulvi: Allah shouldn't make anyone emperor

By Mohan Guruswamy  Aurangzeb’s grave is a simple slab open to the sky lying along the roadside at Khuldabad near Aurangabad. I once stopped by to marvel at the tomb of an Emperor of India whose empire was as large as Ashoka the Great's. It was only post 1857 when Victoria's domain exceeded this. The epitaph reads: "Az tila o nuqreh gar saazand gumbad aghniyaa! Bar mazaar e ghareebaan gumbad e gardun bas ast." (The rich may well construct domes of gold and silver on their graves. For the poor folks like me, the sky is enough to shelter my grave) The modest tomb of Aurangzeb is perhaps the least recognised legacies of the Mughal Emperor who ruled the land for fifty eventful years. He was not a builder having expended his long tenure in war and conquest. Towards the end of his reign and life, he realised the futility of it all. He wrote: "Allah should not make anyone an emperor. The most unfortunate person is he who becomes one." Aurangzeb’s last will was re...

Incarcerated for 2,424 days, Sudhir Dhawale combines Ambedkarism with Marxism

By Harsh Thakor   One of those who faced incarceration both under Congress and BJP rule, Sudhir Dhawale was arrested on June 6, 2018, one of the first six among the 16 people held in what became known as the Elgar Parishad case. After spending 2,424 days in incarceration, he became the ninth to be released from jail—alongside Rona Wilson, who walked free with him on January 24. The Bombay High Court granted them bail, citing the prolonged imprisonment without trial as a key factor. I will always remember the moments we spent together in Mumbai between 1998 and 2006, during public meetings and protests across a wide range of issues. Sudhir was unwavering in his commitment to Maoism, upholding the torch of B.R. Ambedkar, and resisting Brahmanical fascism. He sought to bridge the philosophies of Marxism and Ambedkarism. With boundless energy, he waved the banner of liberation, becoming the backbone of the revolutionary democratic centre in Mumbai and Maharashtra. He dedicated himself ...

Why crucifixion is a comprehensive message of political journey for the liberation of the oppressed

By Vijayan MJ  Passion week is that time of the year when Christians all over the world remind themselves about the sufferings, anguish, pain and the bloody crucifixion that Jesus Christ took on himself, as part of his mission of emancipating the people and establishing the kingdom of god. The crucifixion was not just a great symbolism of the personal sacrifice of one person, but it was a comprehensive messaging of a political journey for the liberation of the oppressed; one filled with struggle, militancy, celebration of life, rejection of temptations, betrayals, grief, the long-walk with the cross, crucifixion and ultimately resurrection as a symbol of victory over the oppressors and evil. 

CPM’s evaluation of BJP reflects its political character and its reluctance to take on battle against neo-fascism

By Harsh Thakor*  A controversial debate has emerged in the revolutionary camp regarding the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s categorization of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Many Communists criticize the CPM’s reluctance to label the BJP as a fascist party and India as a fascist state. Various factors must be considered to arrive at an accurate assessment. Understanding the original meaning and historical development of fascism is essential, as well as analyzing how it manifests in the present global and national context.

Akhilesh Yadav’s boycott of Dainik Jagran: A step towards accountability or political rhetoric?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat  Akhilesh Yadav has called for a total boycott of Dainik Jagran, a newspaper owned by the Gupta family. He also declared that the Samajwadi Party will no longer participate in any panel discussions organized by a media channel allegedly controlled by the family or relatives of the omnipresent Rajiv Shukla. Akhilesh Yadav and the Samajwadi Party are well aware that Dainik Jagran has long been antagonistic to Dalit-Bahujan interests. The newspaper represents a Bania-Brahmin corporate and ideological enterprise.

How Mumbai University crumbles: Not just its buildings

By Rosamma Thomas*  In recent days, the news from the University of Mumbai has been far from inspiring – clumps of plaster have fallen off the ceiling at the CD Deshmukh Bhavan, and it was good fortune that no one was injured; creepy crawlies were found in the water dispenser that students use to collect drinking water, and timely warning videos circulated by vigilant students have kept people safe so far.