Moratorium on India's "most polluted" industrial cluster, Gujarat's Vapi, lifted; "reassessment" ordered
In a major decision, which has raised the eye-brow of senior
environmentalists, the Government of India has decided to lift the moratorium
on industrial investment in Vapi in South Gujarat, which was found to be “most
polluted” in September 2013 by the previous UPA government. Along with Vapi, an
office memorandum of the Union ministry of environment and forests (MoEF) has decided to lift the moratorium on seven
other industrial clusters -- Ghaziabad (UP), Indore (Madhya Pradesh),
Jharsuguda (Odisha), Ludhiana (Punjab), Panipat (Haryana), Patancheru-Bollaram
(Andhra Pradesh) and Singraulli (Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh).
The office memorandum says, “All projects requiring environmental
clearance (EC) in these areas will be considered only by MoEF”, adding, “The CPCB
is directed to get the reassessment of CEPI score in all 43 CPAs, including
these 8 CPAs, within a period of one year and report the outcome to the
Ministry. It further adds, “The CPCB should properly demarcate each of these 43
CPAs by physical verification and clearly state the latitude, longitude, name
of cities and villages and survey numbers (in case of part city and / or
village) of these areas.”
Senior environmentalist Rohit Prajapati of the Paryavaran
Suraksha Samiti (PSS), Vadodara has called the decision “inexplicable and un-defendable”,
saying Union environment and forests minister Prakash Javadekar should take the
blame. Prajapati particularly objects to the way the decision was taken. He
says, “Javadekar’s ministry took the decision on June 10, 2014, but announced
it publicly on July 24 for reasons best known to him”, adding, this is the
direct result of Javadekar’s effort to “fulfill” Prime Minister Narendra Modi's
“commitment to industrialists during poll campaign in return for their support
to BJP during the elections.”
Prajapati, in a statement, says, “There has been consistent
lobbying by the industrialists on the newly-elected Modi government, and
specifically on the Government of Gujarat, to start the lifting of the
moratorium from CPA clusters step by step. Ganpatbhai Vasava, Minister of
Forest and Environment, Gujarat, on July 5, 2014, even prematurely announced
this at a public function organized by the industries of Vapi Gujarat
Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC). Vasava made a similarly announcement for Ankleshwar
and Vatva of Gujarat also.”
Interestingly, speaking before the media in Ahmedabad on
July 13, 2014, Javadekar said in a reply to a question on the issue of moratorium
of Vapi, Ankleshwar and Vatva, that he “met the state government officials and
has got a lot of material from them on the subject”, adding, in two weeks’ time
a decision would be taken by the MoEF on the issue. Javadekar, however, kept studied
silence about what “decision” he was going to take.
Prajapati says, “The industrial areas with a CEPI of 70 and
above are considered ‘critically polluted’ areas while those with a CEPI
between 60-70 are considered ‘severely polluted’ areas. In December 2009 the
CEPI of 88 polluted industrial estates was measured; it was then that the CPCB
and the MoEF were forced to declare 43 of those as ‘critically polluted areas’
and another 32 industrial areas as ‘severely polluted’ areas. Following this
study the MoEF on January 13, 2010 was forced to issue a moratorium on opening
new industries and/or increasing the production capacity of the existing
industries on the 43 critically polluted areas.”
Pointing out that in 2009, “the Ankleswar’s industrial area,
with 88.50 CEPI, topped the list of ‘critically polluted areas’ of India”,
Prajapati says, “In 2011 and 2013, Vapi industrial area, with CEPI of 85.31,
topped this list. Thus, Gujarat topped in 2009 in ‘critically polluted areas’
in India and continued to maintain its position in 2011 and 2013.“ He adds, he
suspects, while Javadekar may have taken its decision to lift the moratorium June
10, 2014, the Gujarat government was busy in preparing the documents for
justification of the decision, hence the delay in announcement.
Comments
Laws were made in a manner that there is no way you can work under law. So honest people are forced to break law and indulge in corrupt practices. This is the gist in the manner Congress wanted to rule the country.
Laws must be such that they are simple to follow and the cost of non compliance must be severe. This is the only way country can progress. Not by forcing people and officials to indulge in corruption by making laws which are not meant to be followed.